I uploaded the current progress.
Am 31.03.23 um 08:48 schrieb Bidouille:
Hello Peter
Any news for this DATEDIFF PR?
:-)
- Mail original -
De: "Peter Kovacs"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 23 Octobre 2022 12:22:20
Objet: Re: Contribution/recruitment!
Am 2
- Mail original -
>> De: "Peter Kovacs"
>> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Envoyé: Dimanche 23 Octobre 2022 12:22:20
>> Objet: Re: Contribution/recruitment!
>>
>>
>> Am 22.10.22 um 11:57 schrieb Bidouille:
>> > I don't know why
Hello Peter
Any news for this DATEDIFF PR?
:-)
- Mail original -
> De: "Peter Kovacs"
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 23 Octobre 2022 12:22:20
> Objet: Re: Contribution/recruitment!
>
>
> Am 22.10.22 um 11:57 schrieb Bidouille:
> &
a PR.
- Mail original -
De: "Matthias Seidel"
À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Envoyé: Samedi 15 Octobre 2022 18:48:21
Objet: Re: Contribution/recruitment!
If this is an "easy hack" why is the issue open for 17 years?
:-D
Am 15.10.22 um 13:18 schrieb Bidouille:
You
gt; Objet: Re: Contribution/recruitment!
>
> If this is an "easy hack" why is the issue open for 17 years?
>
> :-D
>
> Am 15.10.22 um 13:18 schrieb Bidouille:
> > You have many easy hacks...
> > A good start to you would be have DATEDIFF fu
Hi Ahmed,
Am 15.10.22 um 00:38 schrieb medo medo:
Hello,I am trying to contribute to OpenOffice but I am totally lost,
what kind of lost do you have?
what should i try to explain? do you need help with code structures?
and not sure where to get started.
Honestly, I started with buil
- Mail original -
>> De: "medo medo"
>> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Envoyé: Samedi 15 Octobre 2022 00:38:24
>> Objet: Re: Contribution/recruitment!
>>
>> Hello,I am trying to contribute to OpenOffice but I am totally lost,
>> and not
You have many easy hacks...
A good start to you would be have DATEDIFF function in Calc:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=49467
:-)
- Mail original -
> De: "medo medo"
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Samedi 15 Octobre 2022 00:38:24
> Objet: Re: Co
Hello,I am trying to contribute to OpenOffice but I am totally lost, and not
sure where to get started.I am willing to code in C++.Thanks,Ahmed.
On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 10:51:03 PM GMT+2, Peter Kovacs
wrote:
Welcome Ahmed,
We can use your interest in PHP and also C++. From my poi
> What is the task and what should I do?
Hello Ahmed
Maybe working on most annoying bugs and release blockers for future 4.2.0 build
:-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Greetings,
Thanks Dave for providing me with the link.
Thanks Peter for your warm welcome. I am willing to start with making the
checks on the add-ons, and then dive into development later.
What is the task and what should I do?
Thanks,
Ahmed.
On Monday, May 16, 2022, 10:51:03 PM GMT+2, Pet
Welcome Ahmed,
We can use your interest in PHP and also C++. From my point of view you
decide where to dive into.
If you want to look at OpenOffice directly, I suggest you start with
building OpenOffice on your favourite plattform.
We help you with that.
The second Option is to help with
On 16/05/2022 17:27, medo medo wrote:
> Hello,I am Ahmed Aboubakr from Cairo, Egypt.I am interested in contributing
> to Openoffice project.
> I am not sure where should I get started.Thanks,Ahmed.
This page should help: https://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/
Then ask for further advice or gu
Hello,I am Ahmed Aboubakr from Cairo, Egypt.I am interested in contributing to
Openoffice project.
I am not sure where should I get started.Thanks,Ahmed.
Hello,
This is Ahmed Aboubakr, software developer from Cairo, Egypt.I am interested in
contributing to OpenOffice project, but when I try to subscribe to the
recruitment mailing list, I get the email bounced, with a failure notice that
this list has moved to volunteer!
So, I hope you provide me
Am 27.04.21 um 08:01 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
with respect to the renaming of recruitment@ into volunteer@:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:55:10PM +0100, Marcus wrote:
Am 15.01.21 um 21:13 schrieb Carl Marcum:
On 1/13/21 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
[ ... excessively coarse snip ... ]
So
Dear All,
with respect to the renaming of recruitment@ into volunteer@:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:55:10PM +0100, Marcus wrote:
> Am 15.01.21 um 21:13 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> > On 1/13/21 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
[ ... excessively coarse snip ... ]
> > > > So, w
+1
On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 9:29 PM Peter Kovacs wrote:
> For me, too. 'Thanks a lot Carl.
>
> On 07.02.21 16:41, Marcus wrote:
> > Am 07.02.21 um 16:36 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> >> The unsubscribe and help footer has been added to recruitment@ list.
> &
For me, too. 'Thanks a lot Carl.
