On 03/26/2015 12:03 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 26 March 2015 at 03:36, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello;
>>
>> Not that I care too much, but while CentOS 5 hasn't reached it EOL,
>> it doesn't make much sense to force ourselves to ship AOO there.
>> I think we should move to CentOS 6 which is likely to remain very popular
>> since it's the last version without systemd.
>>
> +1
This sounds reasonable to me.
>
>>
>> This would put up less pressure on infra for the buildbot and let us use
>> by default a newer toolchain.
>>
> To be fair, even has pretty much given up on AOO and buildbots, we can get
> VMs if we want to and manage them ourself.
I don't understand this last sentence. What does this mean really?
>
> rgds
> jan i.
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pedro.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
“What is the point of being alive if you don't
at least try to do something remarkable?”
-- John Green, "An Abundance of Katherines"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
