On 20.06.2013 22:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
RGB ES wrote:
2013/6/20 FR web forum
https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192
Is it correct?
AFAIK, several icons on the sidebar comes from Symphony's sidebar. Maybe
the path just reflects the picture origin.
Indeed. I
On 20.06.2013 21:04, RGB ES wrote:
2013/6/20 Hagar Delest
Confirmed on:
AOO400m1(Build:9700)
2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64
NB: same with the Find toolbar.
Indeed. I filled this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122567
This is a really problematic
Hello Juergen,
I mean if "getPropertyValues" is requested for non-existing content what is
the exception that must be thrown?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The explanation for "insert" command is not cl
On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
> Hello Juergen,
>
> I mean if "getPropertyValues" is requested for non-existing content what is
> the exception that must be thrown?
I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't
remember for sure...
But the UCP handles or commu
Hi,
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Yes. please allow to share the following objections: 1. in general,
bugs shouldn't be rated
I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a
priority. And as always you can't fix them all w
On 6/21/13 9:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote:
>> Hello Juergen,
>>
>> I mean if "getPropertyValues" is requested for non-existing content what is
>> the exception that must be thrown?
>
> I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Yes.
please allow to share the following objections:
1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated
I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a
priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a
Hi,
On 11.06.2013 12:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
I just want to mention issue 122331 [1].
It is about a missing logo/image in the first visible dialog on the
Windows installation.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122331
Best regards, Oliver.
On 11.06.2013 10:38, Jü
Hello Rob,
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
> Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Jörg Schmidt
>
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote:
Yes.
please allow to share the following objections:
1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated
I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a
priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a
Hello Juergen,
If I have to create new content, where do I obtain the properties of the
content. InsertCommandArgument2 has no attribute to store the content
Properties.
For example to insert a folder - what is its "Title" ?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> On 6/21/13
Hello Juergen,
the decription of "insert" some what makes it clear:
This command inserts a new content. It commits the process of
// creating a new content via executing the command "createNewContent"
// and initializing it via setting properties, afterwards.
// The command is not called on th
On 20.06.2013 17:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 06.06.2013 13:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to
be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release
blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field
j...@apache.org has granted fanyuz...@gmail.com's request for
4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 121880: Find and Replace fails unless case is matched
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121880
--- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org
set showstopper flag
--
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann has canceled fanyuz...@gmail.com's
request for 4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 122435: CRASH at first launch
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122435
--- Additional Comments from Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
I could not reproduce the defect in current snapshot - AOO4
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello Rob,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt
>> Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-we
On 20.06.2013 17:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 06.06.2013 13:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to
be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release
blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field
2013/6/21 Andre Fischer
> On 20.06.2013 21:33, RGB ES wrote:
>
>> 2013/6/20 Rob Weir
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, RGB ES wrote:
>>>
2013/6/20 Hagar Delest
Confirmed on:
> AOO400m1(Build:9700)
> 2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64
>
>
Hi All,
We wrap up the AOO 4.0 Full Regression test this week, here is the weekly
update (6/17 - 6/21):
*Test execution:*
1. Testing of silent installation on Windows, it is passed in WinXP while
failed in Win7
Bug 122560 - msiexec installation only possible with parameter "/i"
2. Full/Final Re
We've published a security bulletin and patch for the Apache
OpenOffice 3.4.1 SDK.
Due to a flaw in JavaDoc generated API documentation, one of the files
in the 3.4.1 SDK is vulnerable to an HTML frame injection attack.
Details on the issue, and a patched HTML file, can be found here:
http://www
Hello,
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > What is the problem?
> >
>
> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
> and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
> The website says it is from "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.
On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
What is the problem?
The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
The website says it is from "Verein
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
But on the other hand the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.." isn't
any old third
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>> > What is the problem?
>> >
>>
>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>> and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product.
>> The
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Junge wrote:
> On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>>
>>
What is the problem?
