+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:46 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Sept 2024 at 08:43, Haejoon Lee
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, dev!
>>
>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
>> 3.5.3.
>>
>> The vote is open until Sep 6, 11 PM UTC, and passes if a majority +1 P
+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:57 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 10:26 AM Yufei Gu wrote:
>
>> +1
>> Yufei
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
+1
On Tu
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 17:13 Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Micah,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>>>
+1
Yufei
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:35 PM Gengliang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Micah,
>>>
>>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>>> comm
+1
On Wed, 4 Sept 2024 at 08:43, Haejoon Lee
wrote:
> Hi, dev!
>
> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
> 3.5.3.
>
> The vote is open until Sep 6, 11 PM UTC, and passes if a majority +1 PMC
> votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release th
Hi, dev!
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark version
3.5.3.
The vote is open until Sep 6, 11 PM UTC, and passes if a majority +1 PMC
votes are cast, with a minimum of 3 +1 votes.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Spark 3.5.3
[ ] -1 Do not release this package bec
+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:29 PM rdb...@gmail.com wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
>
>> Hi Micah,
>>
>> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
>> community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
>> several po
+1
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:38 PM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi Micah,
>
> I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
> community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
> several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this
> high-level
+1 for the new release
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 4:09 AM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> Thanks for the support!
>
> @Yuming Wang I looked into the tickets you mentioned.
> I think the first one is not an issue, the second one is bad error message
> and not a blocker.
>
> @Haejoon Lee There is a newly
> rep
OK, my main concern is that some of the finalized details might impact
people's feelings on the matter (release cadence, type unification,
etc...). If we are willing to take a sort it out later approach, I'm +1
(non-binding).
Thanks,
Micah
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 12:02 PM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi
Hi Micah,
I wanted to open this vote to get official alignment on where the Spark
community wants to move the Variant spec and implementation. There are
several potential projects we could move Variant to, so getting this
high-level agreement for the new home is helpful. I see this vote for
decidi
I think maybe we should finalize the details before having a vote, to make
sure everyone understands the implications?
On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Gene Pang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and
> the Parquet community is in support of rec
Hi,
In general, the Iceberg community is in favor of moving it to Parquet, and
the Parquet community is in support of receiving Variant. The details are
not fully figured out, but there is high-level alignment in moving it to
Parquet.
Thanks,
Gene
On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 2:17 PM Mridul Muralidhar
13 matches
Mail list logo
