On 14 November 2012 09:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 jan iversen wrote:
>
>> has anyone thought about making events that did not cost
>> 600,- EUR + travel/hotel etc. ??
>>
>
> Yes, free (or with a nominal fee, like 10 EUR) events used to be the norm.
>
>
> maybe it is time, we made
On 10/11/2012 jan iversen wrote:
has anyone thought about making events that did not cost
600,- EUR + travel/hotel etc. ??
Yes, free (or with a nominal fee, like 10 EUR) events used to be the norm.
maybe it is time, we made a
OpenOffice (I do not write AOO on purpose) gathering, where develop
On 09/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On a scale of 1-5, where 1 is lowest and 5 is highest, how effective
was attending ApacheCon EU to you for each of the following:
Here come my answers, and indeed I think this is a useful initiative.
I'll give a bit of context in addition to the 1-5 assessment.
see below please.
jan.
On 10 November 2012 21:31, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM, jan iversen
> wrote:
> > I agree with your thoughts.
> >
> > Except there is a lot of ocean between those events, I intent to visit
> > FOSDEM but being located where I am NA is not a possibili
I'm talking about working as a project within the ASF. Some of the
discussion at the first community event seemed to revolve around
misunderstanding aspects of hownthe ASF works. ApacheCons are an ideal
place to resolve issues. But as a new ASF project AOO might not have had
the benefit.
Sent from
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 2:35 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> I agree with your thoughts.
>
> Except there is a lot of ocean between those events, I intent to visit
> FOSDEM but being located where I am NA is not a possibility.
>
> I might be wrong, but it seems comparing apples with oranges (a danish
> e
On Saturday, November 10, 2012, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I still think you are missing my point. I would like to know if AOO people
> found the event useful in learning about the ASF, hence my original
> observation "You missed how useful was it in learning about the ASF'
Let's ask Andrea et al to
I still think you are missing my point. I would like to know if AOO people
found the event useful in learning about the ASF, hence my original
observation "You missed how useful was it in learning about the ASF"
I'm really not sure what you think I'm saying but your responses are really
confusing
I agree with your thoughts.
Except there is a lot of ocean between those events, I intent to visit
FOSDEM but being located where I am NA is not a possibility.
I might be wrong, but it seems comparing apples with oranges (a danish
expression) when you compare FOSDEM and apacheCON. I thought FOSDE
Come to Apachecon NA in Portland Rob and I'll
buy you a beer for all the good work I've seen
you do!
>
> From: Rob Weir
>To: "dev@openoffice.apache.org"
>Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 2:19 PM
>Subject: Re: ApacheCon E
On Nov 10, 2012, at 11:31 AM, jan iversen wrote:
> Once you get all the answers, will you then publish it (in a "statistic"
> form) ?
Let's see how many responses we get. I see it as prompting a
discussion on priorities and what we get out of various kinds of
events. If numbers help then well
On Nov 10, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Ross Gardler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sure, my point is that what people did do is not necessarily representative
>>> of the value of the event
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
>
>> Sure, my point is that what people did do is not necessarily representative
>> of the value of the event and thus is not necessarily a good indicator of
>> best use of f
Sorry Rob, I for one think you are doing the right thing collecting
experience after a conference !!
Instead of apacheCON just being what it is, you try to collect information
which we can use be be better in the future +1 for that !
Jan.
On 10 November 2012 18:54, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Nov 10
On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Sure, my point is that what people did do is not necessarily representative
> of the value of the event and thus is not necessarily a good indicator of
> best use of funds. Since this was the stated intent of your mail I thought
> it worth point
On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> I'll second what Ross has to say.
>
> There are huge synergies that can happen between Apache projects and often
> these are facilitated by the interactions between people who meet at
> Apachecon. Over time projects become dependencies of other
I'll second what Ross has to say.
There are huge synergies that can happen between Apache projects and often
these are facilitated by the interactions between people who meet at Apachecon.
Over time projects become dependencies of other projects in very powerful ways.
One example is Apache Tika
Sure, my point is that what people did do is not necessarily representative
of the value of the event and thus is not necessarily a good indicator of
best use of funds. Since this was the stated intent of your mail I thought
it worth pointing out that it might be a useful exercise.
My motivation i
Once you get all the answers, will you then publish it (in a "statistic"
form) ?
I looked deeply into my pocket for apacheCon, but found it very expensive,
so I would really like to hear if it was worthwhile.
We have FOSDEM upcomming in europe, and many like me, may be questioning,
is that how I
Ross, this isn't a "what if" survey based on what attendees might have
done, but didn't. I'm interesting in their actual experiences. But
feel free to add a relevant additional question if you feel one is
missing.
-Rob
On Nov 10, 2012, at 10:04 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> You missed how useful wa
You missed how useful was it in learning about the ASF
The problem is that the answers depend on how one approached the event. If
an individual only attended the AOO track then one would not benefit from
the community track or other project specific tracks for example.
Ross
Sent from mobile, for
21 matches
Mail list logo
