Re: Hello!

Ruth Cunningham wrote: My name's Ruth Cunningham, from West London. I'm currently studying at University, interested in Social Research but looking to explore Marketing. Welcome, Ruth! If you want to help with marketing you will find information at http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/or

Re: [RELEASE] AOO.next = AOO 4.0

On 12/6/12 11:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/12/2012 Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >> What was the outcome of this thread? Is trunk in 4.0 mode? >> Andrea update to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/f8KoAQ >> suggests so (I may have missed some mail telling so). > > No formal mail was se

[QA] Two bugs very annoying for french users

Hello list, Since AOO 3.4.0, two issues with Calc are poisoning for french https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119177 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=120559 These bugs may be related. Many people have been reported on the FR forum and the advice is to "install LibO". Than

Re: [RELEASE] Update 4.0 planning items

On 12/6/2012 23:11, Shenfeng Liu wrote: Hi, all, I suggest we update the planning items in 4.0 wiki: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Planning I just updated the status of each items and added some more according to my reading of the mails. I hope ever

Re: [RELEASE] Update 4.0 planning items

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:55:23AM -0500, TJ Frazier wrote: > The "Encryption GUI" item has not attracted a sponsor. I added this > per the resolution of a very long discussion in BZ [1]. Subsequently, > Jürgen wrote an extension to set "SHA256" mode, and I wrote a macro[2] > to toggle the setting

Re: Gallery extension from Symphony ressources

Hi Regina, On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 05:59:15PM +0100, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > Armin Le Grand schrieb: > > Hi Kevin and Marcus, > > > >let's wait and see if Regina may know/find a place in the office where > >this is needed. > > I see that the folder htmlexpo is used in File > Wi

Google Communities

Something new from Google: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2012/12/google-communities-and-photos.html As you probably know we already have a Google+ Page: https://plus.google.com/+openoffice A Google+ Page is primarily a one-to-many broadcast tool, like a Blog or a Twitter account or a Facebook pa

Problem with the installation

Hello, When I wanted to install your software Apache OpenOficce incubating 3.4.1.Win x86 install cs.exe my software COMODO Defense+ warned me that 1/ your software is requesting unlimited access to my komputer (see picture in enclosure) 2/ your software is not digitally signed (see picture in enc

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

On 11/23/12 6:56 PM, Robert Barbey wrote: > Here it is: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121391 Hi Robert, I took the time and looked in the patch. And I talked with Oliver about it and we have some questions/comments 1. the new method "commitTextMarkupRange" seems to be for conveni

Re: [RELEASE] Update 4.0 planning items

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/7/12 3:18 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:55:23AM -0500, TJ Frazier wrote: >> The "Encryption GUI" item has not attracted a sponsor. I added >> this per the resolution of a very long discussion in BZ [1]. >> Subseq

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:01:42PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > B. change the existing (not published) API and replace the first > argument "string" to "XTextRange". Is it a good idea to use a text range? this will allow modification of this text range, unless you make it read-only, if possible

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 12/7/12 5:21 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:01:42PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> B. change the existing (not published) API and replace the first >> argument "string" to "XTextRange". > > Is it a good idea to us

[UX] UI options for document encryption

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:19:11PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> The "Encryption GUI" item has not attracted a sponsor. I added > >> this per the resolution of a very long discussion in BZ [1]. > >> Subsequently, Jürgen wrote an extension to set "SHA256" mode, and > >> I wrote a macro[2] to tog

[Review before commit] Error in main/sysui/desktop/debian/makefile.mk

I have had a problem building sysui on ubuntu, it comes up with an error that directory $(MISC)$/$(@:b) had the wrong permission (needed 755 < x < 775 and got 757) I traced the problem to the makefile.mk, please see the diff: Index: makefile.mk

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 12/7/12 5:21 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:01:42PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> B. change the existing (not published) API and replace t

Re: [Proposal] Create new mailing list: d...@openoffice.apache.org

Hi 2012/12/3 Rob Weir : > Moderators: Please respond if you can volunteer as moderator. We > should aim for 2 or 3 geographically dispersed. We have sereval volunteer as moderator. :-) > I'll wait 72 hours, and if no objections we can ask Andrea to submit > the form for the new list creation.

