On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Anselm R Garbe <ans...@garbe.us> wrote: > On 4 March 2010 12:33, anonymous <aim0s...@lavabit.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 03:25:38PM -0600, eze.program...@gmail.com wrote: >>> I think this is a good project idea, and it would prove more than useful >>> also im looking forward to the simple port scanner, these project ideas >>> have caugth my attention. >> >> I have already posted a thread about port scanner in this list. Here is >> the code: http://bitbucket.org/noname/netscan/ >> >> It can scan with TCP connect, raw TCP sockets and raw UDP sockets. There >> is no delay/timeout calculation, default delay is 1 second (like ping), >> obviously too high for most uses so it can be changed. Probably I should >> write some README and improve man pages. >> >> It's biggest problem is pthreads. main() starts scanning thread and >> outputs all scanned hosts until there is no hosts left. Then it waits >> for second thread and exits. pthreads is bad, but I don't know what is >> better. > > What about fork()? Nowadays hardware is so powerful ;) fork() results > in nicer code ;)
Or rewrite in Go. In any case, using pthreads is plain *RETARDED*. uriel
