Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server 3.1.2-unstable released

2012-02-09 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 2/9/12 4:09 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: Apache Traffic Server v3.1.2-unstable Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Traffic Server project are pleased to announce the release of Apache Traffic Server v3.1.2. This is a developer release, and might not be 100% stable.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Traffic Server 3.1.2-unstable released

2012-02-09 Thread Leif Hedstrom
Apache Traffic Server v3.1.2-unstable Released The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache Traffic Server project are pleased to announce the release of Apache Traffic Server v3.1.2. This is a developer release, and might not be 100% stable. However, we encourage Traffic Server u

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Brian Geffon
Again, this is a broken API only on 3.0.x branch, trunk is fine. Brian On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Brian Geffon wrote: > Nick, > Are you on the 3.0.x branch because I just did: > > bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git pull > Already up-to-date. > bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git branc

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Brian Geffon
Nick, Are you on the 3.0.x branch because I just did: bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git pull Already up-to-date. bgeffon-mn:trafficserver bgeffon$ git branch -a * 3.0.x master remotes/origin/2.0.x remotes/origin/3.0.x remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/dev remotes/

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Nick Kew
On 9 Feb 2012, at 16:31, Brian Geffon wrote: > Nick, > > Look at InkAPC.cc in 3.0.x that declaration in ts.h.in doesn't match > the definition, that's the problem. $ grep TSFetchUrl proxy/api/ts/ts.h.in [...] tsapi void TSFetchUrl(const char* request,int request_len, struct sockaddr const*

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Brian Geffon
Nick, Look at InkAPC.cc in 3.0.x that declaration in ts.h.in doesn't match the definition, that's the problem. Brian. On Feb 9, 2012, at 6:25 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> >> On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote: > [snip] >> @@ -57,22 +57,23 @@ >> *) Build:

Re: default number of SSL threads

2012-02-09 Thread Alan M. Carroll
I may have broken that in my last patch. I know I had to make changes there. I recommend tweaking the code to follow the comment, and then implementing dynamic SSLNetProcessor. Wednesday, February 8, 2012, 11:02:46 PM, you wrote: > Hi all, > In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following commen

Re: default number of SSL threads

2012-02-09 Thread Leif Hedstrom
On 2/8/12 11:18 PM, James Peach wrote: On 08/02/2012, at 9:02 PM, James Peach wrote: Hi all, In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment: // Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if // SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not // enabled, leave num

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tserver-branch3.0.x

2012-02-09 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder > tserver-branch3.0.x while building trafficserver. > Full details are available at: > http://ci.apache.org/builders/tserver-branch3.0.x/builds/41 > > Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ > > Buildslave for this Bui

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote: [snip] > @@ -57,22 +57,23 @@ >*) Build: Add possibility to extend tsxs command line for >-Iincludes. > Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1212075 > Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/br

Re: default number of SSL threads

2012-02-09 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > On 08/02/2012, at 9:02 PM, James Peach wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment: > > > > // Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if > > // SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not > > // ena

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote: > > > I'll post my patch here so as not to delay it while I find my way > > into ASF git. > > Looks like the listserver stripped out the attachment. Inlining ... > > > > Index: STATUS > =

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - > > On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:45, Igor Galić wrote: > > > > > Hey folks, > > > > I'd like to call for last votes on our 3.0.x/STATUS: > > Lower-hanging fruit reviewed. Some other proposals looked at but > taking longer > to get my poor little braincell around. > > Came to

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Nick Kew
On 9 Feb 2012, at 11:57, Nick Kew wrote: > I'll post my patch here so as not to delay it while I find my way > into ASF git. Looks like the listserver stripped out the attachment. Inlining ... Index: STATUS === --- STATUS

Re: Stable Release - call for last votes

2012-02-09 Thread Nick Kew
On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:45, Igor Galić wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I'd like to call for last votes on our 3.0.x/STATUS: Lower-hanging fruit reviewed. Some other proposals looked at but taking longer to get my poor little braincell around. Came to commit but got FORBIDDEN. I'm guessing that's dow