On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: > >> C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >>>> Status: New >>>> Owner: ---- >>>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium >>>> >>>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? >>>> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/detail?id=1 >>> >>> Uh ... we have yet another community to monitor? When did this 'svnhelp' >>> project come about? >> >> Hmm, looks to me like svnhelp should be disintegrated, no offense, Greg. It >> is out of date: "Right now, the working copy is at format 12" and I humbly >> expect that it won't be updated anytime soon. >> >> It is a tempting thought to manage our notes in a wiki rather than in >> $svnrepos/trunk/notes. But is it worth the trouble? I'm -0.5. > > Agreed. Folks can put content where they will, but spamming the issues > mailing list should only be done by "approved" sources.
I call bullshit. At any point, I can compose a new message and send it to iss...@. So what if "I" send one thru automated mechanisms? -g
