the conference system,
> right? So this will be up to the individual candidate speakers and not to
> the people now defining topics.
yes and no, the individual speakers have to submit their own proposals, but
the intention was that the program committee not only come up with
suggesti
is stopping us from doing something that simple ?
If we want a 4.2 so much better, but lets do the simple things first.
And please lets not cloud this simple step, by missing buildbots etc.
just my opinion.
rgds
jan i.
;C:/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/ATL/i386" \
> --with-mfc-include-dir="C:/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/mfc42" \
> --with-mfc-lib-dir="C:/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/Mfc/i386" \
> --without-stlport \
> --disable-strip-solver \
> --enable-symbols \
>
n expert, I can only say your suggestion looks pretty much
like how I would have done it.
Remark, Infra (==me) work on moving translations to a new service. This
service will also offer webpage translation (through the same interface) so
we can ask all our translators to translate
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> I screwed up big time.
>
> My carelessness in not correcting the To: address is inexcusable.
not a problem for me, especially because it gives me a chance to write
something I have wanted to in a long time.
>
> Jan,
On Thursday, December 25, 2014, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>
>
> -- replying to --
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org ]
> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 07:51
> To: dev
> Subject: Digital signing release for windows.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> My suggestion is simpl
't forget that all of the languages need to be done
I have a script, do when I want to generate I simply tell it which
languages..but yes it take calendar and cpu tine.
rgds
jan i
> .
>
> - Dennis
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org ]
sites that offer them for both ODF and OOXML.
rgds
jan i.
>
> I'll dig up the specific filenames.
>
> Since these scripts came from the bug database, the're the 'wild west',
> could be generated from anywhere.
>
> I really wish I had a test suite of AOO
On 25 December 2014 at 20:17, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
>
>
> -- in reply below --
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2014 10:13
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
> Subject: Re: Digital signing release for win
On 26 December 2014 at 00:21, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> It seems (as usual) that the discussion has died out, and nobody does
>> anything (my apologies in advance I am wrong, I would very much like to be
>> wrong).
>>
>
> You are wrong (so
On 26 December 2014 at 13:11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 26/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>
>> May I suggest that once you get access (no rush here, we need to prepare
>> the release first), that you create 1-2 PMC credentials so that access is
>> not lost if on
ccept the mail and rejects it, when that
has happened a couple of times the message below will be generated.
>
> Is there anything I can do on my side?
>
Most of the bounces are due to a full mailbox, so controlling that is one
step.
> Is it worth reporting when it happens?
>
n
each topic, we can start putting some names.
Sounds like a good way to me, please remember there might be some papers in
CFP already (as reviewers you have access) and secondly the deadline for
CFP is february 1, so time is slowly getting short.
rgds
jan i.
>
>
> Regards,
osals page? My feeling
> is we should emphasize that, even though this is being held in North
> America, some travel assistance IS available. And, I think it might be
> worth our while to try to engage graduate level students in CSCI or
> Software Engineering to present ideas on i
Hi.
It seems we have a lot of focus on ACNA which is very very good.but let
not forget that before that we have a little european event called FOSDEM.
We as AOO should not forget that event, since it is likely to attract more
AOO users than ACNA.
rgds
jan I.
Ps. Is it about time to
ish ones).
>
> We have Apache feather stickers, OpenOffice.org lanyards and pins (retro
> design ;-) ). And we have a few Apache cup warm keepers.
>
> Sticker postcards have been running out.
>
> Little sweets are welcome.
+1 and no need to limit it to "little" :-)
How about sweat shirts with our logo, the feather and some 15year marker ?
we should have the items produced in europe there are plenty of cheap
places.
rgds
jan i
>
> Kind regards
> Michael
>
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
any progress in the discussion, would be nice to get a decidion so we can
start making the release.
rgds
jan i
On Friday, December 26, 2014, jan i wrote:
>
>
> On 26 December 2014 at 13:11, Andrea Pescetti > wrote:
>
>> On 26/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>>
>>> Ma
On Tuesday, December 30, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> jan i wrote:
>
>> any progress in the discussion, would be nice to get a decidion so we can
>> start making the release.
>>
>
> I believe we made progress on everything that is under our control. Maybe
@apache.org ? (at least as well to
that list).
rgds
jan i.
>
> --
>
> -
> MzK
>
> "There's a bit of magic in everything,
> and some loss to even things out."