RE: [UX] UI options for document encryption

Please see in addressing security vs protection in the UX also. 1. CHOICE OF ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM It is important to appreciate that there is no recommendation about AES for the ODF 1.2 manifest:algorithm-name. The only mandated algorithm

Re: [UX] UI options for document encryption

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 10:26:02AM -0800, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Please see in > addressing security vs protection in the UX also. [...] very interesting, but this is another topic! Post another mail, find UX advice and lazy consensus, a

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

Am Freitag, 7. Dezember 2012 um 18:09 schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:35:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > On 12/7/12 5:21 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 05:01:42PM +0100, J

Re: [Call-for-Review] Extension to XSmartTagRecognizer interface

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 07:56:12PM +0100, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > > Yes, but it look like the design was not to give access to the text > > range, but a string; I tend to think the underlying reason was that > > giving a text range is not safe. > > > > > > I tend to agree, but in related Smar

Re: FAQ page (Re: IPAD)

Marcus (Ono) wrote: Am 12/03/2012 11:11 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 12/03/2012 09:19 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Rob Weir wrote: On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

RE: [UX] UI options for document encryption

I've given some of the technical considerations behind security and protection provisions for ODF 1.0/1.1/1.2 documents. I think for usability and UX, there are the following considerations: 1. Choices offered to users are ones for which informed decisions can be made and there is clear gui

[Proposal] Update and merge User FAQ's from Web ite and mwiiki

Based on extended discussions on this list at: http://markmail.org/search/+list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev#query:%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.ooo-dev+page:1+mid:pkyogj4m45anxuxg+state:results. I propose to start merging and updating the User FAQ's from the website into the current structure

Re: Problem with the installation

S Vilcko wrote: When I wanted to install your software Apache OpenOficce incubating 3.4.1.Win x86 install cs.exe ... 1/ Why does your software regests unlimited access to my computer? 2/ Why is your software not digitally signed and shouldn’t be trusted? Hi, indeed the OpenOffice installation n

Re: [Proposal] Update and merge User FAQ's from Web ite and mwiiki

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > Based on extended discussions on this list at: > http://markmail.org/search/+list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev#query:%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.ooo-dev+page:1+mid:pkyogj4m45anxuxg+state:results. > I propose to start merging and updating

Re: [Proposal] Update and merge User FAQ's from Web ite and mwiiki

Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: Based on extended discussions on this list at: http://markmail.org/search/+list:org.apache.incubator.ooo-dev#query:%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.ooo-dev+page:1+mid:pkyogj4m45anxuxg+state:results. I propose to start merging

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote: We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat and overwhelming the people.apache.org server. This specific issue has now been solved by invoking policy (so, we will be able to put builds on people.apac

Re: Completed Infrastructure Module

Samer-- Thank you so much for keeping us informed about your progress on these modules... Right now, this link to OpenOffice's BZ instance seems to work, but perhaps it didn't for some reason when you tried it. Thanks for your interest in Apache OpenOffice. On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Samer

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote: >> >> We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million >> uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat and overwhelming >> the people.apache.org server. > > > This specific issue has now been solv

Re: "dist" move...

On 06/12/2012 Marcus (OOo) wrote: So, don't we need to switch to "http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/"; here as well? It seems that the pre-graduation builds are kept archived under /incubator in general and not moved, compare for example PDFBox: - http://archive.apache.org/dist/incuba

calc spreadsheet data validate window: 'Value' field not checked

Hi, I'm doing a regression test on a Calc spreadsheet using data validity for cells. It appears that if you open the validity window (toolbar Data -> Validity) the 'Value' box isn't checked against the allowed type. I don't see it in BZ... but I haven't used search enough to be sure. Or maybe I'm

Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1

On 8 December 2012 00:34, Rob Weir wrote: > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > > On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote: > >> > >> We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million > >> uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat and overwhelming > >> the people.apac