On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 23:10, Craig Russell wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 2025, at 14:34, sebb wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 15:41, Craig Russell wrote:
> >>
> >> My theory is that the notion of adding new podling committers has evolved
> >> and that at some point the infra tool and secre
> On Feb 16, 2025, at 14:34, sebb wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 15:41, Craig Russell wrote:
>>
>> My theory is that the notion of adding new podling committers has evolved
>> and that at some point the infra tool and secretary tool diverged. Some time
>> mid 2010s.
>
> There is no indi
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 15:41, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> My theory is that the notion of adding new podling committers has evolved and
> that at some point the infra tool and secretary tool diverged. Some time mid
> 2010s.
There is no indication that the Secretary tooling ever changed in this
res
My theory is that the notion of adding new podling committers has evolved and
that at some point the infra tool and secretary tool diverged. Some time mid
2010s.
I don't know how hard it would be to change workbench to use the same format as
infra tool, but it would save a bit of back-and-fort
I've just noticed a commit to new-account-requests which included the fields:
...;incubator,iggy;incubator;
It appears this was added by the officers/acreq form.
The code implies that the first of the above fields is the list of
groups, and the second the PMC.
Not sure why the Secretary vers
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 05:01, Craig Russell wrote:
>
> Was there some other way to identify podlings, like incubator-kie instead of
> just incubator?
That would be a question for Infra, as they process the requests.
> Craig
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2025, at 15:53, sebb wrote:
> >
> > Accounts are cr
