Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-20 Thread Uriel
are some issues like how to best handle configuration. Uriel > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Uriel wrote: >> >> CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web >> server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all requests to a >>

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Uriel
his reminds me, most such scripting languages are dynamically linked and load tons of dynamic modules at run time, more stupid overhead) Uriel > Regards, > Andreas >

Re: [dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-19 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Somebody claiming to be Uriel wrote: >> >> CGD runs as a FastCGI wrapper (to be used with nginx or similar web >> server) or as a standalone HTTP server, handing over all requests to a >> given CGI script. &

[dev] [ANN] CGD - Ultra-minimalist HTTP and FastCGI wrapper for CGI programs.

2012-09-18 Thread Uriel
with github: https://github.com/uriel/cgd Enjoy Uriel

Re: Regarding "make"-systems [Was: Re: [dev] Build system: redo]

2012-08-14 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Andrew Hills wrote: > On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Uriel wrote: >> This whole topic is so silly, just use a language that doesn't need >> any of this nonsense, like Go. > > Are you insinuating that Go is the best choice for all p

Re: Regarding "make"-systems [Was: Re: [dev] Build system: redo]

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
a lawyer or a bureaucrat. This whole topic is so silly, just use a language that doesn't need any of this nonsense, like Go. Uriel

Re: Regarding "make"-systems [Was: Re: [dev] Build system: redo]

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
cause it shows your program is a worthless piece of garbage and I can completely avoid it without even bothering to build it first. Uriel

Re: [dev] Re: Regarding "dogma" words

2012-08-12 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > I will transform this list to a moderated one, if the spamming and > trolling persists at current levels. The whining about the trolling is worse than the trolling itself. The original poster had a good point: the suckless name SUCKS. Sti

Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut

2012-08-03 Thread Uriel
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Nick wrote: > Quoth Connor Lane Smith: >> % head -n -10 Yea, because obviously what we needed is even more unportable GNU extensions. If this is your only justification for head, it is really sad. > Cool, I didn't know that syntax. Useful. Out of curiousity, i

Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add chroot

2012-08-03 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:00 PM, pancake wrote: > That is vulnerable on linux. Proper use is: Anyone using chroot for security is a fool. Uriel > > chdir (path); chroot("."); > > > > On Aug 1, 2012, at 16:50, Strake wrote: > >> diff -r 8cf300476909 ch

Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut

2012-08-03 Thread Uriel
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 10:33:19AM -0400, Calvin Morrison wrote: >> >> I think cut is exactly the kind of job that awk (or sed) can be good >> for. It seems crazy not to use an existing tool that implements all >> the functionality, that can be

Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut

2012-08-01 Thread Uriel
vailable: Ruby? >>> On Aug 1, 2012 8:55 AM, "Martin Kopta" wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/01/2012 02:36 PM, Uriel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Use awk. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Use Perl. >>>> >>>&

Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut

2012-08-01 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ryan Mullen wrote: > > Exclusion of cut would make sbase not viable when existing scripts > need to be supported. Exclusion of bash would make sbase not viable when existing scripts need to be supported. What a lame argument. Uriel

Re: [dev] Build system: redo

2012-08-01 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Prakhar Goel wrote: > I propose adding redo to the list of software that rocks. It'll also > give you a nice incremental build system to use. I like the design, but unless you rewrite it in C or Go it is not worth taking seriously. Uriel > >

Re: [dev] New friends

2012-08-01 Thread Uriel
I really don't care, luser space, or kernel space, as long as ALSA and Puke Audio die. Uriel On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Christoph Lohmann writes: >> Greetings comrades, >> >> in our reckless effort to improve the software world

Re: [dev] [PATCH] sbase: add cut

2012-08-01 Thread Uriel
Use awk. On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Strake wrote: > Will now need libutf. > > diff -r 8cf300476909 Makefile > --- a/Makefile Sat Jun 09 18:53:39 2012 +0100 > +++ b/Makefile Tue Jul 31 23:06:28 2012 -0500 > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > cksum.c\ > cmp.c \ > cp.c

Re: [dev] Re: Cleanup of (hg.)suckless.org

2011-06-21 Thread Uriel
The suckless philosophy: a bunch of clueless nerds spending all day talking about how to configure their favorite retarded text editors, arguing over which linux distro is most lame, and other equally pointless stuff. Fuck yea! How the hell is stuff like surf supposed to be suckless anyway? What a big fucking joke. uriel

Re: [dev] Microsoft considers harmful...