On 07.02.21 16:41, Marcus wrote:
Am 07.02.21 um 16:36 schrieb Carl Marcum:
The unsubscribe and help footer has been added to recruitment@ list.
... and it's working for me.
Thanks
Marcus
On 1/25/21 6:45 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 1/19/21 12:23
Am 07.02.21 um 16:36 schrieb Carl Marcum:
The unsubscribe and help footer has been added to recruitment@ list.
... and it's working for me.
Thanks
Marcus
On 1/25/21 6:45 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 1/19/21 12:23 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 19.01.21 um 01:08 schrieb Carl Marcum:
On 1/17/21
Hi All,
The unsubscribe and help footer has been added to recruitment@ list.
Best regards,
Carl
On 1/25/21 6:45 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
On 1/19/21 12:23 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 19.01.21 um 01:08 schrieb Carl Marcum:
On 1/17/21 3:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 10/01/2021 Peter Kovacs wrote
people when they
ask for it on the list: Whimsy https://whimsy.apache.org/ ...
The moderators are Patricia, Andrea and Marcus.
I confirm that indeed I use Whimsy to help people unsubscribe the
recruitment list when their intention is clear and when they are
confused about how to do it. I hope the
Am 17.01.21 um 15:41 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
because everyone (else) seems to agree on volunteer@ please note it's
fine for me. Please do _not_ consider my vote for recruitment@ as a
veto (in case you were in doubt :-).
I've created a Jira issue for Infra:
https://issues.apach
: Whimsy https://whimsy.apache.org/ ...
The moderators are Patricia, Andrea and Marcus.
I confirm that indeed I use Whimsy to help people unsubscribe the
recruitment list when their intention is clear and when they are
confused about how to do it. I hope the new footer will help limit
these cases
moderators are Patricia, Andrea and Marcus.
I confirm that indeed I use Whimsy to help people unsubscribe the
recruitment list when their intention is clear and when they are
confused about how to do it. I hope the new footer will help limit
these cases.
So should I go ahead with this if we
Marcus.
I confirm that indeed I use Whimsy to help people unsubscribe the
recruitment list when their intention is clear and when they are
confused about how to do it. I hope the new footer will help limit
these cases.
Regards,
Andrea
help people unsubscribe the
recruitment list when their intention is clear and when they are
confused about how to do it. I hope the new footer will help limit these
cases.
Regards,
Andrea.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Hello Peter, All,
because everyone (else) seems to agree on volunteer@ please note it's
fine for me. Please do _not_ consider my vote for recruitment@ as a
veto (in case you were in doubt :-).
Now to Peter's reply.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:29:28PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
&
Am 15.01.21 um 21:13 schrieb Carl Marcum:
On 1/13/21 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jan 13, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My
theory is that a lot of people do not understand
On 1/13/21 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 13, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory is
that a lot of people do not understand OpenSource in general
Hi Arrigo
I like the Idea to post Tasks onto Recruitment. I will try this.
However, I try tried to give people tasks that were signing on, and it
never worked out.
Maybe I am a bad recruiter. I leave that to other peoples decision. You
can read my posts on recruitment and what I tried.
I
On 1/13/2021 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 13, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory
>&g
> On Jan 13, 2021, at 1:05 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> I like volunteer@ - it is a call to action. It is the proper verb
+1
On 2021/01/13 18:05:26, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jan 13, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
> >
> > Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> >> I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My
>
On 13/01/2021 18:05, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 13, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>> I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory
>&g
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 13, 2021, at 9:55 AM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>> I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory
>> is that a lot of people do not understand OpenSource in general, and
>&
Am 13.01.21 um 09:25 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My
theory is that a lot of people do not understand OpenSource in general,
and recruitment is commonly strongly linked with Job offers. So have the
theory people write us with the hope
f we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My theory
> is that a lot of people do not understand OpenSource in general, and
> recruitment is commonly strongly linked with Job offers. So have the theory
> people write us with the hope on a job.
>
> Maybe a better name would support
Hello all,
I wonder if we can rename the recruitment list to something else. My
theory is that a lot of people do not understand OpenSource in general,
and recruitment is commonly strongly linked with Job offers. So have the
theory people write us with the hope on a job.
Maybe a better name
On 10.01.21 23:42, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 09/01/2021 Carl Marcum wrote:
It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with
dev@ and some others.
+1 and Infra can indeed add it.
But we should also be
On 09/01/2021 Carl Marcum wrote:
It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with
dev@ and some others.
+1 and Infra can indeed add it.
But we should also be more proactive and remove people when they
Am 09.01.21 um 01:43 schrieb Carl Marcum:
It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with
dev@ and some others.
Sorry this is a proposal without a known solution (on my part) but I
suspect a ticket to
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 07:43:00PM -0500, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
>
> I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with dev@
> and some others.
>
> Sorry this is a
+1
On 09.01.21 01:43, Carl Marcum wrote:
Hi All,
It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with
dev@ and some others.
