Hi Damjan,
Am 29.03.24 um 11:17 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:46 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
Hi Dave,
Am 17.03.24 um 18:01 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi Damjan,
I know it “opens a big can of worms” and is another issue, but upgrading
to a newer OpenSSL for Trunk and maybe 4.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 5:46 PM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Am 17.03.24 um 18:01 schrieb Dave Fisher:
> > Hi Damjan,
> >
> > I know it “opens a big can of worms” and is another issue, but upgrading
> to a newer OpenSSL for Trunk and maybe 4.2 would be a very good thing,
>
> We need to u
x/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the
build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Matthias
Am 17.03.24 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Please check further up in the log, or run "build" in main/oox
again.
That &quo
oox
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the
build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Hello Damjan, all,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 06:10:01AM +, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> That's great. Thank you for testing.
>
> My own tests also show it no longer crashes, both the Standard and Agile
> encryption are working now :).
Great job!
--
Arrigo
-
ke: Error code 2, while making 'all'
1 module(s):
oox
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the
build
by running:
b
> >>>>>> error
> >>>>>> C2039: 'data' : is not a member of 'std::vector<_Ty>'
> >>>>>>with
> >>>>>>[
> >>>>>>_Ty=sal_uInt8
> >>>>
fice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the
build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Matthias
Am 17.03.24 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Please check further up in the log, or run "build" in main/oox
again.
That
Hi Dave,
Am 17.03.24 um 18:01 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi Damjan,
I know it “opens a big can of worms” and is another issue, but upgrading to a
newer OpenSSL for Trunk and maybe 4.2 would be a very good thing,
We need to update a lot of things, including openSSL and MSVC...
But we should first
Hi Damjan,
I know it “opens a big can of worms” and is another issue, but upgrading to a
newer OpenSSL for Trunk and maybe 4.2 would be a very good thing,
Best,
Dave
> On Mar 17, 2024, at 4:23 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> Also
> that ancient OpenSSL version we use internally, 1.0.x, uses
>
ebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Matthias
Am 17.03.24 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Please check f
gt;> _Ty=sal_uInt8
> >>> ]
> >>> c:/Source/openoffice/main/oox/source/core/encryption.cxx(888) : error
> >>> C2039: 'data' : is not a member of 'std::vector<_Ty>'
> >>> with
> >&g
uInt8
> >>> ]
> >>> c:/Source/openoffice/main/oox/source/core/encryption.cxx(888) : error
> >>> C2039: 'data' : is not a member of 'std::vector<_Ty>'
> >>> with
> >>> [
> >>>
27;all'
1 module(s):
oox
need(s) to be rebuilt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Matthia
ource/openoffice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Matthias
Am 17.03.24 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Please check further up in the log, or run "build" in main/oox aga
/openoffice/main/solver/450/
> wntmsci12.pro/workdir/CxxObject/oox/source/core/encryption.o',
> needed by
> '/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/solver/450/
> wntmsci12.pro/workdir/LinkTarget/Library/ioox.lib'.
> Stop.