2011-06-20 Thread Uriel
f the worst web technologies around. uriel On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:00 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2011/06/16/webgl-considered-harmful.aspx > > They learned their lesson and I want a button for disabling HTML5 in my > browser. >

Re: [dev] Re: Cleanup of (hg.)suckless.org

2011-06-20 Thread Uriel
or busywork. He is an excellent bureaucrat. uriel

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-13 Thread Uriel
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:26 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Dillo is not really designed to be ported to use other toolkits > > Well, that's one more point for dillo then... To be tied up to a C++ toolkit is not a plus. uriel

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-12 Thread Uriel
o use other toolkits, it took them forever and a very considerable rewrite to switch from GTK to fltk. Netsurf on the other hand already has quite a few different frontends using various toolkits. uriel

Re: [dev] Tabbed unmaintained?

2011-05-12 Thread Uriel
Fucking German fags, learn English, morons. uriel On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:15 PM, wrote: > evening' > > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 09:04:07PM +0200, ilf wrote: >> On 05-06 22:46, u...@netbeisser.de wrote: >> >1 Oettinger is on the way. > >> Oettinger? SRSLY?

Re: [dev] Suckless UML

2011-05-12 Thread Uriel
comparison. Pure, unadulterated PHB bullshit without even the slightest pretense of anything else. IBM are geniuses for pulling off such a stunt, and that anyone is still using such stuff is just as stunning. uriel On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:36 PM, CHABOT Simon wrote: > Hi all, >  Today,

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
hat to do? You already quit GNOME, it is all downhill from there. uriel

Re: [dev] Why dwm or wmii over xmonad, etc., or not?

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote: > Hi Everyone, I suggest you start by not sending HTML email to mailing lists. Thank you uriel P.S.: Can we please get a filter that bounces all HTML-containing emails with a message instructing people to learn to use their email client?

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
e overcompensating > jackass? Why don't you do mankind a favour and go experiment with a chainsaw and your dick. uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:17 AM, wrote: >> People who want transparent terminals are incapable of learning anyway. > > I'm curious, how did you come to this conclusion? There is plenty of empirical evidence to back this up, just look at this lists archives. uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
als as much as anyone else in this filthy planet, but there are *real* practical reasons to use them. There is no justification whatsoever for transparent terminals. uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
on't understand that scroll by their terminal, and use transparent terminals so they can jerk off to their lame ass desktop wallpapers all day long. uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
enough to think transparent terminals are somehow not a completely idiotic idea. Please forgive us for displaying a minimal amount of empathy of the human race. uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
d computers are merely text processors. Do you read books with semi-transparent pages? Or do you dip the book in acid before reading it? No, wait, you clearly *drink* the bucket of acid when you wake up in the morning. uriel

Re: [dev] [st] transparency - Was: [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
/i.imgur.com/3UDbi.png Hey, some people are into coprophagia too, if that is what you like, more power to you. uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
ut how retarded many of my ideas were that I learned and now I know better. uriel > If people were obnoxiously stating that suckless software should have > fancy fluff feature X implemented in vanilla then I could somewhat > understand the vitriol, but I really don't see the point o

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
hould programs randomly kill themselves? uriel

Re: [dev] [dwm] devilspie doesn't work

2011-05-05 Thread Uriel
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Maciej Sobkowski wrote: > I want to add transparency to terminal windows using transset-df. Is > this possible to acomplish within config.h file? Try instead getting a fucking life. uriel

Re: [dev] Sup and dmc

2011-05-04 Thread Uriel
ution: Exterminate all Apple users. uriel

Re: [dev] Re: [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-04 Thread Uriel
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Christian Neukirchen wrote: > Uriel writes: > >> Please, replace gawk with a sane version of awk, like the one included >> with 9base. The awk in 9base is a hacked up version of bwk's one-true-awk that supports UTF-8. > gcc4 needs

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-04 Thread Uriel
own DNS resolver is still there, and for example on ARM by default it still bypasses the libc for everything. uriel

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-04 Thread Uriel
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > Netsurf brings in libxml. A web browser brings an xml parser?!? No shit! uriel

