Matt McCutchen wrote:
> That's not strictly true: you're welcome to write svn-git. But the
> point is taken, and that's why I invited clarification as to the reasons
> for choosing git.
Bolting a distributed client onto a central server makes sense. A central
client with a distributed server doe
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> I think this may be the main issue here - there is no meaning of "newer"
> in git.
There is a partial order given by ancestry, and 2 revisions you want to
compare WILL in general be ordered. (In fact, whenever it makes sense to
numerically compare SVN revision IDs, the co
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 08:16 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > The only potentially confusing behavior was that git defaulted to
> > pushing all branches. Given that, the push failed due to a concurrent
> > change to a different branch on the destination, and it was necessary t
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Nevertheless, if you really want to try this method, use
> > http://repos.fedorapeople.org,
>
> No thanks. repos.fedorapeople.org is a very sorry excuse for a PPA
> infrastructure, it's basically only storage with a
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 08:10 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I'm not talking about intentional collisions, I'm talking about accidental
> collisions, which ALL hash algorithms are vulnerable to, no matter how
> strong. Hashes are inherently non-injective and mathematically CANNOT be
> otherwise. Now
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Nevertheless, if you really want to try this method, use
> http://repos.fedorapeople.org,
No thanks. repos.fedorapeople.org is a very sorry excuse for a PPA
infrastructure, it's basically only storage with a list of repos, you have
to manage everything by hand, there's n
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:16:23AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > The only potentially confusing behavior was that git defaulted to
> > pushing all branches. Given that, the push failed due to a concurrent
> > change to a different branch on the destination, and it was nece
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:10:06AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > For sequential commit numbering, try "git describe".
>
> Nobody actually uses those numbers though
statements with "nobody" or "everybody" can be easily disproven so you might
want to reword or narrow down your definition of "nobo
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> The only potentially confusing behavior was that git defaulted to
> pushing all branches. Given that, the push failed due to a concurrent
> change to a different branch on the destination, and it was necessary to
> switch to that branch in order to perform the merge (well,
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> "Broken" in the past tense is inaccurate: no SHA-1 collision has been
> published yet. I would like to see DVCSes switch to a stronger hash
> algorithm sooner rather than later, but it's not enough of a concern
> that I would avoid using them. If it makes you feel any bett
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 05:40 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
> > OK, got mercurial updated for devel, apparantly OK. Now try to update
> > f13:
> [snip a bunch of git tribulations]
>
> It's quite telling that the git workflow is so arcane and exotic that even
> the maintainer of
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 06:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Git is just a PITA in its own league, but DVCSes as a whole are a
> [...] unhelpful (inherently hard to use) concept.
I can't reproduce either issue. :D
> broken (*)
> (*) e.g. because of the strong reliance on hashes, which can make the
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:06:07AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Here is where you should have done a fedpkg or git push
> [snip]
> > There is nothing to commit, since all the changes are already committed.
>
> The joys of DVCSes. People are NOT used to commit and push bein
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 06:41 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matt McCutchen wrote:
> > Are you comparing git to Mercurial or to a centralized VCS?
>
> Both. Git is just a PITA in its own league, but DVCSes as a whole are a
> broken (*) and unhelpful (inherently hard to use) concept.
>
> (*) e.g. bec
On 08/03/2010 10:15 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Since there is no new upstream release, you will have to triage bugs,
>> cherry pick patches and push them as updates. What else do you mean by
>> tracking upstream closely?
> If there's no new release, I'd just ship a snapsho
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Since there is no new upstream release, you will have to triage bugs,
> cherry pick patches and push them as updates. What else do you mean by
> tracking upstream closely?
If there's no new release, I'd just ship a snapshot.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
de
On 08/03/2010 10:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> I believe a co-maintainer if he/she wants to collaborate wouldn't
>> constrained by differences in approaches and can participate and help
>> out regardless of that. If you review bug reports, I suspect you will
>> find ways t
Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Are you comparing git to Mercurial or to a centralized VCS?
Both. Git is just a PITA in its own league, but DVCSes as a whole are a
broken (*) and unhelpful (inherently hard to use) concept.
