Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:42, Hyrum K. Wright > <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:37 PM, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >> >>> C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>>> Google No Reply CodeSite wrote: >>>>> Status: New >>>>> Owner: ---- >>>>> Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium >>>>> >>>>> New issue 1 by adrian.wills: Just need general help!? >>>>> http://code.google.com/p/svnhelp/issues/detail?id=1 >>>> Uh ... we have yet another community to monitor? When did this 'svnhelp' >>>> project come about? >>> Hmm, looks to me like svnhelp should be disintegrated, no offense, Greg. It >>> is out of date: "Right now, the working copy is at format 12" and I humbly >>> expect that it won't be updated anytime soon. >>> >>> It is a tempting thought to manage our notes in a wiki rather than in >>> $svnrepos/trunk/notes. But is it worth the trouble? I'm -0.5. >> Agreed. Folks can put content where they will, but spamming the issues >> mailing list should only be done by "approved" sources. > > I call bullshit. At any point, I can compose a new message and send it > to iss...@. So what if "I" send one thru automated mechanisms? > > -g
Counter bullshit. It's a service for the masses to automatically send messages to issues@, who should probably rather contact users@ in person. A fan is approaching... But you said it's going away anyway. No need to plaster each other ;) ~Neels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