> -- Lou Reed
>
On 30 December 2014 at 23:39, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 1:59 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 30 December 2014 at 21:38, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >
> > > I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent
> > yesterday
> > > about Ap
you in 2015.
rgds
jan I.
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
>
On 31 December 2014 at 17:44, Donald Harbison wrote:
> Best free software of 2014: OpenOffice
> <
> http://www.techradar.com/us/news/software/best-free-software-of-2014-openoffice-1277669#null
> >
>
> Wishing everyone volunteering in Apache OpenOffice a Happy New Year!
>
YEAH !!! happy new year t
I may add your personal life, reminding that we are all volunteers. You
have done alot for AOO and I personally hope for a great cooperation in
2015.
rgds
jan i
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> I've been the OpenOffice Project Chair for two years, since l
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> A short blog post with a graphical timeline of the key events for
> OpenOffice in 2014 is now published at
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/apache_openoffice_in_2014_a
>
> Happy new 2015 everybody!
nice p
behind the role. That person, should
always have a finger on the pulse of the community, be prepared to help
solve conflictsof course if the PMC group is active, this is not a
problem.and most importantly that person should having the backing of
the PMC group.
rgds
jan I.
>
> So
On 2 January 2015 at 15:37, Michal Hriň wrote:
> Dňa 01.01.2015 o 23:16 jan i napísal(a):
>
> On 1 January 2015 at 22:57, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>> As I wrote yesterday, it's time to start looking for a new PMC Chair that
>>> can replace me (only for th
es are set solely by the PMC, and the ASF
Bylaws; so please read this as a recommendation.
rgds
jan i
ans for AOO 5.0. Going from 4.x to 5.x
normally means incompatibility and it not something that should be done
lightly, we are proud of keeping compatibility so watch out for new 4.x
versions.
rgds
jan i.
Warm Regards,
> Michael
ng a
little bit more about what your preferences are (just some examples)
- bug solving
- new code
- build systems
- translate tools
We have challenges in nearly all fieldsso if you have time and spirit
we have the challenges !
Dont forget opensource is not like a job, where you write a CV, its about
having fun !
rgds
jan i.
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Contributor
> 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
>
e back to this list if you have any
questions.
Remark building AOO the first time, can be a bit scary, but remember we are
many willing to help you.
have fun !
rgds
jan i.
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:57 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 4 January 2015 at 19:53, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
&
focus on.
Louis has not been so active lately, but I have no doubt that the future of
AOO (and opensource in general) is a major driving force for him.
rgds
jan I.
On 3 January 2015 at 13:37, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 02/01/2015 Michal Hriň wrote:
>
>> So here I chose some people,
oting. I am not sure
though if the tool can handle binding / non-binding votes.
I am also the strong opinion that if number 1 and 2 are close (less than 3
votes apart), then we should vote again just with the top candidates. A
chair need backing from the whole community not just a simple majori
but I'm confident that the above can accommodate all concerns and
> this election is not complex enough for the voting system to really make a
> difference.
+1
rgds
jan i.
>
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
.
rgds
jan i
On Tuesday, January 6, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 01/01/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Let's take several days, until 10 January, to receive nominations (or
>> self-nominations) for the next PMC Chair. Just reply to this e-mail with
>> nominatio
.
Louis on the other hand seems to be accepted by the PMC and are surely also
a person that has experience.
I hereby recommend Louis be the new chair.
I will continue supporting the project as I have the last couple of years.
rgds
jan i
On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote
On Monday, January 12, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 30/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 30, 2014, RA Stehmann wrote:
>>
>>> On 29.12.2014 22:11, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>>
>>>> The important things are:
>>>> - decid
re quiet we do
> read and think. Anyway, it's better to be sure that we are ready to vote.
May I add something based on a private communication from 2 PMC. Those of
you who think "one candidate will make AOO die, so lets choose the other
candidate", please discuss this in here or
e the english one. To get the best print quality svg is normally the
best format.
rgds
jan i
> - MH
>
> Dňa pondelok, 12. január 2015 10:50 ,jan i > napísal:
>
>
> On Monday, January 12, 2015, Andrea Pescetti > wrote:
>
> > On 30/12/2014 jan i wrote:
>
t; and to some the chair is more important. Since
I am not into marketing (where the title chair matters) I have no need to
be chair.
Remark, whoever ends up getting elected (maybe we should really open up for
new nominations), I will continue to work as usual.
rgds
jan i.
