On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:56 PM, anonymous <ake7z...@lavabit.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 09:46:12PM +0200, ⚖ Alexander "Surma" Surma wrote: >> I was just about to ask, Creatives Common BY-SA? > > Already discussed on this list, but for software instead of art. > Unlicense[1] for software,
While in principle I like the idea of the 'unlicense', its legal value is very questionable. For software and code sticking with the classic BSD/MIT/ISC licenses is a much better idea. I personally 'dual-license' my code as ISC and then release it to the public domain. uriel > CC0[2] for art if you want to place your > work into "public domain" and allow anyone do to anything with it. > > [1] http://unlicense.org/ > [2] http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ > > >
