Re: Improved OOXML support?

On 23/10/14 07:02, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > >> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:13 PM >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Improved OOXML support? >> >> With regard to the quotation from me, yes, it is possible to >> find

Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)

On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote: > Hello, > >> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de] > >> Being a customer, I do see things differently. >> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF. > > theoretically correct, but practically? > >> One day in future LO will save ODF as a secon

Re: the question about installing OO‘ sdk

On 24/10/14 07:22, soyol aron wrote: > Hi all, > I have some question about installing OO‘ sdk. I know that this topic is > might not be appropriate for discussing at here. But I can't subscribe to > the a...@openoffice.apache.org, It always return me the message like below > at the step I confirm

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

On 24/10/14 10:00, RA Stehmann wrote: > On 23.10.2014 18:16, Rob Weir wrote: >> A short term goal, in addition to whatever 5.0 discussions we want to have. >> >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release containing: >> >> 1) Whatever new languages/language updates we have, including of >> course dictionary upd

Re: Good news! We now have a Mac OSX buildbot!

On 26/10/14 09:34, Marcus wrote: > Am 10/24/2014 10:19 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4902 > > Hurray, long-term goal fulfilled. :-) Andrew Rist is as far as I know working on it ... the news is 2 weeks old or so but promising that we will have a build bot

Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2

On 24/10/14 20:15, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/10/2014 Rob Weir wrote: >> Let's try for a 4.1.2 release > > I see another priority. But it is fully compatible with making a release > and actually the two can work together really well. > > I would like to streamline our processes and remove bot

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or >> interest in working on the translation. Why should we add languages >> where nobody is working on? I don't get it. > > T

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 28/10/14 18:07, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 10/28/2014 01:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> Well I think we added all languages on Pootle where we see activities or >>>> inter

Re: Latest survey data on OpenOffice user

On 29/10/14 13:40, Rob Weir wrote: > New post on my personal blog which may be of interest to the AOO community: > > http://www.robweir.com/blog/2014/10/the-power-of-brand-and-the-power-of-product-redux.html > > This gives updated survey results (the 5th time I've done this survey) > looking at O

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 28/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 27/10/14 21:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Concrete example: http://markmail.org/message/usn5khq3imrdibzq Sinhala >>> (si) was requested two weeks ago and >>> http://svn.apach

Re: [Pootle] Lost in translation

On 05/11/14 12:08, FR web forum wrote: > Hello dev team, > On Pootle, in sd/source/ui/accessibility.po > We find some strange strings like: > accessibility.src#SID_SD_A11Y_P_NOTES_D.string.text / PresentationNotesShape > accessibility.src#SID_SD_A11Y_P_UNKNOWN_N.string.text / > UnknownAccessiblePr

Re: Importing translations into Pootle (Re: Proposal: AOO 4.1.2)

On 07/11/14 23:27, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 31/10/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 30/10/14 23:28, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125810 >> too late, now where I was aware of this request I did it already > > Good, tha

Re: AOO mailing list subscription totals, and other tidbits

On 12/11/14 14:55, jan i wrote: > On 12 November 2014 00:30, Dave Barton wrote: > >> Rob Weir wrote: >>> Here's the current total subscribers for the AOO mailing lists I >> moderate: >>> >>> announce 11,318 >>> users 584 >>> dev 499 >>> qa 277 >>> l10n 233 >>> marketing 173 >>> api 149 >>> >>> (I

Re: AOO mailing list subscription totals, and other tidbits

On 12/11/14 20:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > jan i wrote: >> On 12 November 2014 15:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> It's sometimes very interesting and there are some more numbers > > Mailing list numbers are very good. The announce list, if I recall > correctly, us

Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary

On 13/11/14 17:23, Malte Timmermann wrote: > Hi Louis, > > On 28.10.2014 21:12, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> Hi Malte, >> >>> And you are right wrt many early developers working for Open-Xchange >>> now :) >> >> Yes, and perhaps one day we’ll even see something (I joke; there is >> already so