>
> >
>
done will cause the same conflicts that made me
resign.
I point at Louis as our new chair.
I decline my nomination for personal reasons and are not voteable.
I thank people who believed in me and wish the PMC good luck.
rgds
jan i
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
lar to our UI descriptions to a Qt environment.
I can only recommend such a step.
As a side remark, translations will become a factor easier, because the
are stored in their own fileset, meaning we only need to compile once for
all languages.
rgds
jan i
>
> http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/licensing.ht
Hi
Since apache commons was mentioned as a possible solution to several
issues, I checked if my memory failed me.
Apache Commons seems to only deliver java code, and can therefore not be
used in corinthia, we need a C library.
rgds
jan I.
Sorry wrong ML.
Happened just because I read Kay´s comment on the chair election, to which
I can only say, had there been more discussion we would be voting between 2
candidates now...but who knows what happens in the future.
rgds
jan i.
On 18 January 2015 at 20:27, jan i wrote:
>
(I have not changed since I resigned).
I hope our community get a working PMC with a lot more activity.
rgds
jan i
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
a "dream"
role for me, To be quite clear I would much more have liked a situation
where some of the PMC members had accepted a nomination.
Enough said.
rgds
jan i
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
filled with preparations for ApacheCON US (Austin
in april). AOO is sadly not very well represented. I had hoped that the US
part of our community would give some interesting presentations, but not
all hopes come through.
Have fun !!
rgds
jan I.
nse to inite Dennis.
You are right in ASF we alwayes try to make consensus, but I am not sure
what can bevdone in this case. If there is a general feeling that this vote
needs somehow to be redone, I am not the one standing in the way.
Furthermore I am NOT elected by the vite, but Andrea sends a
..so let us all start pulling and hopefully in the same direction.
I for one, will start discussions about what we need to change to seriously
attract people, and give our code a facelift...I do have some indications
from elsewhere that are equally exciting and innovative, more about this
later.
jan
?
We also have a label in BZ for "easy bugs" which you might want to look at.
Feel free to ask on this list.
rgds
jan i
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015, Logan Minnix wrote:
> To whomever it may concern,
>
> My name's Logan. I'm part of a team of five people that want t
It never does, because you do not your project jira but gsoc and that is
jira
rgds
jan i
>
> -- Dennis E. Hamilton
> orc...@apache.org
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org +1-206-779-9430
> https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A
> X.509 c
+1 from me.
rgds
jan i.
On 12 February 2015 at 15:31, Logan Minnix wrote:
> I have a team of people that would like to add the enhancement that this
> issue <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=45593> asks for. Is
> that okay with you guys?
>
> Our plan is to
gs to translate, it
there are no active team the UI will not be 100%, so it will not be
released.
Therefore I see the 2 requirements go hand in hand.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Regards
> Keith
>
>
>
> Were these projects (OOo4Kids, OooLight) included, when OOo became an
> Apache project?
> If so, have they since been abandoned?
>
I cannot see them included in the original IP clearance, so my best guess
is that they were forgotten, but others might know more.
rgds
ja
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
Moving to a full git repo (see http://git.apache.org/), would mean giving
up our current SVN repo, but history etc. will be available in Git instead.
The choice is there, and it is just a matter of how people want to work.
thoughts ?
rgds
jan I.
but I wonder what kind of disruption
> cost there is for current work.
>
Well it is not only do-able, at the moment about half of all ASF projects
work that way. The disruption cost is an infra ticket, and about 3-4 hours
downtime.
We have today more git commits than svn commits.
rgds
jan i.
&g
o.
>
> Can you please explain what doesn’t work already? Although I use the AOO
> SVN, I don’t think I miss any commits made via Git. How am I mistaken?
may I please suggest you read the links I gave.
>
> Is this rather a concern for infrastructure server demand and performance?
no
On 13 February 2015 at 18:13, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo.
> >
> > Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers t
://git.apache.org/incubator-corinthia.git)
This is true for any GIT repo, and not only ASF.
rgds
jan I.
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 10:41
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.o
need to know
- is the brand registred and eho has the current right to the brand
- can we as AOO provide resources to keep this alive
I think it is a good downstream project, but I do not currently see a
possibility to add this to the AOO project.
rgds
jan i
>
> But this may not be importa
HI.
Remark those that follow bugzilla-admin, will have noticed that Infra has
identified a problem with BZ sending mail.
