Re: build breaks with: osl/unx/mutex.c:69: undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np'

Strange it seems my repository is completly messed up by an unintended merge. I start over and report back. Am 22.12.22 um 12:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski: Is this trunk, AOO42X or AOO41X ? On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:01 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello All, I try to build OpenOffice on Ubuntu 22.04.1

Re: build breaks with: osl/unx/mutex.c:69: undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np'

Is this trunk, AOO42X or AOO41X ? > On Dec 21, 2022, at 1:01 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello All, > > I try to build OpenOffice on Ubuntu 22.04.1 > > It seems that the macro flag "Linux" has not set. Anyone had this issue? > > > All the best > > Peter > > > -

build breaks with: osl/unx/mutex.c:69: undefined reference to `pthread_mutexattr_setkind_np'

Hello All, I try to build OpenOffice on Ubuntu 22.04.1 It seems that the macro flag "Linux" has not set. Anyone had this issue? All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For addition

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

Jim Jagielski wrote: So our options are: 1. We stick w/ CentOS5 as our ref build system for 4.2.0 but force Gnome VFS. 2. We move to CentOS6, accept the default of GIO but understand that this moves CentOS5 as a non-supported OS for our community builds. 3. Just as we offer L

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

Jim Jagielski wrote: Who has write access to that? The main OpenOffice site is in our source repository, so all committers have access to it. But for some reason we don't post news there, even though we have an (outdated) news archive there. The OpenOffice blog https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

Who has write access to that? > On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Why don't we post that on our www.openoffice.org blog? > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> http://jimjag.com/imo/index.php?/archives/272-The-Path-to- >> Apache-OpenOffice-4.2.0.ht

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

Why don't we post that on our www.openoffice.org blog? On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > http://jimjag.com/imo/index.php?/archives/272-The-Path-to- > Apache-OpenOffice-4.2.0.html php?/archives/272-The-Path-to-Apache-OpenOffice-4.2.0.html> > >

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

http://jimjag.com/imo/index.php?/archives/272-The-Path-to-Apache-OpenOffice-4.2.0.html > On Dec 4, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Sounds like a good topic for a blog post... Our current > discu

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

>>>>>>> On 30/11/2017 Jim Jagielski wrote: >>>>>>>> I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a >> supported >>>>>>>> build system... I ran into a LOT of issues. >>>>>>> >>>&g

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

>>>>>> I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a >supported >>>>>>> build system... I ran into a LOT of issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> Such as, for example? >>>>>

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

;> o zip 3.0. >>>> o GIO >>>> >>>> >>> If you *really* need GIO, try adding --disable-gio --enable-gnome-vfs to >>> ./configure. >>> >> >> The issue is that CentOS5 simply does not and can not provide GIO. >> So it is, IMO at least, unsuitable for our reference community >> build platform. >> >> This was brought up on the "AOO 4.2.0-dev builds" thread. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: 4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

GIO > >> > >> > > If you *really* need GIO, try adding --disable-gio --enable-gnome-vfs to > > ./configure. > > > > The issue is that CentOS5 simply does not and can not provide GIO. > So it is, IMO at least, unsuitable for our reference community > build platform. > > This was brought up on the "AOO 4.2.0-dev builds" thread.

4.2.0: Baseline CentOS6 as reference build platform

-disable-gio --enable-gnome-vfs to > ./configure. > The issue is that CentOS5 simply does not and can not provide GIO. So it is, IMO at least, unsuitable for our reference community build platform. This was brought up on the "AOO 4.2.0-dev builds" thread.

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

Yes, I had the array activity in mind. I am suggesting to do the same for pointers and references. I am unsure which std methods are available in gcc version 4.1 or 4.4 however we could maybe in case of smart and weak pointers fall back to boost if not available in the compiler. By this we can

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

I have suggested a refactoring pass to make more use of STL structures instead of fixed size, unchecked arrays. Some security problem would be caught by array bounds checking. We have some new volunteers over on the recruitment mailing list. I think refactoring would be a good project for gett

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

Good points! But we need to address the dependency aging anyways. Because modern system having difficulties with our code. We must develop a plan how we modernise the code. How about support by version: With 4.x we will support whatever we have today. 5.x will be on newer compiler dependency. M

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

On 14 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote: > On 14 Aug, Peter kovacs wrote: >> Sorry, for my bad english. >> I meant that I think that some of the functionality which we have >> implemented in helper functions in the past can be retired by using >> modern c++11 and later standards. The code wi

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

On 14 Aug, Peter kovacs wrote: > Sorry, for my bad english. > I meant that I think that some of the functionality which we have > implemented in helper functions in the past can be retired by using > modern c++11 and later standards. The code will be smaller,and > according to Bjarne Stroustrup als

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

Sorry, for my bad english. I meant that I think that some of the functionality which we have implemented in helper functions in the past can be retired by using modern c++11 and later standards. The code will be smaller,and according to Bjarne Stroustrup also faster. I also would like to limit if

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

Am 14.08.2017 um 19:38 schrieb Peter kovacs: I am going through the code, when I have little time left. :-) There is a lot of code I think we don't need the modern implementation should provide us similar functionality. What do you mean with "modern implementation". Should newer libaries