Re: Problem with pootle

On 18/11/14 11:36, jan i wrote: > On 17 November 2014 23:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> Vladislav Stevanovic wrote: >> >>> I can not open some a page with untranslated words on Pootle (for >>> Serbian). >>> Is there some problem? >>> >> >> Assuming you mean this page >> https://translate.apach

Re: Problem with pootle

On 18/11/14 15:02, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 18/11/14 11:36, jan i wrote: >> On 17 November 2014 23:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> Vladislav Stevanovic wrote: >>> >>>> I can not open some a page with untranslated words on Pootle (

Re: Problem with pootle

On 19/11/14 18:16, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 18/11/2014 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I simply forgot it and have this step not on my list. Maybe we can add >> it on https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Localization_for_developers to be >> aware of this step in the future. > &

Re: I would like to give the Mac Buildbot a try

On 21/11/14 11:16, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi at all > > I would like to give the Mac Buildbot a try. Therefor I ask here for what do you mean? We are waiting on some feedback from Andrew Rist who planned to work on the setup of our build env. I offered my help and be in standby mode ... Once t

Re: Another Basic Function that doesn't Work!!

On 01/12/14 22:33, Darren Myers wrote: > Thank you that worked! > > Very frustrated why Can't that be set as a default... its such a common task > to find and replace.?? as far as I know regular expression search is not on by default. And if I search January 2014 and try to replace it with Dece

Re: opengrok.

On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote: > Hi all. > > I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of > opengrok. > > Is there anybody who can help with the configuration ? sure, I have it running on a private internal server. What exactly do you need to know. As far as I remember i

Re: opengrok.

On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote: >>> Hi all. >>> >>> I am currently planning (with infra) to install an apache version of >>> opengrok. >>&

Re: opengrok.

On 08/12/14 12:42, jan i wrote: > On 8 December 2014 at 11:24, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 06/12/14 00:49, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/05/2014 04:26 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> On 04/12/14 20:10, jan i wrote: >>>>> H

Re: Signing AOO 4.1.1 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter)

On 09/12/14 03:29, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I don't know if this is helpful or not. I'm not in a position to check. > > Thinking out loud: > > There are two cases of signatures. > > 1. Digital signing of installable components, such as DLLs and such. This > is also important but a second-

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 08/12/14 20:15, jan i wrote: > On 8 December 2014 at 19:50, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:37:41 +0100 >> Marcus wrote: >> >>> Am 12/08/2014 06:31 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell: On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 09:19:17 -0800 Kay Schenk wrote: > And, I didn't review the

Re: Signing AOO 4.1.1 (was RE: Budapest and thereafter)

On 09/12/14 09:17, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> We had a signing mechanism in place for a long time and the reason why >> we have currently no digital signing is the lack of a certificate where >> we as project (PMC) or as representative the releas

Re: Java 32

On 10/12/14 08:22, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 23:01:01 + > Rory O'Farrell wrote: > >> >> >> On 9 December 2014 22:19:41 GMT+00:00, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 12/09/2014 11:10 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Marcus wrote: > Am 12/09/2014 06:23 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 14/12/14 10:10, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 14/12/2014 jan i wrote: >> On Saturday, December 13, 2014, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Very honestly, I would like that we don't depend on individuals for >>> project resources, but maybe it is easier for a developer to share an >>> existing virtual mac

Re: Budapest and thereafter.