Re: [dev] [ANN] sabotage 2011-04-30, a musl+busybox based distribution

2011-05-04 Thread Uriel
sane version of awk, like the one included with 9base. Also, adding Go should be easy as it completely bypasses libc and links statically by default. For a web browser I would recommend NetSurf, not to be confused with surf (which is a shameful disgrace for the suckless project). uriel > 9

[dev] Re: Version control for Sta.li

2011-03-20 Thread Uriel
h CGI as well) that > provides repository browsing, issue tracking, and a wiki. The emacs of scms? This is well beyond scary. uriel On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bill Burdick wrote: > Trying to get Anselm's attention -- do you know if he is still working on > Stali? > B

Re: [dev] [9base] cheeky TODO patch

2011-01-20 Thread Uriel
And col(1), which sadly is missing from p9p too, but should be trivial to port from Plan 9. uriel 2011/1/20 Stanley Lieber : > diff -r e39eeddcc295 TODO > --- a/TODO      Thu Jan 06 09:50:05 2011 + > +++ b/TODO      Wed Jan 19 23:02:02 2011 -0600 > @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ > -add wc

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Uriel
s proposed in this list is astounding. And Glenda bless Slackware and OpenBSD from standing against the idiotic insanity that is PAM. uriel > -- > # Kurt H Maier > >

Re: [dev] [slock] Linux-PAM support

2010-11-16 Thread Uriel
work everywhere :) Maybe >> it could be useful to some... Pam must die. uriel

Re: [dev] Re: [st] multibyte patch

2010-11-13 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Damian Okrasa wrote: > I removed the wchar_t completely, added some UTF-8  parsing functions. Cool! > No support for combining, bidi, doublecolumn etc. I hope it stays that way, all those things are truly insane and do not belong on any terminal. uriel

Re: [dev] [st] multibyte patch

2010-11-11 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Whatever you want, wchar_t is not the solution. Amen. Added it to the cat-v fortunes file: http://fortunes.cat-v.org/cat-v/ uriel

Re: [dev] anyone played with mkinit?

2010-11-11 Thread Uriel
If your init system requires dependency tracking then you are way beyond FUBAR. uriel

Re: [dev] anyone played with mkinit?

2010-11-07 Thread Uriel
Any issues with rc are no excuse for bashisms, actually there is never any excuse for bashisms, /bin/sh should be more than enough. Also the use of svn is a bad omen. uriel

Re: [dev] surf script.js - incompatible with openjdk6?

2010-10-16 Thread Uriel
>> 'Java' in 'JavaScript' has _nothing_ to do with Java as in bytecode >> language interpreted by the JVM. It's just marketing blah to ride on the >> ever so neat wave of success that is Java. > > With JavaScript being actually a much nicer language. The smell of a pile of stale donkey dung is a much nicer language than Java. But there are always worse things... there are always C++ and D. uriel > -- > [a] >

Re: [dev] Evils of glibc

2010-10-07 Thread Uriel
#x27;m sure they had to work really hard to accomplish such a feat. uriel

Re: [dev] surf ssl handshake

2010-10-05 Thread Uriel
Slightly offtopic, but just occurred to me that "the SSL handshake" should be renamed "the SSL middle finger", specially in consideration of the scam that are CAs. uriel On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Martin Kopta wrote: > I use surf and about a week ago it begun

Re: [dev] mcwm

2010-09-15 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > 15/09/2010 21:51 Uriel : > >> What issues? and why aren't they fixed? >> >> uriel > > Oh, I was expecting something more along > the lines of "SDL is abomination and pile > of putrid garbage anyw

Re: [dev] mcwm

2010-09-15 Thread Uriel
What issues? and why aren't they fixed? uriel On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Jakub Lach wrote: > 15/09/2010 11:51 Alexander Polakov : > >>Looks like he is reinventing OpenBSD's cwm. > > At least it's running SDL based apps* without > problems. Last time

Re: [dev] [patch] st - alphatransparency

2010-09-14 Thread Uriel
Is it April already? Gosh how fast the time flies! uriel On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Leon Winter wrote: > Hi, > > just a proof of concept, no error-handling for non 32bit colordepth, > requires composite manager like xcompmgr. I noticed this feature is not > very popular

