Re: Heads up: Top Secret Meeting in NYC

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 00:43, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> I just wanted make people aware so that when I start committing various >> discussion ideas and such to the repo, folks don't think I've gone >> completely crackers.  (Mike, Stefan, correct me if I've misrepresente

Re: Heads up: Top Secret Meeting in NYC

Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > I just wanted make people aware so that when I start committing various > discussion ideas and such to the repo, folks don't think I've gone > completely crackers. (Mike, Stefan, correct me if I've misrepresented > anything here.) Nah, you've done pretty well here. I wil

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 17:53, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright >> wrote: >>> On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >>> C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >> Status: New >> Owner: -

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > In any case... yeah. I'll close it up. We have good tools at apache. Biggest question is whether we want MoinMoin or Confluence. I have an idea which one we want, but... *grin* -- justin

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >> >>> C. Michael Pilato wrote: Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: > Status: New > Owner: > Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium > > New iss

Re: website navigation bar on IE7

Johan Corveleyn wrote: > Yep, looks perfect (in IE 7, 8 and FF 3.5.7). Xlnt. > I noticed that the "Thanks!" link disappeared from the navigation pane > though. But I saw the "Please visit our sponsors" link appear in the > top right, so I guess that's intended. Yup. Thanks for testing the chang

Re: website navigation bar on IE7

Yep, looks perfect (in IE 7, 8 and FF 3.5.7). I noticed that the "Thanks!" link disappeared from the navigation pane though. But I saw the "Please visit our sponsors" link appear in the top right, so I guess that's intended. Johan On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Joha

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > >> C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just ne

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 13:46, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >> C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? http://co

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >>> Status: New >>> Owner: >>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium >>> >>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? >>> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/detail?id=1 >> Uh ... we have yet an

Re: website navigation bar on IE7

Johan Corveleyn wrote: > A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems > slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It looks like > it's indented too much, making it appear to be right aligned. On IE 8 > it shows up correctly though (meaning it seems ok to me, it'

Re: Binary Solaris packages from OpenCSW

Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Hyrum K. Wright > wrote: >> The best way to update content on the website is to submit a patch for the >> appropriate page. You can checkout the website source from >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/site/ > > Coo

Re: Is sqlite fast enough?

Mark Phippard wrote on 02/19/2010 09:32:23 AM: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:43 AM, wrote: > > > Good to hear. I know the TortoiseSVN devs are not using the dev svn > > branch > > currently because of the previous huge performance issues they saw in > > the past. Sounds like it might be time t

Re: Is sqlite fast enough?

On 18/02/2010 21:58, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: Greg Stein wrote on 02/18/2010 03:31:19 PM: Awesome work! We've just been assuming/hoping it would be fast enough, and would resolve any problems "later". It is good to see we're in the right ballpark. On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:21, Phili

Re: [PATCH] wc-metadata.sql - more doc strings

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:30, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin writes: > >> Greg Stein writes: >> >>> revnum is NOT inheritable. >> >> At presnt working_node.parent_relpath says: >> >>   /* parent's local_relpath for aggregating children of a given parent. >>      this will be "" if the par

Re: [PATCH] wc-metadata.sql - more doc strings

Philip Martin writes: > Philip Martin writes: > >> Greg Stein writes: >> >>> revnum is NOT inheritable. >> >> At presnt working_node.parent_relpath says: >> >> /* parent's local_relpath for aggregating children of a given parent. >> this will be "" if the parent is the wcroot. NULL if th

Re: [PATCH] wc-metadata.sql - more doc strings

Philip Martin writes: > Greg Stein writes: > >> revnum is NOT inheritable. > > At presnt working_node.parent_relpath says: > > /* parent's local_relpath for aggregating children of a given parent. > this will be "" if the parent is the wcroot. NULL if this is the > wcroot node. */ >