(*) e.g. because of the strong reliance on hashes, which can make the whole
thin
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> I believe a co-maintainer if he/she wants to collaborate wouldn't
> constrained by differences in approaches and can participate and help
> out regardless of that. If you review bug reports, I suspect you will
> find ways to help. It just requires letting go of the notion
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 03:06 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Here is where you should have done a fedpkg or git push
> [snip]
> > There is nothing to commit, since all the changes are already committed.
>
> The joys of DVCSes. People are NOT used to commit and push being diffe
On 08/03/2010 09:20 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> IMO, if you want to be a co-maintainer, you will have to coordinate
>> and work with the model preferred by the primary maintainer. Otherwise
>> disputes will make the process worse and not better.
> This (or rather, the di
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> IMO, if you want to be a co-maintainer, you will have to coordinate
> and work with the model preferred by the primary maintainer. Otherwise
> disputes will make the process worse and not better.
This (or rather, the differences in update conception) is exactly why I
h
Neal Becker wrote:
> OK, got mercurial updated for devel, apparantly OK. Now try to update
> f13:
[snip a bunch of git tribulations]
It's quite telling that the git workflow is so arcane and exotic that even
the maintainer of another DVCS cannot figure it out! Git just has to do
everything in i
On 08/03/2010 09:06 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> PS: And since PulseAudio is a shared technology also used by other desktops
> than just GNOME, I'd be willing to pick up comaintainership, but then it'd
> very likely be maintained in KDE SIG style, aggressively tracking upstream
> development.
IMO
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I was on vacation for two weeks, but I'm back now. So our manpower
> should be even again :-)
LOL, it's true that you do a lot of work all by yourself. ;-)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
I wrote:
> s/desktop/GNOME/
>
> KDE packages are tracking upstream closely and are regularly updated,
> including upstream bugfixes. Plus, we backport or sometimes even develop
> bugfixes of our own.
>
> To me, this shows that a model where upstream versions are tracked by
> updates is much more
2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla :
>> Also I think that with
>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged
>> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3?
>>
>
>
> Well, yes, probably. That might even help with the bundled library
> situation. But that's an is
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 03:23 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> It also shows that KDE SIG actually has more and/or more efficient packaging
> (as opposed to upstream development) manpower than the GNOME folks, unlike
> what has been frequently claimed.
I was on vacation for two weeks, but I'm back
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla
wrote:
>> In an effort to try
to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on
>> bundled PHP
libraries, I've produced some test builds. If someone
>>
familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to
>> make sure the changes don'
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> While Lennart has moved onto bigger and better things, which isn't a
> bad thing, it seems that the maintainership of PA in Fedora hasn't
> moved on to other maintianers or at least if Lennart is interested in
> maintaining it he hasn't aquired someone to assist in co-
On Mon, 02.08.10 23:50, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > So, I guess what I want to say is: I will return full-time to PA not so
> > far away. And I have a queue of patches in my checkout (including volume
> > ramping and plug-in effects and similar). Also note that I'll run
Jesse Keating wrote:
> Here is where you should have done a fedpkg or git push
[snip]
> There is nothing to commit, since all the changes are already committed.
The joys of DVCSes. People are NOT used to commit and push being different
operations. Git is highly confusing to people who aren't git
- "Stephen John Smoogen" wrote:
>
> No you aren't just saying. You are looking to provoke a fight. You
> don't like Pulse Audio, fine. You want to bring it up over and over,
> less fine. You want to then duck and dodge any criticism of your
> actions as "being told to not insult the mother s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 4:00 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> Reminds me of a quote in a book I know.
>
> He is like the farmer who came up out of his cyclone cellar to find
> his home ruined. To his wife, he remarked, "Don't see anything the
> matter here, Ma. Ain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 4:31 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> OK, got mercurial updated for devel, apparantly OK. Now try to update f13:
>
> fedpkg switch-branch f13
> Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
>
> [nbec...@nbecker1 mercurial]$ git
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:05:25 -0700
John Poelstra wrote:
> Tomorrow is the Alpha Deadline
>
> Chances of composing the release candidate for the Fedora 14 Alpha on
> Thursday are not looking good, but a little time remains. Release
> Engineering cannot spin a Fedora 14 Release Candidate until
OK, got mercurial updated for devel, apparantly OK. Now try to update f13:
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
[nbec...@nbecker1 mercurial]$ git merge master
Updating f6a7cf0..33f33a6
Fast-forward
.gitignore |2 ++
mercurial.spec |
- "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
>
> Well, my reading of the situation is different. Neither will I be
> away
> for too long, nor is the amount of bugs actually that bad. If you
> look
> closely a non-trivial number have needinfo set, waiting for the
> posters
> to report back. Substantial amou
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:11:54AM +0200, Volker Fröhlich wrote:
> Maybe somebody can either help me to solve the problem or can take over the
> package.