I assume it will be solved quickly.
rgds
jan I.
On 16 February 2015 at 20:56, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> Do you mean that you do not receive a direct copy of
ing" area
> with some specific topics that could be given more detail in child pages.
>
> if there are no objections, I'll put this in place this by Friday pm of
> this week.
+1
rgds
jan i
>
> --
> ---
pretty old and might not be useful with the current versions
> of PyUNO.
Would it not be better to put it in svn?
rgds
jan i
>
> Links are here:
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Python
>
> Primarily on PyUNO Modules.
>
> --
> Alexandro Colorado
> Apache OpenOffice Co
the infra repo, where all vm/appl is stored.
rgds
jan i
>
> I want to introduce a small patch on the mwiki categories which have a UL
> with list-style: none;
>
> Regards.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Alexandro Colorado > wrote:
>
> > Is more than code, t
On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 17/02/2015 Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 PM, jan i wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, February 17, 2015, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>>>
>>>> on a sidenote, I wo
late sets can be very important in certain areas
> of application.
>
> We still have the original resource problem to solve, yet it is nice to
> see thoughtful definition taking place.
Do we (AOO) have to solve that, or is it the project (being downstream to
AOO) ?
To me it sounds like a d
t start from a fresh but build on history.
Not much will change, just because I am chair instead of you.except you
do not need to secure the board reports are made :-)
Have a nice evening.
rgds
jan I.
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> -
re or less all
attachments get stripped off.
however I checked on the vm, the certificate is active.
2 good possibilities:
- firefox dns caching does not resolve to our machine
-- solution clear the firefox history and try again.
- Firefox has the old certificate stored and for some reason did not
On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >"The connection to this we
auses this kind of
discussions, and would prefer to see it removedhowever a statement on
top of the page saying something like:
"This page do not reflect the opinion of ASF or the AOO PMC"
would at least stop the negative discussions.
Thoughts?
rgds
jan I.
On 19 February 2015 at 16:32, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:10 AM, jan i wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > We have a page http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html which
> > seems to be like a red carpet to a number of people.
> >
> > There a
v2? And
> how can we best express these benefits to potential users?
>
> Changing the content, does not change the fact about whose opinion it is !
I have already made one proposal as to how a disclaimer placed at top could
look like.
"This page do not reflect the opinion of ASF or
On 19 February 2015 at 18:22, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, jan i wrote:
> > On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps
> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at
On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> jan i wrote:
> > On 19 February 2015 at 14:14, Simon Phipps > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:26 AM, jan i >
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thursday, February 19, 2015, Dennis
p to you to either call a vote or work
with us all to find a solution.
Please suggest a compromise, that satisfies people like jim (in short keep
ASF happy) and is something you can accept. i am easy, if ASF is happy I am
happy.
tgds
jan i
> Thanks
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> Am 02/19
o VOTE
+1 for deleting the page.
but please sleep on it, cancel the vote tomorrow, and make a wording
together with Andrea that the PMC (this includes Jim and yourself) are
happy with.
rgds
jan i
>
> - Dennis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Williams [mailto:william...@
my page saying unsupported.
just my 2ct.
rgds
jan i
>
> Then:
>
> 1) I also get (Firefox) the warning about "This website does not supply
> identity information"; I didn't investigate this one.
>
> 2) We still load components from HTTP. Marcus, the Net panel in
to create MWiki accounts, but not to create
> CWiki accounts. I propose that we give Keith the CWiki admin privileges
> too, so that we are more efficient in handling new account requests. I'll
> assume lazy consensus on this.
>
+1
rgd
of the SQL), develop your theme,
once you have it, make a couple of screenshot and get acceptance in here.
Once it is accepted I am happy to take it, verify it, and install it on the
production system.
Sounds like a plan to you ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> Please comment.
>
> --
> Alexan
l it should work or be removed (which I do not
recommend).
rgds
jan i.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> On Feb 19, 2015, at 2:49 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> > Am 02/19/2015 11:14 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> >> On 19/02/2015 Marcus wrote:
> >>> OK, next try. Still an e
On 20 February 2015 at 13:16, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:48 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 20 February 2015 at 01:46, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> &g
is request and grant the rights.
>
Thanks for this information, that is new to me, but I do not doubt it.
I change my +1 to depend on Keith has experience with Confluence, and Infra
accept the request.
rgds
jan I.
