let me summarise the ideas so far:
stali
ld wrapper
window system
bug and issue tracker
improve dmc (mail)
widget tool kit
dwm in go
text indexing
ssl cert validation for surf
text editor
improve st (terminal)
port scanner
if we need to focus the application in one area then these are not
very go
On 4 March 2010 11:40, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> let me summarise the ideas so far:
>
> stali
> ld wrapper
> window system
> bug and issue tracker
> improve dmc (mail)
> widget tool kit
> dwm in go
> text indexing
> ssl cert validation for surf
> text editor
> improve st (terminal)
> port scanner
>
>
Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
let me summarise the ideas so far:
stali
ld wrapper
I didnt understood the concept at all. can somebody explain it better?
window system
a friend of me, who is a enlightenment developer is writing a new
graphical system
to replace X windows, it is not suckless, but
>> widget tool kit
>>
>
> Anselm and me were discussing about the widget toolkit, the code name of the
> project
> is "dwk" Dynamic Widget Kit. which is atm just a README with few random
> ideas.
>
> http://hg.youterm.com/dwk
Something like GraphApp? (http://www.enchantia.com/software/graphapp/)
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
> Something like GraphApp? (http://www.enchantia.com/software/graphapp/)
looks nice until you realize it doesn't support fonts (and they even
ideologized it for themselves in the FAQ)
Mate
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote:
> I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
> also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas
> have caugth my attention.
I have already posted a thread about port scann
Mate Nagy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
Something like GraphApp? (http://www.enchantia.com/software/graphapp/)
looks nice until you realize it doesn't support fonts (and they even
ideologized it for themselves in the FAQ)
Mate
why do you
2010/3/4 Mate Nagy :
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
>
>> Something like GraphApp? (http://www.enchantia.com/software/graphapp/)
> looks nice until you realize it doesn't support fonts (and they even
> ideologized it for themselves in the FAQ)
>
It does. It is ev
On 4 March 2010 12:14, Frederic DUBOIS wrote:
>>> widget tool kit
>>>
>>
>> Anselm and me were discussing about the widget toolkit, the code name of the
>> project
>> is "dwk" Dynamic Widget Kit. which is atm just a README with few random
>> ideas.
>>
>> http://hg.youterm.com/dwk
>
> Something li
On 4 March 2010 11:40, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> if we need to focus the application in one area then these are not
> very good i guess..
A lot of them have a theme, though. Gnome's GSoC theme is basically
their desktop environment, which is fairly broad itself. If Suckless
focus on a development en
On 4 March 2010 12:33, anonymous wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
>> also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas
>> have caugth my attention.
>
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:44:04PM +0100, pancake wrote:
> why do you need TTF? font rendering is a really complex stuff, in dwk
yes
> we were only planning to support monospaced fonts, calculate sizes
yes
> with changing size of fonts is really complex and cpu-intensive task and
yes
> i dont thin
On 4 March 2010 12:48, Connor Lane Smith wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 11:40, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> if we need to focus the application in one area then these are not
>> very good i guess..
>
> A lot of them have a theme, though. Gnome's GSoC theme is basically
> their desktop environment, which is
On 4 March 2010 12:51, Mate Nagy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:44:04PM +0100, pancake wrote:
>
>> why do you need TTF? font rendering is a really complex stuff, in dwk
> yes
>> we were only planning to support monospaced fonts, calculate sizes
> yes
>> with changing size of fonts is really c
> What about fork()? Nowadays hardware is so powerful ;) fork() results
> in nicer code ;)
Creating thread is not as complex as passing host structures. For example,
libthread from Plan 9 has channels. With pthread I should use condition
variables and mutexes to implement queue.
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:57:31PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Well one design decision for the API I'm in favor with is not to
> provide any font-related functionality in the first version and leave
> font rendering up to the implementation. If someone writes an app he
> shouldn't bother about
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:51:12PM +0100, Mate Nagy wrote:
> In non-uriel style, yes, font rendering is horribly complicated and an
> entirely fucked up discipline, but I don't think a "real" widget set can
> skip out on it. Bitmap fonts are fine for programming (and I even use it
> for web browsin
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:33:53PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
> > also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas
> > have ca
Sub-pixel antialiasing - the vengeance of the color-blind ;)
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:14:17PM +0200, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> Maybe I miss something, but why not just output results as far as hosts
> are scanned? Output isn't that slow to use threads.
The main idea was abstraction: scanning function just pass scanned host
to next stage instead of calling ou
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:00:05PM +0300, anonymous wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 08:14:17PM +0200, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > Maybe I miss something, but why not just output results as far as hosts
> > are scanned? Output isn't that slow to use threads.
>
> The main idea was abstraction: scannin
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:40:17PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> let me summarise the ideas so far:
>
> stali
> ld wrapper
> window system
> bug and issue tracker
> improve dmc (mail)
> widget tool kit
> dwm in go
> text indexing
> ssl cert validation for surf
> text editor
> improve st (terminal)
Here is an idea the Google folks might like: Port sta.li (and p9p?) to
use Android's libc. AFAIK there is no real linux distro that uses the
Android libc, and this would be a project that might be useful for
everyone.
uriel
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 3 March 2010
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, anonymous wrote:
> I really think sub-pixel antialiasing is a good topic for harmful.cat-v.org.
I don't know enough about this to form a remotely useful opinion, much
less rant about it. But contributions to harmful.cat-v.org are always
welcome...
uriel
I will note that one of the original goals for creating werc was to
help build a sane replacement for the kinds of things trac does,
including bug tracking. I would be happy to mentor any project that
works in that direction.
uriel
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Another
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:38 PM, yy wrote:
> I'm still a student (PhD student, but that's fine for Google), so I
> will probably apply to participate as a student.
>
> Since Go was released I have been playing with it. Is there any
> interest in the Go port of dwm? This would probably include the
>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:30 PM, yy wrote:
> 2010/3/3 Anders Andersson :
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:38 PM, yy wrote:
>>> Since Go was released I have been playing with it. Is there any
>>> interest in the Go port of dwm?
>>
>> What would be the benefits of porting dwm to a new language? From my
>
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Wed 03 Mar 2010 at 11:17:14 PST Kurt H Maier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Niki Yoshiuchi wrote:
>>>
>>> This is supposed to be a discussion on the Google Summer of Code, not a
>>> nerd
>>> fight about whether grep or awk i
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> let me summarise the ideas so far:
>
> stali
> ld wrapper
> window system
> bug and issue tracker
> improve dmc (mail)
> widget tool kit
> dwm in go
> text indexing
> ssl cert validation for surf
> text editor
> improve st (terminal)
> port s
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 4 March 2010 12:33, anonymous wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful
>>> also im looking forward to the simple port
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:01PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
> I will note that one of the original goals for creating werc was to
> help build a sane replacement for the kinds of things trac does,
> including bug tracking. I would be happy to mentor any project that
> works in that direction.
>
> uriel
Gogcc should work. Else you have Linux emulation.
On Mar 5, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Josh Rickmar
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 11:19:01PM +0100, Uriel wrote:
I will note that one of the original goals for creating werc was to
help build a sane replacement for the kinds of things trac does,
inc
32 matches
Mail list logo