If gpsbabel is orphaned or if Silfreed is looking for a co-maintainer I'd be
happy to help. I use gpsbabel regualrly.
Yours Tony
--
devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 3:05 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Okay. I was going off an earlier conversation that I'd understood to be
> "we have no more 'freezes,' period, in Fedora."
I'm open to naming this page something differently, since it's not a
complete freeze.
Hello everbody!
I maintain the QGIS package. QGIS depends on gpsbabel, which is owned by
Silfreed, who is also the former owner of QGIS. I guess, he is not interested
in maintaining this package any more as well.
I noticed, gpsbabel wasn't built for F14 or Rawhide. Version 1.3.6 is also
outdat
Tomorrow is the Alpha Deadline
Chances of composing the release candidate for the Fedora 14 Alpha on
Thursday are not looking good, but a little time remains. Release
Engineering cannot spin a Fedora 14 Release Candidate until this Fedora
14 Alpha Blocker is clear.
If you have any additional
On Mon, 02.08.10 16:15, Jean-Francois Saucier (jfsauc...@infoglobe.ca) wrote:
> I am a little off this subject personally but would like to express my
> thought on that.
>
> Knowing that you won't put the time PA need and that you will focus on
> another project for a relatively long period of ti
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:10:13 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 01:58:56PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> > irc.freenode.net.
>
> I'm s
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mon, 02.08.10 23:09, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> - "Carl G." wrote:
>> >> >
On Mon, 02.08.10 16:01, Carl G. (carl.gaudrea...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Sure, i'm willing to _try_ to help if we
> can get Lennart to participate and/or pulseaudio experts to assist
> us.
>
> Pulseaudio is currently marked as "Only for PA experts" here
> :
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
On Mon, 02.08.10 23:09, pbrobin...@gmail.com (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> - "Carl G." wrote:
> >> > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
> >> > you can get "real work"
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:17:01 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
> Repository : :ext:nbec...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs
> Module : rpms/mercurial/devel
> Working dir: ~/fedora/mercurial/devel/
>
>
>
> In directory .:
> Message: cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
> Message: Ac
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 23:17, Neal Becker wrote:
> Repository : :ext:nbec...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs
> Module : rpms/mercurial/devel
> Working dir: ~/fedora/mercurial/devel/
>
>
>
> In directory .:
> Message: cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
> Message: Access deni
Repository : :ext:nbec...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs
Module : rpms/mercurial/devel
Working dir: ~/fedora/mercurial/devel/
In directory .:
Message: cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
Message: Access denied: nbecker is not in ACL for rpms/mercurial/devel
Message: cvs c
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan (fr.p...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> maybe I'm wrong (I guess I am), but is PulseAudio really dead? What lead me
>> to this conclusion? Well look at this:
>> * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSIGNED bugs
In the past, the planning and execution of FUDCon events was handled
completely by a few Red Hat employees. This seemed out of alignment
with the principles of Fedora, so in late January of this year, we
kicked off an effort to fix that issue. We wanted to increase the
effectiveness and transpare
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
>>
>> - "Carl G." wrote:
>> > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
>> > you can get "real work" done. /s
>> >
>> > Let me know if you need some help to
>> > make the stats looks pretty.
>>
Jesse Keating said the following on 07/30/2010 10:00 AM Pacific Time:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/30/2010 06:00 AM, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Jesse Keating said the following on 07/29/2010 09:03 PM Pacific Time:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 12:27:53PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > openlayers
I have taken openlayers.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>> People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora users.
>
>
> Language such as this is not being excellent to each other.
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:01:02 -0400, Carl wrote:
> Perhaps we could organize a bug zapping day for the pulseaudio bugs?
> Sure, i'm willing to _try_ to help if we
> can get Lennart to participate and/or pulseaudio experts to assist
> us.
