On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 17:53, Neels J Hofmeyr <ne...@elego.de> wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright >> <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >>> On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >>> >>>> C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>>>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >>>>>> Status: New >>>>>> Owner: ---- >>>>>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium >>>>>> >>>>>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? >>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/detail?id=1 >>>>> Uh ... we have yet another community to monitor? When did this 'svnhelp' >>>>> project come about? >>>> Hmm, looks to me like svnhelp should be disintegrated, no offense, Greg. It >>>> is out of date: "Right now, the working copy is at format 12" and I humbly >>>> expect that it won't be updated anytime soon. >>>> >>>> It is a tempting thought to manage our notes in a wiki rather than in >>>> $svnrepos/trunk/notes. But is it worth the trouble? I'm -0.5. >>> Agreed. Folks can put content where they will, but spamming the issues >>> mailing list should only be done by "approved" sources. >> >> I call bullshit. At any point, I can compose a new message and send it >> to iss...@. So what if "I" send one thru automated mechanisms? >> >> -g > > Counter bullshit. It's a service for the masses to automatically send > messages to issues@, who should probably rather contact users@ in person. A > fan is approaching... > > But you said it's going away anyway. No need to plaster each other ;)
All right. Fine, and done. But if anybody ever throws out the phrase "approved sources", then I'm going to get cranky again. Again. -g