Sorry this is a proposal without a known solution (on my part) but I
suspect a
Hi All,
It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML.
I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with
dev@ and some others.
Sorry this is a proposal without a known solution (on my part) but I
suspect a ticket to infra may be involved which I
As the focus is switching back to trunk, I expect other people to find
simple issues that they would be able to do themselves but that are
suitable for newcomers too.
In that case we can involve people from the recruitment mailing list:
just create an issue in Bugzilla and send a mail to
Am 10/21/2016 03:44 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@
This might be because of the current documentation workflow:
recruitment@ is
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
> Most new people are joining dev@
This might be because of the current documentation workflow:
recruitment@ is listed in get-involved.mdtext, but this page may l
The traffic on development was a barrier for me.
I did not consider recruitment, because I did not see it in the wiki
joining page.
Maybe if the recruitment section on the wiki is more generic and guides the
interested persons there first, it would be used more.
However because I want to develop I
On 10/21/2016 5:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
like a dismal failure.
With 20/20 hindsight, it does not seem to have been useful. The question
was whether dev@'s
Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
like a dismal failure.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional
The recruitment@ mailing list has been created, accepts messages, and
appears in lists.apache.org.
If you are pushing the "OpenOffice needs developers" message, please add
a suggestion that anyone who wants to help can subscribe to
recruitm...@openoffice.apache.org by sending
ing team with
the people here in the group?
or
2) We do a call for volunteers with nothing more than a new
d...@openoffice.apache.org mailing list, and hash out the details on
that list with the new volunteers.
So if someone has strong views on how things should be done, then they
really need
h the new volunteers.
So if someone has strong views on how things should be done, then they
really need to step up and define #1. Otherwise, a recruitment
activity will lead to a larger group of documentation volunteers who
will have a mind of their own and could take this in other directions.
On 12-12-02, at 05:10 , Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
> I just wanted to say that the situation in which were Keith and Prabha was
> not sustainable in the long term, they merit to be recognized for their
> efforts and not to be frustrated. So, perhaps a group here is a better way
> to sup
+1
librement,
*Sylvain DENIS*
/Expert TIC, FLOSS & WEB
Conseiller en sécurité de l'information
Formateur, conférencier/
Le 02/12/12 11:10, Guy Waterval a écrit :
Hi Louis,
I just wanted to say that the situation in which were Keith and Prabha was
not sustainable in the long term, they merit to
Hi Louis,
I just wanted to say that the situation in which were Keith and Prabha was
not sustainable in the long term, they merit to be recognized for their
efforts and not to be frustrated. So, perhaps a group here is a better way
to support the efforts in the documentation area. There is no att
Hi Guy,
On 12-12-01, at 19:35 , Guy Waterval wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
> 2012/12/1 Louis Suárez-Potts
>
>> Hi
>> On 12-12-01, at 15:52 , Guy Waterval wrote:
>>
>>> A new doc mailing list is absolutely necessary. It could offer an
>>> alternative to the odf authors solution, as this group is the
Hi
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 10:56 PM, RGB ES wrote:
> +1 for a new mailing list and for proposal #1.
+1
--
Albino
2012/12/2 Guy Waterval
> Hi Louis,
>
> 2012/12/1 Louis Suárez-Potts
>
> > Hi
> > On 12-12-01, at 15:52 , Guy Waterval wrote:
> >
> > > A new doc mailing list is absolutely necessary. It could offer an
> > > alternative to the odf authors solution, as this group is the
> > documentation
> > > ar
Hi Louis,
2012/12/1 Louis Suárez-Potts
> Hi
> On 12-12-01, at 15:52 , Guy Waterval wrote:
>
> > A new doc mailing list is absolutely necessary. It could offer an
> > alternative to the odf authors solution, as this group is the
> documentation
> > area of LibreOffice. Even if people are totally
Hi
On 12-12-01, at 15:52 , Guy Waterval wrote:
> A new doc mailing list is absolutely necessary. It could offer an
> alternative to the odf authors solution, as this group is the documentation
> area of LibreOffice. Even if people are totally correct there, we have to
> be realistic, the conditio
ld really get
support and express their qualities. Why not to build a winning team with
the people here in the group?
>
> or
>
> 2) We do a call for volunteers with nothing more than a new
> d...@openoffice.apache.org mailing list, and hash out the details on
> that list with the ne
list, and hash out the details on
that list with the new volunteers.
So if someone has strong views on how things should be done, then they
really need to step up and define #1. Otherwise, a recruitment
activity will lead to a larger group of documentation volunteers who
will have a mind of thei
and process that already is in-progress,
or
2) We do a call for volunteers with nothing more than a new
d...@openoffice.apache.org mailing list, and hash out the details on
that list with the new volunteers.
So if someone has strong views on how things should be done, then they
really need to step up an
65 matches
Mail list logo