>
> Pulseaudio is currently marked as "Only for PA experts"
I've just built Asterisk 1.8.0 Beta 2 for Rawhide (F-15). The
packages are completely untested at this point so I make no guarantees
at this point about it's usability. I'll be doing some testing on my
own but I'd appreciate any testing that anyone else can do.
Since we have already passed F-14'
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 01:58:56PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
I'm sorry I cannot be at this meeting, but could fixing this bug be
discussed:
h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 02.08.2010 22:54, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
>
> I'll get it sent right after this. Thanks for noticing... I am
> glad folks are reading them and find them helpfull.
>
Thank you for your response. I think not all people have the time to
following a
meeti
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-07-27)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 19:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-07-27/fesco.2010-07-27-19.30.log.html
..
Meeting summary
---
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 22:40:59 +0200
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 02.08.2010 21:58, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> > meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 02.08.2010 21:58, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
Unfortunately, I could not found the summaries of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 1:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Your rebuild is in updates-testing. Does the F-14 Branched Report
> cover updates-testing? (During the F-13 dev cycle, it did not, and I created
> a separate broken deps report for F-13 Branched + updates-
On 08/02/2010 02:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:17:43 -0600, Nathanael wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
>>> Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
>>>
>>> Broken deps for x86_64
>>> -
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:17:43 -0600, Nathanael wrote:
> On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
> > Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
> >
> > Broken deps for x86_64
> > --
> > barry-0.17-0.1.20100329git.fc14.x86_64 req
On 08/02/2010 09:32 AM, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Mon Aug 2 13:15:11 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> barry-0.17-0.1.20100329git.fc14.x86_64 requires
> libboost_serialization.so.1.41.0()(64bit)
Barry is my
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 18:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan (fr.p...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > maybe I'm wrong (I guess I am), but is PulseAudio really dead? What lead me
> > to this conclusion? Well look at this:
> > * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSI
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:20:40 -0400
> "Carl G."
wrote:
>
>> Well, i'm happy to be a bug
triager so
>> you can get "real work" done. /s
>>
>> Let me know if you
need some help to
>> make the stats looks pretty.
>
> Thanks Carl.
>
>
Perhaps we could organize a bug zapping da
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351
#topic #382 Imp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2010 12:50 PM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
>>
>> - "Carl G." wrote:
>>> Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
>>> you can get "real work" done. /s
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need some help to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2010 11:55 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
> Didn't want this to get lost, thanks for fixing this on IRC, but I don't
> have an f14 branch now.
Got that fixed for ya.
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jke
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
> - "Carl G." wrote:
> > Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
> > you can get "real work" done. /s
> >
> > Let me know if you need some help to
> > make the stats looks pretty.
>
> Thank You Carl, this will help the community a lot and is a p
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:20:40 -0400
"Carl G." wrote:
> Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
> you can get "real work" done. /s
>
> Let me know if you need some help to
> make the stats looks pretty.
Thanks Carl.
Perhaps we could organize a bug zapping day for the pulseaudio bugs?
Try and f
Start End Name
Wed 26-May Tue 03-Aug Packaging and Development (precedes Alpha)
Tue 03-Aug Tue 03-Aug Alpha Change Deadline
Tue 03-Aug Tue 03-Aug Software String Freeze
Thu 05-Aug Thu 05-Aug Compose Alpha Candidate
Fri 06-Aug Fri 06-Aug Alpha Blocker Meeting (f14alpha) #4
We
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Erm, what complaint? That it's dead? I've never heard that one before.
> Mostly, people seem to complain when it gets changed, not when it
> doesn't.
The gods of irony are pleased indeed.
However, this maybe a case where it would be good
On 08/02/2010 11:59 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
>
> Yes, never criticise the mothership or it's employees. I forgot that rule, I
> am so sorry. I will drop it now...
>
> Yes, I needed to toss in this last barb. I have a right to express my
> opinions for now, even if they are unpopular with a
- "Jesse Keating" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/2/10 10:07 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> > Would "Fix your existing broken crap before taking up something
> new." be less antagonistic?
>
> No, it wouldn't, and you know that. Now you're just intention
On 08/02/2010 01:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 8/2/10 7:59 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
>> Does this warrant re-converting the package? Or I can fix up the patches
>> myself.