Weak reference helper implementations

Hello devs, I am going through the code, when I have little time left. There is a lot of code I think we don't need the modern implementation should provide us similar functionality. Is it okay if we target to get rid of such old Code? Btw. There is a code for a workaround of a bug from gcc ve

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

On 23.10.2016 11:46, Jose R R wrote: GCC 6 will not build the OpeonOffice suite; however, GCC 5 will happily build the Apache professional office suite application. Well, lets see if that can be fixed. Please be aware that there is currently a bug affecting GCC 6.2.0-7 (and up) < https://bu

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > > > On 23.10.2016 08:33, Jose R R wrote: >> >> Niltze [Hello], Peter- > > Niltze Jose, >> >> >> I recently built Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC prior to GA on Debian Sid >> (bleeding-edge ;-) for AMD64 architecture. > > :-) >> >> I built DEB an

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

lding_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step ; this possibly need some major reworking to improve readability. Feel free to suggest and (if you wish) to ask for an account to improve this yourself. Which Versions do our build bots use? I think they should be the reference or? ... I am not sure if I was readable.

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

On 23.10.2016 08:33, Jose R R wrote: Niltze [Hello], Peter- Niltze Jose, I recently built Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC prior to GA on Debian Sid (bleeding-edge ;-) for AMD64 architecture. :-) I built DEB and RPM packages for Debian (and derivatives like Ubuntu) and RedHat (and derivatives, l

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

gt;>> However when working through the requirements I noticed that >>> gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler >> >> >> Where? When you cite the wiki please always send the link, since there are >> a lot of outdated pages that are not marked as such (by the

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

On 23.10.2016 00:29, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) Good! However when working through the requirements I noticed that gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler Where? When you cite the wiki please always send the link, since

Re: reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

Peter Kovacs wrote: I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) Good! However when working through the requirements I noticed that gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler Where? When you cite the wiki please always send the link, since there are a lot of outdated pages that are not

reference gcc compiler (wiki - Linux entry)

Hello all, I try to build OpenOffice on my machine (yea!) However when working through the requirements I noticed that gcc 4.2.3 is the current reference compiler Since I use Arch (and I expect similar for gentoo) I have GCC 6.2.1 20160830 installed I wonder if the release driven Distros

review requested: [Issue 118023] Calc: Cut-and-paste between spreadsheets causes incorrect cell reference changes : [Attachment 85284] Hack: skip reference updates for inter-document clipboard paste

dam...@apache.org has asked for review: Issue 118023: Calc: Cut-and-paste between spreadsheets causes incorrect cell reference changes https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118023 Attachment 85284: Hack: skip reference updates for inter-document clipboard paste https://bz.apache.org/ooo

4.1.2_release_blocker granted: [Issue 124712] Build broken on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 (undefined reference to __cxa_atexit)

Andrea Pescetti has granted Andrea Pescetti 's request for 4.1.2_release_blocker: Issue 124712: Build broken on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 (undefined reference to __cxa_atexit) https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124712 --- Comment #28 from Andrea Pescetti --- Now committed to AOO41

4.1.2_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124712] Build broken on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 (undefined reference to __cxa_atexit)

Andrea Pescetti has asked for 4.1.2_release_blocker: Issue 124712: Build broken on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 (undefined reference to __cxa_atexit) https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124712 --- Comment #27 from Andrea Pescetti --- As discussed: this is needed for a clean build on Ubuntu 14.04

Re: Change contact on Reference List

hrieb David Sterr: I want to change my entry on the reference list (old company) - can you please tell me, who I have to contact for this matter? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional com

Change contact on Reference List

Hello, I want to change my entry on the reference list (old company) - can you please tell me, who I have to contact for this matter? Thank you in advance and best regards, David

Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:03:04AM +0100, jan i wrote: > > To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can > get > > VMs if we want to and manage them ourself. > > That sound interesting. Can you outline the proced

Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 08:03:04AM +0100, jan i wrote: > To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can get > VMs if we want to and manage them ourself. That sound interesting. Can you outline the procedure to get one, or point to the respective documentation? Regards --

Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/27/2015 11:42 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:36:51PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hello; >> >> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL, >> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves

Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:36:51PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL, > it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there. > I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular > since it'

Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

On 03/26/2015 12:03 AM, jan i wrote: > On 26 March 2015 at 03:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > >> Hello; >> >> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL, >> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there. >> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely

Re: Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

On 26 March 2015 at 03:36, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL, > it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there. > I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular > since it's the last ver

Proposal: Bump CentOS reference distribution from 5 to 6

Hello; Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL, it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there. I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular since it's the last version without systemd. This would put up less pressure on in

Re: Openoffice.DE: Request to be added as reference member

Am 07/22/2014 02:05 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Copying the (international) dev list for tacit approval. If nobody objects within 3 days, people who are maintaining the German page http://www.openoffice.org/de/marketing/referenzkunden.html will add you. Note: in general we don't link to third-pa

