On 14 Aug, Peter kovacs wrote: > Sorry, for my bad english. > I meant that I think that some of the functionality which we have > implemented in helper functions in the past can be retired by using > modern c++11 and later standards. The code will be smaller,and > according to Bjarne Stroustrup also faster. I also would like to limit > if not ban usage of C code. It makes tmaintainability more difficult, > and I do not see the benefit. Honestly even less then the Java stuff. > I also don't like helper structures. It is a sign for weak > architecture in my eyes. (But that's naming and structuring of code) > > With our small team, I would opt always for less codelines if > possible. Limit is only readability. > > I would like to know if there is support from others to remove those > whenever possible with c++11 Or later code? Or what strategy do we > want to head out for.
I don't think we can depend on c++11 at this time. According to our build documentation for Windows, we can't use anything newer than MSVC 2008: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
