> I just found a version control system that I hadn't heard of and might work > well for Stali: Fossil. It's by the author of SQLite
Sounds like more than reason enough to avoid it like the plague that SQLite is. > It also serves as its own web server (but can be used with CGI as well) that > provides repository browsing, issue tracking, and a wiki. The emacs of scms? This is well beyond scary. uriel On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Bill Burdick <bill.burd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Trying to get Anselm's attention -- do you know if he is still working on > Stali? > Bill Burdick > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Bill Burdick <bill.burd...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 5:31 PM > Subject: Version control for Sta.li > To: ans...@garbe.us > > > I'm a fan of Stali and I just found a version control system that I hadn't > heard of and might work well for Stali: Fossil. It's by the author of > SQLite -- a single 800K executable that provides both client and server. It > also serves as its own web server (but can be used with CGI as well) that > provides repository browsing, issue tracking, and a wiki. > Here's my listing from ldd: > linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00880000) > libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x0041f000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x004e4000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x001aa000) > It seems fairly feature-compatible with Mercurial/Git (nothing like Git's > submodule support at this point, from what I can tell). Here's the > link: http://www.fossil-scm.org > > Bill Burdick >