On 16/12/14 16:02, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> I have built the release on private machines. Means a local windows build >> machine, local Linux CentOS build VMs and of course my Mac prepared with >> the proper baseline. > > And you are volun

Re: Nominations for a new PMC Chair

then > reporting becomes a team work and can be much better than what we have > done so far. > > The 6 nominees so far are, in alphabetical order: > - janiJan Iversen > - jsc Jürgen Schmidt > - kschenk Kay Schenk > - louis Louis Suarez-Potts > - marcus M

Re: [DISCUSS] Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 20/01/15 00:29, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 19 Jan 2015, at 13:32, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> I am probably seeming very disagreeable here. > Nope. You'll have to try harder :-) > > More seriously, you point to a flaw that was not evident on an abstract level > but was in practice. I had

Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 15/01/15 01:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 31 December 2014 I wrote to this list that I would be available to > resign from the Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair position as soon as a > successor could be elected. We had nominations and long discussions and > in the end we have one candidate availabl

Re: [DISCUSS] Inappropriate "Compliance Costs"

On 29/01/15 19:19, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I didn't even know about this page, > , until I saw an update on > the Apache ooo-site SVN yesterday. I glanced at it and didn't think much > about it. > > Today, Simon Phipps has pointed out how

Re: [VOTE] New Apache OpenOffice PMC Chair

On 30/01/15 19:52, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Who of the two candidates do you prefer to replace Andrea Pescetti as > the OpenOffice project PMC Chair? > [ ] Dennis E. Hamilton (orcmid) [X] Jan Iversen (jani) (binding) Juergen -

Re: Looking for C++ APIs or Source code

On 05/02/15 04:19, BS, Nayana wrote: > HI, > > I am very new to AOO. > I want to develop a project to generate Excel report file. > I am planning to use NI-Labwindows platform to develop my project. if it > doesn't support then i will prefer to do with Visual Studio (VC++). > Can you please send

Re: [PROPOSAL] move repo to Git.

On 16/02/15 19:01, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > I'm just curious about these statements. Have potential new developers > remarked on this to you? > Since most IDEs support a variety of version control mechanisms, I'm > wondering how the suggestion to switch to git might have emerged. But, > again, I

Re: [VOTE][DISCUSS] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On 19/02/15 22:38, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> Thread for discussion > > Come on, what's this? Do you guys read this list? We had this > conversation earlier this month, not ages ago. It ended like this: > > http://markmail.org/message/2ae5vrtevxyizaje > > [Andrea] The page provi

Re: [Vote] What should we do with the "Why Compliance?" page on the website

On 19/02/15 20:57, Rob Weir wrote: > The page in question is here: > > http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html > > Voting choices are: [ ] Leave the page as it is. [X] Make changes in that text parts where the facts are wrong or the tone does not fit or ASF rules were broken. [ ]

Re: PMC FAQ update

On 05/03/15 15:04, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 05-03-2015, at 06:49, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:03 AM, jan i wrote: >> >>> On 5 March 2015 at 11:42, Simon Phipps wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Dave Barton wrote: > >> >>> On Mon, Feb

Re: [DISCUSS] Java 8 and AOO

On 18/03/15 04:19, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 17 Mar 2015, at 20:41, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >> The problems I've seen reported are apparently all on MacOS. Something >> about needing a legacy Java 6 to work and there is no way for the user to >> accomplish that, apparently. >> >>

Re: CVE-2015-1774: OpenOffice HWP Filter Remote Execution and DoS Vulnerability

On 29/04/15 21:53, Marcus wrote: > Am 04/29/2015 05:39 PM, schrieb jan i: >> On 29 April 2015 at 15:07, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti >>> wrote: >>> Simon Phipps wrote: > Given this problem is not fixed in the current download, should the

Re: [RAT REPORT] - 30 files with an unknown or no License Header

On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote: > On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html >> >> shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers adding. >> >> A quick look shows to me that we should probably inse

interesting white paper from MS shared on the dev-de list

Hi, Joerg Schmidt shared an interesting whitepaper from Microsoft "White Paper: OpenOffice / LibreOffice Evaluation Criteria" on the dev-de list. I found it interesting and thought it can be of interest for others here as well. Juergen http://www.whymicrosoft.com/see-why/openoffice-evaluation-