>
> I suspect parsecvs got confused by the contents of the file having RCS
> keywords. I could try re-converting it using git
On 02/08/10 19:20, Carl G. wrote:
> Let me know if you need some help to
> make the stats looks pretty.
:( I just made popcorn.
All ppl can get {insert emotion here}
and never, ever get close to a pregnant Stag. :D
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
devel mailing lis
On 08/01/2010 12:55 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> W dniu 30.07.2010 17:28, Tom "spot" Callaway pisze:
>> On 07/30/2010 11:10 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
So I just created:
http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
Anyone want to help me te
- "Carl G." wrote:
> Well, i'm happy to be a bug triager so
> you can get "real work" done. /s
>
> Let me know if you need some help to
> make the stats looks pretty.
Thank You Carl, this will help the community a lot and is a perfect example of
why public emails work.
-- Bob
---
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan
(fr.p...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> maybe I'm wrong (I guess I
am), but is PulseAudio really dead? What lead
>> me to this conclusion?
Well look at this:
>> * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSIGNED bugs right now [1]
>>
* there was
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Everybody was bitching about CVS for years,
I'm pretty sure I wasn't. But I'll still pile on with a +1 for the
switch over to git
-jef"getting git to compile on qnx is no fun"spaleta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 16:52 +, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> The fact that the question was asked suggests to me that perhaps one
> should rethink what and how they are doing things. People have had
> this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora users.
Erm, what complaint? That it's dea
On 08/02/2010 07:02 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 07/30/2010 08:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/30/2010 08:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
fedpkg build
fedpkg build
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in
a
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 18:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Also, check upstream git to figure out whether a project is dead. The
> last commit there is from 2 weeks ago. Git can tell you something about
> whether development happens. Bugzilla just tells you whether I have
> devoted my life to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 10:07 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> Would "Fix your existing broken crap before taking up something new." be less
> antagonistic?
No, it wouldn't, and you know that. Now you're just intentionally being
rude. I ask again, please try to
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 17:07 +, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> - "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> > > People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora
> > users.
> >
> >
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on
> bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds. If someone
> familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to
> make sure the changes don't break a
- "Jesse Keating" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> > People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora
> users.
>
>
> Language such as this is not being excellent to each other. It's
> unnecessa
In an effort to try to reduce and eliminate Wordpress's reliance on
bundled PHP libraries, I've produced some test builds. If someone
familiar with administering Wordpress and Wordpress-mu could test to
make sure the changes don't break anything and let me know, what would
be wonderful and a
- "Jesse Keating" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> > People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora
> users.
>
>
> Language such as this is not being excellent to each other. It's
> unnecessa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 9:52 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen wrote:
> People have had this complaint since PA was forced on to the Fedora users.
Language such as this is not being excellent to each other. It's
unnecessarily antagonistic. Please stop.
- --
Jesse Keatin
- "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
>
> No, it's not. I am just pushing systemd through right now, and did
> other
> stuff.
>
> Also, check upstream git to figure out whether a project is dead. The
> last commit there is from 2 weeks ago. Git can tell you something
> about
> whether development
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 7:59 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
> Does this warrant re-converting the package? Or I can fix up the patches
> myself.
I suspect parsecvs got confused by the contents of the file having RCS
keywords. I could try re-converting it using git cvsimpor
On 07/30/2010 08:13 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/30/2010 08:52 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> fedpkg build
>> fedpkg build
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>File "/usr/bin/fedpkg", line 959, in
>> args.command(args)
>>Fil
On Mon, 02.08.10 17:01, Mike Prispan (fr.p...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> maybe I'm wrong (I guess I am), but is PulseAudio really dead? What lead me
> to this conclusion? Well look at this:
> * Fedora has 201 NEW/ASSIGNED bugs right now [1]
> * there was not fixed a single bug last six month
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/02/2010 12:29 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote, at 08/03/2010 01:24 AM +9:00:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>> python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-3.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
>>
>> This
On Monday, August 02, 2010 11:24:09 am Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >
python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-3.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
>
> This has been built in Koji since July 30th (1)
>
> Why is it not making
it into composes?
>
>
> (1)
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildi
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
