> From: Peter Junge [mailto:peter.ju...@gmx.org]
> > *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?* > > As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must > be hosted by > Apache infrastructure(*), If the Apache to want that's OK. But please check it out my problem: if I develop something that is useful for the users of AOO, and I'm AOO community member, how can I tell you when I'm not allowed to talk about it? These are the facts: -I am member of the community for 8 years (first in OOo now at AOO) -the PrOOo-Box for years in Germany as the CD of the community known (and *not* as a product of a third party) -the PrOOo-box is only made by german AOO community members And all to what is going on is a temporary news-teaser. Is it the Apache-way to tell their own community members, no we do not want the reports to her about your work? May only be called public work of community members when it takes place on Apache sites? A news teaser is not a press release, not a privilege, it is only a piece of information for users. And please, let me put it exactly: the problem is not _the one_ teaser, the problem is my lack of understanding as we locally on site, can work for AOO when we officially allowed to say anything about it. The PrOOo box is a result of our work, the work of the German AOO community, why can not you report it? AND: *Why wants to Apache, we advertise [1] on the PrOOo box for Apache when it is not desired the other hand, we mention the PrOOo-box?* [1] That was the content of the request we received from tradema...@apache.org, because there was requested that we put a link to the project pages of Apache. We gladly accepted of course. Greetings, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