Re: [RAT REPORT] - 30 files with an unknown or no License Header

On 11/06/15 18:23, jan i wrote: > On 8 June 2015 at 16:58, Regina Henschel wrote: > >> Hi Jürgen, >> >> is it OK to commit the patch? >> > if it not ok to commit the patch, then I wonder how the files was committed > in the first place. > > If it is not ok, then the files should be deleted. We c

Re: Introduce from Wang Li Feng

On 11/23/12 8:33 AM, Li Feng Wang wrote: > Hi, >Welcome new volunteers to join us. I'm Wang Li Feng, Living in Beijing. > I have 3 years experiences in testing. > mainly focus on FVT and automation test with Java。 >I am also a new comer in AOO community for about 1 year. when I joined > OO

[BLOG][DRAFT]: blog draft to reach out even more translators for the languages with more than 93% UI coverage

Hi, I drafted [1] a blog post to attract again some further volunteers helping us with translations. As mentioned earlier we have several languages where we have a UI coverage of more than 93%. I hope we can find volunteers for this languages. Ok for some of the languages the work is already done

Re: [RELEASE] AOO.next = AOO 4.0

On 11/23/12 5:26 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Keith N. McKenna >> wrote: >>> Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/21/12 5:33 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>>>> >>>&g

Re: [BLOG][DRAFT]: blog draft to reach out even more translators for the languages with more than 93% UI coverage

On 11/23/12 5:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I drafted [1] a blog post to attract again some further volunteers >> helping us with translations. As mentioned earlier we have several >> languages

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

the Mayans were warning us about !!! >>>>> >>>>> (OK, maybe not that bad, but it would be quite a mess) >>>>> >>>>> But if we can consider these new languages to be merely the >>>>> continuation of the 3.4.1 release, and an keep the extern

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

z or > whatever. > > -Rob > > >> Jan. >> >> On 23 November 2012 15:01, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we all know that the number of volunte

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

On 11/23/12 5:45 PM, Robert Barbey wrote: > Hi everyone, > > for a Writer extension, we're traversing a document using the Java text > iteration API. The text is extracted and sent to a server backend for > linguistic analysis. This server returns a report containing corrections for > the curre

Re: IAccessible2 integration for AOO 4.0

On 11/26/12 6:59 AM, Steve Yin wrote: > Hi, > > I propose to integrate IAccessible2 as an accessibility feature for AOO > 4.0. A wiki for the effort estimation can be found here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+IAccessible2 > Here is my question. Should I create a fe

Re: Apache OpenOffice / Linuxday 2012 in Dornbirn

Hi Detlef, thanks for sharing this informative report and thanks for representing AOO on the Linuxday. The report is good and the outcome is that users welcome that OpenOfifce is still alive and found a new home under the ASF. But it also shows that many, many user are confused and don't really u

Re: [BLOG][DRAFT]: blog draft to reach out even more translators for the languages with more than 93% UI coverage

gt; > > On 23 November 2012 23:19, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:12 PM, jan iversen wrote: >>> On 23 November 2012 23:05, Juergen Schmidt >> wrote: >>> >>>> Am Freitag, 23. November 2012 um 18:17 schrieb Rob Weir: >&

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

On 11/26/12 10:54 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 23/11/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> 1. Only new languages, no bugfixes, no other code changes >> We add the new languages on top of the existing AOO34 branch, build the >> office with the new languages and release

Re: IAccessible2 integration for AOO 4.0

gt;>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton >>> wrote: >>>> Is this to be based on the Symphony code? >>>> >>> >>> Dennis, we have Symphony code within IBM. Remember, we wrote it. >>> Whatever code we check in is

Re: [early codereview / check for standards] genLang in l10ntools

On 11/6/12 12:23 PM, jan iversen wrote: > On 6 November 2012 11:58, Dwayne Bailey wrote: > >> On 6 November 2012 10:25, jan iversen wrote: >> >>> I prefer .xlif because it is easier to handle, and I do not need to store >>> information (like module/source file) in comments. >>> >> >> You still n

Re: Unprocessed solaris bugs

On 12/3/12 3:55 PM, Jean-Louis 'Hans' Fuchs wrote: > Hello > > I have reported the following bugs in april: > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120751 > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119253 > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119252 > https://issues.apach

Re: correct response to finding previous found bug?