Re: [dev] libdraw development

2010-09-04 Thread Uriel
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > One file per function means a binary will only link the objects it needs, which helps keep binary size down when statically linking The linker should be capable of including only the symbols that are actually used in the program. uriel

Re: [dev] libdraw development

2010-09-03 Thread Uriel
n Lunix!! (xlib and Xft, so far...) Oh, wait, you are creating a new library that uses those libraries! So I guess that makes it all OK. Not. In any case, and whatever it is intended for and how it accomplishes it, to use the same as libdraw is plain RETARDED. uriel

Re: [dev] libdraw development

2010-09-03 Thread Uriel
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > Things are better seen in black and white, as Uriel will no doubt agree. Its got nothing to do with black and white: retarded shit is retarded. Unless you are a postmodernist, in which case any turd goes. Using the name 'lib

Re: [dev] [patch] dmenu - support for xft font rendering

2010-09-02 Thread Uriel
Or you could just use the *real* libdraw, which handles bitmap fonts quite nicely (and if you want another font at another size, you can always generate it). But that would be too simple and make too much sense, and re-inventing square wheels is so much more fun! uriel > On 01/09/2010, at 21:

Re: [dev] libdraw development

2010-09-02 Thread Uriel
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >[snip] > the name could have been chosen with more care, but sane names > are usually taken Except that in this case the name is both insane *and* already taken by a sane library. uriel

Re: [dev] libdraw development

2010-08-31 Thread Uriel
nd if more functionality is needed, patches should be submitted to Russ. uriel On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 6:44 PM, pancake wrote: >  Recently I've been writing the X11 backend of swk, the suckless widget kit. > > After some lines of code I noticed that i was redoing stuff already done by >

Re: [dev] Stripping html from email

2010-08-24 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > MIME sucks; there's no nice way to deal with it. Indeed. http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/mime uriel

Re: [dev] [vp] A media website video player/fetcher

2010-08-15 Thread Uriel
Very cool and useful! Thanks! uriel On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: > This is a cleaned up version of some of the scripts I've been using for a > long time to play videos from sites like YouTube. I use a key binding in my > browser to copy the video UR

Re: [dev] off topic - awk versions performance comparison

2010-08-14 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 10:38:32PM +0200, Uriel wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Kris Maglione >> wrote: >>> >>> nawk is one-true-awk from FreeBSD. I find the results strange, namely &g

Re: [dev] off topic - awk versions performance comparison

2010-08-14 Thread Uriel
lan 9's awk instead pre-process the > expression and uses Plan 9's pure-NFA engine. My guess is that, because > they're greedy algorithms, they both traverse the entire string looking for > a possibly longer match, but my understanding of Plan 9's altorithm was > otherwise. I t

Re: [dev] [patch] xmms like pattern matching for dmenu (update to hg tip)

2010-08-09 Thread Uriel
This seems like a rather clumsy, non-standard and silly way to implement globbing. Implementing * and ? wildcards would be a much better idea. uriel On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:20 PM, StephenB wrote: > see: (this patch is against 352) > http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=4sh7ZTuJ > I use thi

Re: [dev] [patch] add Control-G and Control-D to dmenu

2010-08-09 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > Hey, > > On 8 August 2010 09:22, Uriel wrote: >> Both are emacsisms as far as I can tell, and of little use (specialy >> given ^C already aborts). > > ^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash w

Re: [dev] [patch] add Control-G and Control-D to dmenu

2010-08-08 Thread Uriel
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:22:05AM +0200, Uriel wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Connor Lane Smith wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> On 06/08/2010, Daniel Clemente wrote: >>&g

Re: [dev] [patch] add Control-G and Control-D to dmenu

2010-08-08 Thread Uriel
since it seems like an emacsism. Both are emacsisms as far as I can tell, and of little use (specialy given ^C already aborts). For the 'canonical' list of Unix keybindings see: http://unix-kb.cat-v.org uriel > Thanks, > cls > >

Re: [dev] curses samterm

2010-08-03 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Robert Ransom wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:01:24 +0200 > Uriel wrote: > >> Anyone that considers for even one second to use nano should be taken >> out and shot on the spot. > > It's not so bad if you build it with the --disa

