I may have broken that in my last patch. I know I had to make changes there. I recommend tweaking the code to follow the comment, and then implementing dynamic SSLNetProcessor.
Wednesday, February 8, 2012, 11:02:46 PM, you wrote: > Hi all, > In getNumSSLThreads(), there is the following comment: > // Set number of ssl threads equal to num of processors if > // SSL is enabled so it will scale properly. If SSL is not > // enabled, leave num of ssl threads one, incase a remap rule > // requires traffic server to act as an ssl client. > However, if SSL is not enabled. getNumSSLThreads() returns 0. In this case, > SSLNetProcessor::start() will fail. > So is the code wrong or is the commend wrong? > J
