-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2015 11:42 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:36:51PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> Hello; >> >> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL, >> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there. >> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very pop ular >> since it's the last version without systemd. >> >> This would put up less pressure on infra for the buildbot and let us use >> by default a newer toolchain. > > -1 > > a) Centos 5 will get Maintenance Updates until March 31st, 2017 > http://wiki.centos.org/About/Product > > b) this change should be done in a major version change, as it breaks > compatibility in client code Do we have additional information on what some of these "breaks" might be? I can't fault your logic about this being the footing for a major version change, but if you could provide more detail for further discussion, this would be helpful. > > > Regards > - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - MzK “What is the point of being alive if you don't at least try to do something remarkable?” -- John Green, "An Abundance of Katherines" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVGIePAAoJEJ8zlgVF1GcuWu8H/3HvmEfZac6LxtoUUEGgPZpN d5TibPeQ8BGDJkxdYGA+93smg5javhEgLOsftd6LTVjFjGlZKHyAMT9GgZYoll6Q XvAPc4B7nm/1b8OKQX5K75z1IBemew6ciiyypyYKTPj60IS7Z6m4xznGb9xDSL8b EU7EdZzTevPWg6LPWFaj8XidTvvt/OmV/oanI13+VNZJD2xweor7AUoRUfLQ9eoA shsPQOah8QMUuwJlmRcMXRbKk7S9DHavqqg9VD4FJYfaswhbIkuDS3Q03d+l9GLC m+eLoO9HTl38Zj+YZRMid/tiNoo2CjxJ6lYHRhHHl9UsXhKISBfR3sdQojT/vb4= =AEjX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