Re: Openoffice.DE: Request to be added as reference member

Copying the (international) dev list for tacit approval. If nobody objects within 3 days, people who are maintaining the German page http://www.openoffice.org/de/marketing/referenzkunden.html will add you. Note: in general we don't link to third-party sites, so the link to your company site may

review requested: [Bug 123910] The reference in validation condition change to #REF! in exported xls file : [Attachment 82187] Fix patch

Clarence GUO has asked for review: Bug 123910: The reference in validation condition change to #REF! in exported xls file https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123910 Attachment 82187: Fix patch https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=82187&action=edit --- Additi

review canceled: [Bug 123910] The reference in validation condition change to #REF! in exported xls file : [Attachment 82165] fix patch

Clarence GUO has canceled Clarence GUO 's request for review: Bug 123910: The reference in validation condition change to #REF! in exported xls file https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123910 Attachment 82165: fix patch https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=82165&ac

review requested: [Bug 123910] The reference in validation condition change to #REF! in exported xls file : [Attachment 82165] fix patch

Clarence GUO has asked for review: Bug 123910: The reference in validation condition change to #REF! in exported xls file https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123910 Attachment 82165: fix patch https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=82165&action=edit --- Additi

Re: [Translation] Reference to Symphony?

On 20.06.2013 22:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote: RGB ES wrote: 2013/6/20 FR web forum https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192 Is it correct? AFAIK, several icons on the sidebar comes from Symphony's sidebar. Maybe the path just reflects the picture origin. Indeed. I

Re: [Translation] Reference to Symphony?

RGB ES wrote: 2013/6/20 FR web forum https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192 Is it correct? AFAIK, several icons on the sidebar comes from Symphony's sidebar. Maybe the path just reflects the picture origin. Indeed. It's just an internal pathname, invisible to t

Re: [Translation] Reference to Symphony?

2013/6/20 FR web forum > Hello list, > Found on Pootle : > https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192 > Is it correct? > AFAIK, several icons on the sidebar comes from Symphony's sidebar. Maybe the path just reflects the picture origin. Regards Ricardo > >

[Translation] Reference to Symphony?

Hello list, Found on Pootle : https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192 Is it correct? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffi

Re: [UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

On 5/21/13 10:33 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 21.05.2013 10:03, Regina Henschel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: >>> On 5/18/13 8:14 PM, RGB ES wrote: >>>> On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the &g

Re: [UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

Hi, On 21.05.2013 10:03, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: On 5/18/13 8:14 PM, RGB ES wrote: On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the Cross-Reference tab on Fields→Others dialogue, using the space in a far better way Link to the post http

Re: [UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

Hi, Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: On 5/18/13 8:14 PM, RGB ES wrote: On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the Cross-Reference tab on Fields→Others dialogue, using the space in a far better way Link to the post http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=273543#p273543

Re: [UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

On 5/18/13 8:14 PM, RGB ES wrote: > On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the > Cross-Reference tab on Fields→Others dialogue, using the space in a far > better way > > Link to the post > http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=273543#p273543 >

[UI]Better use of space on Cross-Reference dialogue

On the EN forum you can find a mock-up that redistribute the Cross-Reference tab on Fields→Others dialogue, using the space in a far better way Link to the post http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?p=273543#p273543 link to the image http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/download

I NEED HELP!!!!!!! cppu.defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext(Reference* )- Server Win 2003

ion. at cppu.defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext(Reference* ) at uno.util.Bootstrap.defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext(String ini_file, IDictionaryEnumerator bootstrap_parameters) -- I use OpenOffice 3 a

Re: reference

Is there example of valid code for a combobox macro at Database Form?

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

of our BZ admins please remove the "podling" reference in the footer area for Apache OOo Bugzilla? Thanks. Hi, Kay, A little research in the BZ Help [1] reveals in Section 6.3.5 that the global footer is in a template, "global/footer.html.tmpl". AFAIK it will take root acc

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> HI -- >>>>> >>>>> Could one of our BZ admins please remove the "podling" reference in the >>>>> footer area for Apache OOo Bugzilla? Thanks. >>>>> >>>> Hi, Kay,

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > > > On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: > >> On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: > >>> HI -- > >>> > >>

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

On 12-11-15, at 19:47 , Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: >>> On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> HI -- >>>> >>>>

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

On Nov 15, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: >> On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> HI -- >>> >>> Could one of our BZ admins please remove the "podling" reference in the >>>

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: HI -- Could one of our BZ admins please remove the "podling" reference in the footer area for Apache OOo Bugzilla? Thanks. Hi, Kay, A little research in the BZ Help [1] reveals in Section 6.3.

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: HI -- Could one of our BZ admins please remove the "podling" reference in the footer area for Apache OOo Bugzilla? Thanks. Hi, Kay, A little research in the BZ Help [1] reveals in Section 6.3.

Re: Editing needed on BZ footer -- remove "podling" reference

On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote: HI -- Could one of our BZ admins please remove the "podling" reference in the footer area for Apache OOo Bugzilla? Thanks. Hi, Kay, A little research in the BZ Help [1] reveals in Section 6.3.5 that the global footer is in a templat