>>>
>>> The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed
>>> and approved for r
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>
> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
>
> But on the other han
Thank you, i did it, I've been kind of busy at my job, but this weekend i'm
going to be working in the project
El jun 14, 2013 11:01 PM, "Raphael Bircher" escribió:
> Hi
>
> Am 15.06.13 05:43, schrieb Ivan Fuentes:
>
>> I know i followed all the instructuctions...I could fix that error,
>> No
Hello everybody!
I'm Piotr and at this time I help to develop the german AOO Website.
I have contributed some changes that Jörg and I talked about in the german
mailing list.
So if you have any question to me, i am now on the international developer
mailing list.
greetings
Piotr
---
2013/6/21 Rob Weir
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
> >
> > I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
> > ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutsch
> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?*
>
> As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must
> be hosted by
> Apache infrastructure(*),
If the Apache to want that's OK.
But please check it out my prob
> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>
> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
> product of the
> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..".
No, that's not right!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
>
>> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?*
>>
>> As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must
>> be hosted by
>> Apache infrastructure(*),
>
> If th
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 20, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> > In case you are not following the discussion on the dev list, Juergen,
> > the 4.0 Release Manager, has proposed an endgame schedule for the AOO
> > 4.0 release:
> >
> >
> http://mail-archi
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>
>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the
>> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies Of
Am 21.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>> From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
>
>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>
>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a
>> product of the
>> ASF but distributed by the "Verein Freies
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly.
>>>
>>> I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
>
>> Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir:
>>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann
>>> wrote:
Hi Rob,
I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drastic
> From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de]
> Someone is responsible for the box and it semms to me, it's
> not the ASF.
> So we have to make clear, who's the legal entity distributing the box
> (even it's a gift).
The legal entity is, in this case, formally an group
Hi! Can you help me change the language of the entire office program? i
just bought this used computer and its all in Spanish
Thank you,
Kristen
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:28:08 -0600
Kristen Todd wrote:
> Hi! Can you help me change the language of the entire office program? i
> just bought this used computer and its all in Spanish
>
> Thank you,
>
> Kristen
Download the appropriate Language Pack from
http://www.openoffice.org/download
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Piotr Bala wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm Piotr and at this time I help to develop the german AOO Website.
> I have contributed some changes that Jörg and I talked about in the german
> mailing list.
>
> So if you have any question to me, i am now on the inter
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 11.06.2013 12:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just want to mention issue 122331 [1].
>> It is about a missing logo/image in the first visible dialog on the
>> Windows installation.
>>
>> [1] https://i
> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
> My recollection of the discussion was.
>
> (1) Have a 3rd party page.
>
> (2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page.
>
> (3) Each language can have their own news feed.
>
> (4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page.
>
> C
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
> page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
> directly. That is my understanding, at least.
>
> It could say, for example, "PrOOo Box now release
I did not reported this yet.
Download this document
http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt
On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment
inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor
jumps to the heading instead of remaining where y
2013/6/21 RGB ES
> I did not reported this yet.
>
> Download this document
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt
>
> On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment
> inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor
> jumps to the he
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>
>> I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted
>> page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page
>> directly. That is my understanding, at l
I am getting error ( accessing your personal settings or your Personal
settings are blocked. I am operating windows 7. Can you tel me how to
correct this error.
Thank you
wc...@att.net
615 459-7924
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Hi,
2013/6/22, RGB ES :
> 2013/6/21 RGB ES
>
>> I did not reported this yet.
>>
>> Download this document
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt
>>
>> On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a
>> comment
>> inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text
Hello,
I wanted to convert an XInputStream into java.io.InputStream.
I found this on the mail archive.
http://markmail.org/message/fo2txhbgxu3ksnct
This is a very old mail.
So, just asking if such a conversion api has been defined now.
What is the best way to do this conversion?
--
Rajath S,
M
Am 22.06.2013 00:04, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
> In my very first post on the topic, I wrote:
>
> "So one solution discussed was to do similar to what we do with the
> main English pages with winPenPack. We have a general page for 3rd
> party ports and distributions:
>
> http://www.openoffice.org/po
51 matches
Mail list logo