Re: [dev] curses samterm

2010-08-03 Thread Uriel
ust doesn't seem worth it. > > So that's my view on why a curses samterm is a good idea. > If noone is interested, I will survive with nano, but if people are > interested or if someone has started, I'm willing to throw some > time at it. Anyone that considers for

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-02 Thread Uriel
glibc are feasible solutions. Most werc setups are an example of real use cases where one wants to run Plan 9 user space tools on linux (due to hosting/hardware-support/performance/web-server issues) while one wants to avoid glibc mainly because it makes static linking really hard, and dynamic linkin

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-02 Thread Uriel
able > portable, not just Linux-tight. This decision wasn't bad at all and > allows to run it on Darwin, many BSDs and some other Unices. The Go runtime, which produces statically linked binaries which do not use the system's libc, shows that one can build something that can be port

Re: [dev] How about sta.li ? - libc tangent

2010-08-02 Thread Uriel
knows what?). But not supporting such retarded setups might be also considered a feature... uriel uriel On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > > On 1 Aug 2010, at 8:43, pancake wrote: > >> I want to say that in latest glibc (see archlinux) many 9base progra

Re: [dev] [dwm] adding WM_WINDOW_ROLE rule

2010-07-28 Thread Uriel
t; possible for it to have become worse. There are certain depts of depravity > in software that are impossible to surpass without resorting to Java. I think somehow X managed to surpass its own hideousness without resorting to Java thanks to things like the use of XML by fontconfig, and the auto*h

Re: [dev] [dwm] adding WM_WINDOW_ROLE rule

2010-07-26 Thread Uriel
if we needed any more reasons...) uriel > I would like to write a patch but for the moment I don't find the good > function that handle WM_WINDOW_ROLE. > > With kind regards. > > -- > Demelier David > >

Re: [dev] plumb 1.0

2010-07-15 Thread Uriel
little relation to the plan9 plumber - and it does > it on linux where these facilities are unavailable anyway. I just want to point out that the Plan 9 plumber works on Linux as part of Plan 9 from User Space: http://plan9.us uriel > > furthermore, plumbnet's functionality is no

Re: [dev] [wmii] Locale problem with "uptime" (loadavg in status bar) and a suggestion

2010-07-14 Thread Uriel
y broken and totally antithetical to how Unix is designed to work. An option would be to use p9p's user space instead of the usual GNU crap. uriel > > Am 14.07.2010 17:44, schrieb Ethan Grammatikidis: >> >> On 14 Jul 2010, at 13:31, Uriel wrote: >> >>> If yo

Re: [dev] plumb 1.0

2010-07-14 Thread Uriel
While this seems like an interesting project, I would strongly urge you to change the name, "Plumb" is already used by a way too similar project and will just cause confusion: http://doc.cat-v.org/plan_9/4th_edition/papers/plumb uriel On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Mate Nagy wrot

Re: [dev] [wmii] Locale problem with "uptime" (loadavg in status bar) and a suggestion

2010-07-14 Thread Uriel
If you set locales to retarded values (anything other than C/UTF-8/en_US), shit will break. Stop this crap, locales are an abomination. uriel On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:08 PM, nico wrote: > Hello there, > > i changed my systems locales to de_DE.UTF-8 and now the command "upti

Re: [dev] merp is a loneliness mitigation device written in python and Tk

2010-07-13 Thread Uriel
pts. But don't expect this to be fixed in the next ten years, so just use acme-sac ;) uriel On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > Sorry, clicked in the wrong place & sent a blank reply. > > On 14 Jul 2010, at 03:03, Uriel wrote: > >> Also if

Re: [dev] merp is a loneliness mitigation device written in python and Tk

2010-07-13 Thread Uriel
Also if somebody doesn't like the Inferno GUI for ircfs, it should be trivial enough to write another one. Running ircfs on a server, and attaching to it from different clients should work fine. uriel On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:08 AM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Ok, I th

Re: [dev] merp is a loneliness mitigation device written in python and Tk

2010-07-13 Thread Uriel
n Python can be 'suckless' is very questionable). But I do praise the choice of Tk for the gui. uriel On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > The old wmii community probably knows that one well enough, but for > all the others I'd like to p

Re: [dev] Presentation slides software

2010-07-07 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Claudio M. Alessi wrote: > On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 02:13:38PM +0200, Uriel wrote: >> I honestly and deeply hope you fail completely. > Please, put this on quotes.cat-v.org. Nah, it is not quotes worthy, but I added it to: http://fortunes.cat-v.org/c