Re: svn commit: r911804 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:11:57AM -0500, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:13, wrote: > >   /* Alternative MD5 checksum used for communicating with older > > -     repositories. */ > > +     repositories. Not guaranteed to be unique among table rows. > > pfft. riight. Just wai

Re: [PATCH] wc-metadata.sql - more doc strings

Greg Stein writes: > revnum is NOT inheritable. At presnt working_node.parent_relpath says: /* parent's local_relpath for aggregating children of a given parent. this will be "" if the parent is the wcroot. NULL if this is the wcroot node. */ parent_relpath TEXT, Does it make se

Re: [PATCH] wc-metadata.sql - more doc strings

revnum is NOT inheritable. I prefer copied/moved-here rather than "added-with-history". The latter phrase is somewhat opaque to readers on what operation was actually performed by the user. The rest seems fine. Thx! Cheers, -g On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:09, Julian Foad wrote: > Bert, Greg, Hyr

Re: '@BASE' vs. 'BASE tree' -- was: Re: svn_wc__db_base_get_info() vs. svn_wc__db_read_info() ?

Julian Foad wrote: > Hi, all. I've written up this brief definition of the WC-NG DB trees at > . > Could you all have a look and add to it or just mention to me anything that > is worth noting or cor

Re: svn commit: r911804 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:13, wrote: >... > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql Fri Feb 19 13:13:09 > 2010 > @@ -172,7 +172,9 @@ >    and ACTUAL_NODE tables. >  */ >  CREATE TABLE PRISTINE ( > -  /* ### the hash algorithm (MD5 or SHA-1) is encoded in this value */ > +  /*

Re: [PATCH] wc-ng: remove a use of svn_wc_entry_t from libsvn_client

Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Matthew Bentham wrote: >> On 18/02/2010 11:08, Matthew Bentham wrote: >>> On 17/02/2010 18:40, Greg Stein wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:22, Matthew Bentham wrote: > ... > Revised patch attached fixes the unit test (and hopefully the > indentation

Re: Is sqlite fast enough?

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:43 AM, wrote: > Good to hear.  I know the TortoiseSVN devs are not using the dev svn > branch > currently because of the previous huge performance issues they saw in > the past.  Sounds like it might be time to get them to try again.  I > know they monitor this list.  (

[PATCH] wc-metadata.sql - more doc strings

Bert, Greg, Hyrum, etc. - please see below several more suggested doc updates/fixes/questions. Please comment, and please feel free to commit the ones that are good or use them as starting points for better updates. (I'm not so much trying to get patches committed, I'm trying to get folks to under

Re: Binary Solaris packages from OpenCSW

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > The best way to update content on the website is to submit a patch for the > appropriate page.  You can checkout the website source from > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/site/ Cool, here's the patch: http://www.opencsw.org/

RE: Is sqlite fast enough?

> > > What platform were these test executed on? We need to make sure > > > windows platforms are just as zippy. > > > > I tested on Debian stable. I don't currently build on Windows, but > > all the code I used is in my first email so you should be able to > > reproduce it if you want. I do ha

Re: [PATCH] wc-ng: remove a use of svn_wc_entry_t from libsvn_client

Matthew Bentham wrote: > On 18/02/2010 11:08, Matthew Bentham wrote: >> On 17/02/2010 18:40, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:22, Matthew Bentham >>> wrote: ... Revised patch attached fixes the unit test (and hopefully the indentation, if I've understood the st

Re: [RFC] v2 Tree conflict resolver spec.

Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: > > > > I believe it should be a low level job [1] to detect when a (potential) > > tree conflict is happening, and a higher-level job to decide how to > > resolve the (potential) conflict. The low level should pass the details > > to the higher layer, a

Re: [RFC] v2 Tree conflict resolver spec.