On 12/4/12 8:52 AM, Lucas Burson wrote: > Hi, > > I was doing some regression testing on Ubuntu and discovered a bug > which was already reported [1]. It's about 3 months old. > That got me wondering, is there some "best practice" (or something) to > update a previously found bug? In bugzilla, sho

Re: L10n tools is no longer needed.

On 12/2/12 7:12 PM, janI wrote: > thanks rob for clarifying it. > > It just shows how wrong my thought were, but I have been searching to find > documentation on the split, reasons why, person conflicts etc...that seems > buried quite deep (maybe for good reasons), and the IBM approach to LO also

[RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

Hi, based on some earlier discussion I think we have reached more common consensus that we 1. want release further languages for AOO 3.4 1 and 2. how we can do that. To make it more concrete I have created a new wiki page [1] where I would like to document the release process, the proposed releas

Re: XForms support plans?

On 11/30/12 2:18 PM, Davide Dozza wrote: > Hi all, > > recently I've been involved in developing some Xforms with AOO for an > italian PA. > > It seems the Xforms development is stop since 2006 and I'd like to know > if there is any plan about this promising technology. > > In particular I've no

Re: XForms support plans?

On 12/4/12 3:21 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> On 11/30/12 2:18 PM, Davide Dozza wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> recently I've been involved in developing some Xforms with AOO for an >>> italian PA. >

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

On 12/4/12 10:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote: >> On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >>> having all language packs built, not advertising them on our website >>> (that said, note that the dev. snapshots hosted on people.apache.org are >>> advertise

Re: correct response to finding previous found bug?

On 12/5/12 5:34 AM, Lucas Burson wrote: >> Do you know C++? Are you willing to dive into the source? I/we can give >> a hand and point you where to look. > > I do know C++ (and xslt, if it's anywhere) and I am willing to play > with source. The downside is that I've never worked on a project of >

Re: hello everybody.

On 12/5/12 2:50 AM, nimes raut wrote: > hi, my name is asim raut from nepal.i study management course online from > u.s.i love trekking,rafting,cycling.in my spare time ,i love to read > books,watch movies and enjoy listening songs. > > asim raut >

Re: XForms support plans?

arch. It is probably the easiest way to find the related sources. Juergen > > > Best regards > Chong Minsk > > > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 12/4/12 3:21 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:51

Re: [RELEASE] AOO.next = AOO 4.0

On 12/6/12 11:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/12/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> What was the outcome of this thread? Is trunk in 4.0 mode? >> Andrea update to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/f8KoAQ >> suggests so (I may have missed some mail telling so). > > No formal mail was se

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

ed the range object. Juergen > > Thanks again, > Robert > > > I just double-checked, I did attach a file (puh!) and it must have been > removed by mailing list policies. > > But I will follow Oliver's suggestion and file a bug first. > > Thanks for your hel

Re: [RELEASE] Update 4.0 planning items

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/7/12 3:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:55:23AM -0500, TJ Frazier wrote: >> The "Encryption GUI" item has not attracted a sponsor. I added >> this per the resolution of a very long discussion in BZ [1]. >> Subseq

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/7/12 5:21 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:01:42PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> B. change the existing (not published) API and replace the first >> argument "string" to "XTextRan

Re: Stickers AOO

On 12/10/12 7:25 AM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote: > Hi > > I am researching to make stickerts for notebook/macbooks, and I've > finding old arts[1][2]. > > We can create new arts. :-) We should create something new ;-) Juergen > > 1 - http://templates.services.openoffice.org/en/node/4487 > 2 -

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

On 12/8/12 8:36 AM, janI wrote: > On 8 December 2012 00:34, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti >> wrote: >>> On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote: We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat

Re: Afrikaans Language Pack

Hi Rudi, welcome at Apache OpenOffice and thanks for your interest to help us with the translation for Africans. Fist of all you have send your mail to a mailing list where you have to subscribe to receive the replies. See http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html for more details about our

Re: Hello

On 12/10/12 2:45 PM, Sidhartha Mani wrote: > Hello, > > I am Sidhartha. I am new to apache software foundation and open source > software development. I use openoffice spreadsheet, presentation and text > document for my assignments at university. I like it a lot and want to > contribute in whiche

Re: [proposal] manual create new user on upgraded wiki

On 12/10/12 5:33 PM, janI wrote: > to me it is a long term solution +1 when taking into account that we have 10 or less requests per month Juergen > > alternatives are: > > 1) open up, and get spam > 2) use some of the spam measures, like e.g. cool off period = 4 days. > > The most effici

Re: [proposal] manual create new user on upgraded wiki

On 12/10/12 5:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI wrote: >> we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are >> very low and since the "normal" spam measures have received a -1, I propose >> the following for the new Wiki. >> > > What was the

Re: Script to get infos about development snapshot differences

On 12/10/12 6:29 PM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > As we want more regular snapshots it is interesting to know what > happened to code since the last snapshot. > > To get such info automatically I created a python script named > svnlog2info.py [1] which creates a html file for such a revision range. > >

Re: Learn SVN, and remove item

On 12/11/12 3:46 PM, Albino Biasutti Neto wrote: > Hi > > How do I remove the word "incubating" the images ? the related image source files have to be changed. But maybe we should wait a little bit longer on the output of the branding efforts to avoid duplicate work. Juergen > > I want help th

Spam in the extensions repo comments?

Hi, I browsed the extension repo to look for the LanguageTool extension and noticed the last 2 comments which are spam. Can an administrator delete these comments and this user. If possible all comments by this user. It seems we have to take care of new users here as well. Juergen

Re: [proposal] manual create new user on upgraded wiki

; is my primary task to get that done in a secure way and in way I believe is > correct, if anybody has a different opinion of my role as maintainer, > please say so. > > And please do not misunderstand me, I think it is cool that our community > likes to discuss so much and once we ge

Re: Spam in the extensions repo comments?

On 12/12/12 12:57 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I browsed the extension repo to look for the LanguageTool extension and >> noticed the last 2 comments which are spam. >> >> Can an ad

Re: Admin mailing list?

On 12/13/12 7:06 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> If we're going to have all of these wiki account requests via email, >> would it makes sense to create a special admin list (or webmaster >> list) for these and similar requests, and maybe also for gener

Re: Native lang, pootle information needs changes...

On 12/20/12 9:30 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> We have Native Language information on the project web site: >> http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.htm >> which also directs folks to a local Pootle User Guide on the wiki: >> http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Pootle_User_Guide

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

On 12/20/12 6:14 AM, Shenfeng Liu wrote: > imacat, > Your comments are so professional! :-) > Personally I like this logo design more comparing to other candidates in > wiki. > Thanks Michael! > While we may als

Re: [proposal] Adopt palette to Symphony palette partially

On 12/20/12 2:36 PM, Kevin Grignon wrote: > > > On Dec 20, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Armin Le Grand wrote: > >>Hi Kevin, >> >> On 20.12.2012 12:01, Kevin Grignon wrote: >> snip >>> >>> Armin, >>> >>> Great enhancement. In fact this is in the UX backlog. >> >> Yes, it is, but we need to disc

Re: Is support for legacy file formats saved?

On 12/20/12 8:17 PM, Ralf Lehmeier wrote: > Hello! > LO has removed all files with the 4.0 up to and including StarOffice 5.2 > support. > LO 4.0 with the old files can no longer work. > What is the plan in AOO? Will there be support for this in the future too? > no, we plan to drop these old for

Re: [PROPOSAL] New Apache OpenOffice 4 logo proposals...