Re: [dev] Presentation slides software

2010-07-04 Thread Uriel
v/LaTeXML/ ) What you are doing is a truly evil thing. A certainly interesting project, from the point of view of trying to understand how and why would any human being take up such an abominable task. I honestly and deeply hope you fail completely. uriel > so that it can be displayed on th

Re: [dev] Presentation slides software

2010-07-03 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:34:52PM +0200, Uriel wrote: >> >> I'm looking for a minimally sane way to generate presentation slides, >> ideally using something similar to markdown and capable of generating >> de

[dev] Presentation slides software

2010-06-29 Thread Uriel
t the generated HTML is rather messy, and fixing htmlroff is too much work. Suggestions welcome. Peace uriel

Re: [dev] ji - ii-like jabber client

2010-06-24 Thread Uriel
cts with XMPP). The only remotely sane way to deal with the abominable monster that is Jabber is to use bitlbee or some other IRC gateway. uriel

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-21 Thread Uriel
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Christoph Lohmann <2...@r-36.net> wrote: > Hi list, > > Anselm R Garbe wrote: >> >> On 21 June 2010 17:27, Uriel  wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous  wrote: >>>> >>>>

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-21 Thread Uriel
oftware, While in principle I like the idea of the 'unlicense', its legal value is very questionable. For software and code sticking with the classic BSD/MIT/ISC licenses is a much better idea. I personally 'dual-license' my code as ISC and then release it to the public domai

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Uriel
ay away from the whole lot. CC0 on the other hand is quite different and is very useful, and everyone should use it if they want to allow as many people as possible to use their work but don't want to spend a lifetime learning all the retarded legal braindamage spread all over the world. uriel

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Uriel
'public domain' and to hell with people living in countries with terminally braindead copyright laws. uriel

Re: [dev] picture

2010-06-20 Thread Uriel
Public domain, or if you really love CC, use CC0, all their other licenses are crap. uriel 2010/6/20 ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma : > I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA? > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote: >> On 06/20/2010 05:26 PM, Mar

Re: [dev] [9base] rc can't find .

2010-06-15 Thread Uriel
d their GCC brothers in their skill at fucking shit up. *sigh* uriel

Re: [dev] Suckless operating system

2010-06-15 Thread Uriel
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Kris Maglione wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 04:05:24PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: >> >> What's wrong with arch hurd? > > The HURD part, obviously. s/H/T/ uriel

Re: [dev] Re: XDG directories

2010-06-11 Thread Uriel
ally hate our lusers, implementing this 'standard' is a punishment that not even they deserve. uriel

Re: [dev] [OT] glibc (was: [9base] rc can't find .)

2010-06-11 Thread Uriel
rt writing all your code in Go ;) uriel P.S.: Other than that, no 'libc' is 'complete' as PoSix is an insane abomination, and the more complete a libc is, the more it sucks. The android libc is quite minimal and seems quite decent, uClibc is *huge* (hundreds of thousands of lines o

Re: [dev] [9base] rc can't find .

2010-06-10 Thread Uriel
iling list: http://groups.google.com/group/werc9 uriel On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Jan Winkelmann wrote: > Hi, > > I was running a werc+lighty+9base setup happily for a couple of days. > Suddenly it started throwing 500-errors and lighty log said that rc died > with signal 6.

Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

2010-06-10 Thread Uriel
s were severely flawed due to Tom's really bizarre idiosyncrasies (like the ridiculous file and dir naming convention, or the GNU-inspired coding style). Still, it was nice to see a serious piece of software built out of shell scripts, even if it was using the retarded GNU coreuitils. uriel

Re: [dev] Re: [ANN] wmii 3.9.1 released

2010-06-10 Thread Uriel
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Kris Maglione wrote: >> It wasn't long ago that WMII just used rc for its scripting needs. > > Because, as it so happens, I'm not a rabid idealogue. It is not about ideology, but about pragmatism and avoiding headaches and wasted time. uriel

Re: [dev] Is Mercurial (hg) suckless?

2010-06-10 Thread Uriel
psychological aspects that drove the svn insanity: http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/svn/diagnosing uriel > Kind regards, > Anselm > >

  1   2   3   4   >