Julian Foad wrote: > > I believe it should be a low level job [1] to detect when a (potential) > tree conflict is happening, and a higher-level job to decide how to > resolve the (potential) conflict. The low level should pass the details > to the higher layer, and the higher layer can say somethi

Re: [PATCH] Define PRISTINE.checksum as always being SHA-1

Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: > > Bert and I were just discussing the checksums in PRISTINE. We think its > > primary key should be SHA-1 always. A secondary index can be built on > > the MD5 column if required. > > > > Can we patch the docco like this? > > +1 OK, Committed revisio

Re: [PATCH] Define PRISTINE.checksum as always being SHA-1

Julian Foad wrote: > Bert and I were just discussing the checksums in PRISTINE. We think its > primary key should be SHA-1 always. A secondary index can be built on > the MD5 column if required. > > Can we patch the docco like this? +1 There was agreement on always using SHA1 hashes in the 'pris

Re: [RFC] v2 Tree conflict resolver spec.

On Thu, 2010-02-18, Daniel Näslund wrote: > Hi! > > My initial thought when I started writing on a spec for a TC resolver > was that it would involve a lot of quirks and edge cases handled solely > in subversion/svn/conflict-callbacks.c. That the svn resolver would only > serve as a proof-of-conce

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >>> Status: New >>> Owner: >>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium >>> >>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? >>> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/det

Re: Binary Solaris packages from OpenCSW

On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski wrote: > Hello dev list members, > > I've visited http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html and looked at > the list of Solaris binary packages. I'm a package maintainer at > OpenCSW. We have Subversion packages. I thought that it woul

RE: Is sqlite fast enough?

> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: vrijdag 19 februari 2010 12:03 > To: kmra...@rockwellcollins.com > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is sqlite fast enough? > > kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes: > > > What platform were

Re: [RFC] Comments on wc-metadata.sql PRISTINE and

Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: > > + Every path for which an entry exists in the WORKING_NODE table also > > has > > + an entry in the BASE_NODE table. > > AFAIR, this is not true for locally added nodes. Am I right? Correct. Greg pointed it out and I fixed the comment in r91

Re: Issue 1 in svnhelp: Just need general help!?

C. Michael Pilato wrote: > Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >> Status: New >> Owner: >> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium >> >> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? >> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/detail?id=1 > > Uh ... we have yet another community to monitor? W

Re: [RFC] Comments on wc-metadata.sql PRISTINE and

Julian Foad wrote: > Hey WC-NG folks, please tell me what's right/wrong/unsure in the > additions and changes below. Feel free to commit any parts that are > right: I'm not yet familiar enough to really be comfortable committing > it myself but I will if you want. > > - Julian > > > + Every p

Binary Solaris packages from OpenCSW

Hello dev list members, I've visited http://subversion.apache.org/packages.html and looked at the list of Solaris binary packages. I'm a package maintainer at OpenCSW. We have Subversion packages. I thought that it would be great if OpenCSW was listed in the Solaris section on the binary packag

Re: Is sqlite fast enough?

kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes: > What platform were these test executed on? We need to make sure > windows platforms are just as zippy. I tested on Debian stable. I don't currently build on Windows, but all the code I used is in my first email so you should be able to reproduce it if you w

[PATCH] Define PRISTINE.checksum as always being SHA-1

Bert and I were just discussing the checksums in PRISTINE. We think its primary key should be SHA-1 always. A secondary index can be built on the MD5 column if required. Can we patch the docco like this? [[[ * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql (PRISTINE): Define "checksum" as always being SH

Re: [PATCH] wc-ng: remove a use of svn_wc_entry_t from libsvn_client

On 18/02/2010 11:08, Matthew Bentham wrote: On 17/02/2010 18:40, Greg Stein wrote: On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:22, Matthew Bentham wrote: ... Revised patch attached fixes the unit test (and hopefully the indentation, if I've understood the style correctly), but I have no real instinct as to wh

Re: svn commit: r911348 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql

Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 06:49, wrote: > > + > > +/* The PRISTINE table keeps track of pristine texts. Each pristine text is > > + stored in a file which may be compressed. Each pristine text is > > + referenced by any number of rows in the BASE_NODE and WORKING_NODE > > +