On 19 February 2015 at 17:54, Rob Weir <r...@robweir.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> > wrote: > > > >> Why not just take it down, and re-publish it when there is a more > >> agreeable content on it. > > > > > > That sounds smart to me, +1. > > > > I note that on legal-discuss Jim [called the page][1] > "misrepresentation" - > > maybe he has comments on what the project should do here? > Let me put it like this without disclosing content of mails from private lists, Jim is also AOO PMC member and has given good advice.
My recommendation follow that advice. > > > > Hi Simon, > > Rather than put it off to someone else, maybe you as an esteemed > project contributor can help with some suitable replacement content. > Why do you think the ASF mandates the ALv2 and forbids GPL? Surely > it is not merely some bit of arcane religious dogma that we practice > out of blind devotion, without knowing any reason why. So in your > personal opinion, as a project member, why do we prefer ALv2? And > how can we best express these benefits to potential users? > > Changing the content, does not change the fact about whose opinion it is ! I have already made one proposal as to how a disclaimer placed at top could look like. "This page do not reflect the opinion of ASF or the AOO PMC" rgds jan I. > > Thanks! > > -Rob > > > S. > > > > [1]: > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201502.mbox/%3CB5FAC1D8-332E-48FD-A495-5E5C9255A859%40jaguNET.com%3E > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
