On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 07:56:12PM +0100, Juergen Schmidt wrote: > > Yes, but it look like the design was not to give access to the text > > range, but a string; I tend to think the underlying reason was that > > giving a text range is not safe. > > > > > > I tend to agree, but in related Smarttags actions you will get the > text range object anyway.
But this is the intended design: concurrent smart tag processing, while I assume that actions are not invoked concurrently: the user can select only one menu item at the time with one action. Concerning the proof reader, I don't have any at hand right now, but IIRC the text is underlined with a dotted light blue line. I'll have to try the LanguageTool to see what offers the context menu in this case. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
pgppfdUcbEw3Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
