On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:31 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > I think the practical effect of the lightweight process will be: new > contributor likely becomes the de facto maintainer of the package, > while bug reports continue to be assigned to the non-responsive main > admin. > > Maybe it's better to just rip the band-aid off and acknowledge that > when a maintainer is not responding, we probably need a new main admin > for the package?
The non-responsive maintainer process requires that the maintainer is *entirely unresponsive*, which is a much higher bar than for this proposed, less-consequential process. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