>
> While I don't have the bandwidth to respond to account requests, I
> Andrea.
>
> Well we need to do a better job with this. Despite its lack of
> maintenance, this page is better than not having anything at all!
>
+1
Sadly enough Infra does not have this information, so I cannot pull it out
t; https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOODEV/Infrastructure ) dies,
> so it has no admins any longer.
please ask infra to remove it, we do not want to have dead space hanging.
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> --
> * The frequency of internal audits;
> * The intensity of internal audits;
>
That could also work, because it does not mention the other licenses.
rgds
jan i.
>
> jonathon
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU6pNbAAoJEKG7hs8n
On Monday, February 23, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
> I just updated the PMC FAQ page on the project website.
>
> Please let us know if there are further changes to the persons listed as
> e-mail moderators, wiki admins, or anything else.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> -
Is there a reason why this mail is sent to both dev@ and private@ ?
Mixing private and public mail lists is not really a good thing.
rgds
jan i
On Monday, February 23, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
> I just updated the PMC FAQ page on the project website.
>
> Please let us know if there ar
ar this could be the start of a
problem, especially if this is seen as physical servers.
rgds
jan i.
Thanks,
> --
> Jeffrey Borcean
> Student Systems Engineer
> OSU Open Source Lab
> jeff...@osuosl.org
>
>
>
--
Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
ions of the
> FSF and SFLC can be justified by the same reasons (the audience in that
> case is radically different) so I have nothing against rewriting this part
> avoiding to name specific entities and licenses (other than the ASF and
> Apache License, of course).
+1 let us get this behin
kins
> and production website checkins.
>
> The question is now, what do we want to do with it:
>
> - Deleting as it is not used and not needed
+1
rgds
jan i
> - Changing some commit messages to arrive there instead of
ussion happened (partly wrongly) on private@
Basically some of us (including myself) does not want to have our names
published where it is not really needed or beneficial.
Since we have and owner@ to every list, there are no need to publish the
individual names.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks,
>
> S.
>
> [1]: http://markmail.org/thread/l4yjh7gcgk5k6ist
>
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Dave Barton wrote:
> jan i wrote:
> > On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps >
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Dave Barton > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 23
On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Dave Barton wrote:
> jan i wrote:
> > On Thursday, March 5, 2015, Dave Barton >
> wrote:
> >
> >> jan i wrote:
> >>> On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
ct mailing list page.
It seems harder to change
> [2] Add a new cwiki page under Directory of Volunteers listing mailing
> list moderators (easier to change but that could be a problem)
I favor this, we add the different mailing lists, with owner@ and ask
moderators to add themself, just
projects, and wants to see both projects evolve.
rgds
jan I.
ps. Using Qt in corinthia is not a problem, since it only affects a little
part of the total code base, so no need to discuss that in here.
-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i
Date: 6 March 2015 at 11:33
Subject: dfedit
On 6 March 2015 at 14:36, Dave Barton wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> > On 05/03/15 15:04, Louis Su�rez-Potts wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05-03-2015, at 06:49, Simon Phipps wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jan i wrote:
>
On 6 March 2015 at 18:09, Dennis E. Hamilton
wrote:
> -- replying below to --
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 6, 2015 06:03
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: PMC FAQ update
>
> On 6 March 2015 at 14:36, Dave Barton wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
> > OK
es time.
I for one will do, as I did in the beginning of this thread (and got quite
flamed for it) disclose my own opinion and as much as I can from private@
without breaking the rules.
I believe it is high time to discuss this issue openly...and hopefully not
only contributors but also comitters will raise their voice.
rgds
jan I.
S.
>
Just realized, that many might jump over the old subject.
This issue is an important issue and should not be hidden behind another
subject.
rgds
jan i.
On 7 March 2015 at 10:03, jan i wrote:
>
>
> On 7 March 2015 at 01:55, Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 a
not homogenous and we deal with many levels of participation and direction,
> much simply on account of the magnitude of the software, the sites, the
> intended users, and the history. We could be not so driven although I
> expect that would not resonate on dev@, user@, or the forums.
I did not tal
s said before, we talk about the code not the website. Due to
CMS we cannot currently move the web site so that will remain untouched in
SVN.
currently (as far as I can see) the web site is not part of the RO GIT
mirror.
rgds
jan i
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2015, at 6:59 P
301 - 400 of 498 matches
Mail list logo
