I've just noticed a commit to new-account-requests which included the fields:

...;incubator,iggy;incubator;....

It appears this was added by the officers/acreq form.
The code implies that the first of the above fields is the list of
groups, and the second the PMC.

Not sure why the Secretary version does not allow for this, but if the
account request is left to the (P)PMCs, the LDAP update should happen
automatically.

Given that there is an easy work-round, and the future of Whimsy is in
doubt, I'm not sure it's worth making the change.

Sebb

On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 09:11, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 at 05:01, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Was there some other way to identify podlings, like incubator-kie instead 
> > of just incubator?
>
> That would be a question for Infra, as they process the requests.
>
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 15, 2025, at 15:53, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Accounts are created by Infra, using the acreq/new-account-reqs.txt file.
> > >
> > > This is populated here:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/whimsy/blob/55e2d4cee10bc71ff283e478fa91de749dc6d777/www/secretary/workbench/views/actions/icla.json.rb#L185
> > >
> > > AFAICT this has not changed in the last 9 years or so.
> > >
> > > I cannot find any evidence that Whimsy ever did anything different.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 at 21:41, Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I recall that in times past, filing an ICLA for a voted committer on a 
> > >> podling would request an account with committer privileges to both 
> > >> incubator and the podling.
> > >>
> > >> That changed and now only incubator privileges are set for the new 
> > >> committer.
> > >>
> > >> Was that change deliberate or a side effect of some tooling change? I do 
> > >> not see that the change is positive since it means more work for 
> > >> secretary and the PPMC members.
> > >>
> > >> WDYT?
> > >>
> > >> Craig
> > >>
> > >> Craig L Russell
> > >> c...@apache.org
> > >>
> >
> > Craig L Russell
> > c...@apache.org
> >

Reply via email to