On 12/21/12 3:47 AM, Michael Acevedo wrote: > Hello again AOO team. > > As promised, I've 5 additional modified logos for the project (the last > jpeg attachment I sent with 4 logos was modified a bit with logos 1 and > 3 being slightly tweaked) and can be found in the Cwiki at: > > https://cwiki

Re: [proposal] Add Symphony gradients

On 12/21/12 12:19 PM, Armin Le Grand wrote: > Hi List, > > okay, added and comitted. > > I played around with an office where these are installed, it's really > much better to use these gradients. > I would even propose to move them to the top of the list, so that they > will be seen immediat

Re: Is support for legacy file formats saved?

On 12/21/12 2:00 PM, Ralf Lehmeier wrote: > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >> On 12/20/12 8:17 PM, Ralf Lehmeier wrote: >>> Hello! >>> LO has removed all files with the 4.0 up to and including StarOffice 5.2 >>> support. >>> LO 4.0 with the old files can no l

[RELEASE] Respin snapshot builds for early verification available

Hi, before I go on Christmas vacation I have built snapshots for our upcoming AOO 3.4.1 respin to support further languages. I create a build for Danish, Swedish, Polish, Norwegian Bokmal, Scottish Gaelic and Korean. Danish is not 100% up-to-date because we ran in some errors. I will prepare a n

Re: Incompatible changes in AOO 4.0 ?

On 1/1/13 10:52 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hi again; > > - Messaggio originale - >> Da: Rob Weir > >> >> So there are two things here: >> >> 1) All the junk out to the 12th decimal place that might matter to a >> few people and which might be improved by moving to boost >> > > I think t

Re: User initiative for improving OOXML (was Re: AOO questions on Google)

On 12/25/12 5:50 AM, Drew Jensen wrote: > Thanks for that - I knew of that initiative. Does the project intend to > integrate their work? sure, OOXML can't be ignored and we are interested in the work. I think it was the main intention to make the "paid" work available in both AOO and LibreOffice

Re: User initiative for improving OOXML (was Re: AOO questions on Google)

portant to have a good OOXML support as well in the future to continue the game. Juergen > > Thanks > > Drew > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 12/25/12 5:50 AM, Drew Jensen wrote: >>> Thanks for that - I knew of that i

[RELEASE]: 1 day left for new/updated translations for AOO 3.4.1

Hi, this is just a friendly reminder for our translation deadline tomorrow Jan 4th, 2013. But if you don't make the date, our next release is not too far away and we are looking forward to release even more languages for AOO 4.0. Please provide information about used dictionaries as well that we

Re: [RELEASE]: 1 day left for new/updated translations for AOO 3.4.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 1/3/13 1:34 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:14:03PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> this is just a friendly reminder for our translation deadline >> tomorrow Jan 4th, 2013. But

Re: [RELEASE]: 1 day left for new/updated translations for AOO 3.4.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 1/3/13 2:08 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 01:55:42PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>> Yesterday while building yesterday I realized there are several >>> resources that are not being translate

Re: Version 3.5 or is it 4.0 ??

On 1/4/13 8:29 AM, Drew Jensen wrote: > Howdy, > > Sorry, if this is old stuff - I don't really see an answer in the mail > archive (not saying it isn't there). > > This is kind of in response to Shenfeng Liu's response, which I just read, > on the thread deailing the top 10 questions blog. He wr

Re: Version 3.5 or is it 4.0 ??

g good progress with the framework. It's still some work to do ;-) Juergen > > > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 1/4/13 8:29 AM, Drew Jensen wrote: >>> Howdy, >>> >>> Sorry, if this is old stuff - I

Re: [UX] UI options for document encryption

y reason for SHA256 is to make it slightly harder for someone to discover > the password from the protection key. > > Since the protection key value is not a secret and it is easily extracted > from the document, SHA256 versus (160-bit) SHA1 is not a big improvement. > Pa

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >