On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:33:53PM +0300, anonymous wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote: > > I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful > > also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas > > have caugth my attention. > > I have already posted a thread about port scanner in this list. Here is > the code: http://bitbucket.org/noname/netscan/ > > It can scan with TCP connect, raw TCP sockets and raw UDP sockets. There > is no delay/timeout calculation, default delay is 1 second (like ping), > obviously too high for most uses so it can be changed. Probably I should > write some README and improve man pages. > > It's biggest problem is pthreads. main() starts scanning thread and > outputs all scanned hosts until there is no hosts left. Then it waits > for second thread and exits. pthreads is bad, but I don't know what is > better.
Maybe I miss something, but why not just output results as far as hosts are scanned? Output isn't that slow to use threads.
