On 14 Aug, To: dev@openoffice.apache.org wrote: > On 14 Aug, Peter kovacs wrote: >> Sorry, for my bad english. >> I meant that I think that some of the functionality which we have >> implemented in helper functions in the past can be retired by using >> modern c++11 and later standards. The code will be smaller,and >> according to Bjarne Stroustrup also faster. I also would like to limit >> if not ban usage of C code. It makes tmaintainability more difficult, >> and I do not see the benefit. Honestly even less then the Java stuff. >> I also don't like helper structures. It is a sign for weak >> architecture in my eyes. (But that's naming and structuring of code) >> >> With our small team, I would opt always for less codelines if >> possible. Limit is only readability. >> >> I would like to know if there is support from others to remove those >> whenever possible with c++11 Or later code? Or what strategy do we >> want to head out for. > > I don't think we can depend on c++11 at this time. According to our > build documentation for Windows, we can't use anything newer than MSVC > 2008: > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10
... and the version of gcc in CentOS 5 is of a similar vintage. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