> dmake: Error code 2, while making 'all'
>
lt
Reason(s):
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/cygdrive/c/Source/openoffice/main/oox/prj
When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build
by running:
build --from oox
---
Regards,
Matthias
Am 17.03.24 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Please
the errors in that module you can resume the build
> by running:
>
> build --from oox
>
> Am 16.03.24 um 04:49 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> > Hi
> >
> > Bug 118236 with 7 votes, the inability to open password-protected
> > (encrypted) OOXML files from M
e you can resume the build
by running:
build --from oox
Am 16.03.24 um 04:49 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
Hi
Bug 118236 with 7 votes, the inability to open password-protected
(encrypted) OOXML files from MS Office 2010+, is now fixed in trunk :-)
---snip---
commit 506fa58b1970084a0caacb50b
:
Hi
Bug 118236 with 7 votes, the inability to open password-protected
(encrypted) OOXML files from MS Office 2010+, is now fixed in trunk :-)
---snip---
commit 506fa58b1970084a0caacb50b3a805e469be4756 (HEAD -> trunk,
origin/trunk, origin/HEAD)
Author: Damjan Jovanovic
Date: Sat Mar 2 18:47
(encrypted) OOXML files from MS Office 2010+, is now fixed in trunk :-)
---snip---
commit 506fa58b1970084a0caacb50b3a805e469be4756 (HEAD -> trunk,
origin/trunk, origin/HEAD)
Author: Damjan Jovanovic
Date: Sat Mar 2 18:47:05 2024 +0200
Implement the (MS Office 2010+) OOXML "Agile en
Hi
Bug 118236 with 7 votes, the inability to open password-protected
(encrypted) OOXML files from MS Office 2010+, is now fixed in trunk :-)
---snip---
commit 506fa58b1970084a0caacb50b3a805e469be4756 (HEAD -> trunk,
origin/trunk, origin/HEAD)
Author: Damjan Jovanovic
Date: Sat Mar 2 18:47
> On Oct 17, 2020, at 1:00 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I've put together my previous work on an OOXML export filter for
> spreadsheets, and pushed it into a branch called poi-filter.
>
> So far it builds successfully, gets packaged, appears in the &q
Hi Damjan,
On 10/17/20 4:00 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
Hi
I've put together my previous work on an OOXML export filter for
spreadsheets, and pushed it into a branch called poi-filter.
So far it builds successfully, gets packaged, appears in the "Save" dialog,
loads, has all th
Hi
I've put together my previous work on an OOXML export filter for
spreadsheets, and pushed it into a branch called poi-filter.
So far it builds successfully, gets packaged, appears in the "Save" dialog,
loads, has all the right methods called, and gets to traversing and savi
The ISO Standards for OOXML are free to the public. There is a list of all
such free standards, but you have to scan it for the OOXML ones (by their
ISO/IEC 29500 numbers) near the end of the list at
<http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html>.
The easiest way
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> I believe a decision like the one in Berlin is always political
> motivated. See for example the upcoming discussion about the
> same topic
> in Munich after changes in the administration.
You're absolutely right, but what can we do about
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 22:23
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
On 10/24/2014 08:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> be
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 22:26
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
Do you know off hand if this is through OLE or some other
:
To be clear, I can put a complete Word Document (as a binary blob) inside of an
ODF Text document too. I just don't know if that particular avenue is what was
taken as a smoking gun about OOXML or not. I can put a complete ODF Text
document (as a binary blob) inside of an OOXML .docx too.
On 10/24/2014 08:50 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML
To be clear, I can put a complete Word Document (as a binary blob) inside of an
ODF Text document too. I just don't know if that particular avenue is what was
taken as a smoking gun about OOXML or not. I can put a complete ODF Text
document (as a binary blob) inside of an OOXML .doc
below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 17:27
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Spam (9.566):Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML
support?)
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton
On 10/24/2014 11:42 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
On
below.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak [mailto:and...@pitonyak.org]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2014 06:18
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice lost again 6000 users (was: Improved OOXML support?)
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> But wh
On 10/24/2014 01:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
But where is the problem? Either OOXML *is* ISO standard or is not
ISO-standard. If the problem is however that MS is 'meddling' in the
standard, then it is a political issue that requires policy responses
- not a question of software d
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
>
>> Being a customer, I do see things differently.
>> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
>
> theoretically correct, but practically?
>
&
don't want to fall behind ... whatever bleeding edge
[contradiction in itself].
Oh, of course they need MS Office for security reasons ... WTF?
A full featured OOXML suite exists. It costs some money and it should
always be used when OOXML is required. Your business opportunities are
the same as
>but there is no company within:
>http://www.openoffice.org/bizdev/consultants.html
>that wants to do the work.
Maybe see with IBM:
http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/ibm-support-for-apache-openoffice/
-
To unsubscribe,
On 24.10.2014 11:14, Michal Hriň wrote:
>
>
> Dňa 24.10.2014 o 09:59 Jürgen Schmidt napísal(a):
>> On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
>>>
>>>> Being a cust
Dňa 24.10.2014 o 09:59 Jürgen Schmidt napísal(a):
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
Being a customer, I do see things differently.
Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
One day in
On 24/10/14 07:54, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
>
>> Being a customer, I do see things differently.
>> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
>
> theoretically correct, but practically?
>
>&g
> From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com]
> no it means the benefit of the patches is so minimal that a rewrite is
> probably cheaper and easier. For the example for 1 use case we have
> integrated we spend a lot of time to understand the patch and realize
> that the implementation ad
Hello,
> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
> Being a customer, I do see things differently.
> Every OOXML file is a vote against ODF.
theoretically correct, but practically?
> One day in future LO will save ODF as a secondary
> option.
Possible.
But where
On 23/10/14 07:02, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>
>> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:13 PM
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Improved OOXML support?
>>
>> With regard to the quotation f
Am 23.10.2014 um 06:47 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>
> I think it's good that we live in a free society and customers have the right
> to
> see things differently.
>
Being a customer, I do see things differently. Every OOXML file is a
vote against ODF. One day in future L
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 11:13 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Improved OOXML support?
>
> With regard to the quotation from me, yes, it is possible to
> find funding for improveme
> From: Andreas Säger [mailto:saege...@t-online.de]
> > I find it really strange that it seems impossible to find
> companies that are
> > willing to integrate corresponding filter in AOO, as a
> normal commercial support.
> >
>
> If I were in need of an
Am 22.10.2014 um 07:03 schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
>
> I find it really strange that it seems impossible to find companies that are
> willing to integrate corresponding filter in AOO, as a normal commercial
> support.
>
If I were in need of an OOXML suite, I would pay for the real
improved OOXML support was funded by an organization. You've seen Jürgen
Schmidt's response on the difficulty there has been integrating that code into
Apache OpenOffice. I don't doubt his appraisal.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-sc
n figure out a series of files,
> but there will always be something that is not completely
> compatible.
This is absolutely not a problem, the compatibility already provides the
LibreOffice would be enough (for now).
> I suspect that a bigger detriment to someone building
> commerc
inline
-Original Message-
From: BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 08:12
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Improved OOXML support?
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:03 AM, Jörg Schmidt
wrote:
> From: BRM [mailto:bm_w
On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 1:03 AM, Jörg Schmidt
wrote:
> From: BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
> > Unfortunately that will always be the state of OOXML
> > integration for anyone other than Microsoft since OOXML is a
> > poorly defined standard that
> From: BRM [mailto:bm_witn...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
> Unfortunately that will always be the state of OOXML
> integration for anyone other than Microsoft since OOXML is a
> poorly defined standard that relies on many binary extensions
> that are not published. Kind of like the
er time on
this.
This is bad news for AOO, because it will lose more users.
I myself had tried in recent weeks to paid support for OOXML filter but
unfortunately could not find one.
Unfortunately that will always be the state of OOXML integration for anyone
other than Microsoft since OOXML i
t; this.
> This is bad news for AOO, because it will lose more users.
> I myself had tried in recent weeks to paid support for OOXML filter but
> unfortunately could not find one.
>
Unfortunately that will always be the state of OOXML integration for anyone
other than Microsoft since OO
rged in LO).
> The patches were incomplete and the implementation not
> complete at all.
> We decided for us (some developer) that we don't spend further time on
> this.
This is bad news for AOO, because it will lose more users.
I myself had tried in recent weeks to paid support
On 21/10/14 08:34, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know when the integration of the extended OOXML filter
> functionality will be completed in AOO?
>
> I mean the enhancements that have been created within a project of the OSBA:
> http://www.osb-alliance.de
Hello,
Does anyone know when the integration of the extended OOXML filter
functionality will be completed in AOO?
I mean the enhancements that have been created within a project of the OSBA:
http://www.osb-alliance.de/en/working-groups/wg-office-interoperability/project-1-by-osb-alliance
On 16/08/2014 Peter Kelly wrote:
On 16 Aug 2014, at 12:55 pm, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I've also been fixing (or breaking, who knows!) some documentation on
my clone (my "fork" as Github likes to call it) but I'll submit a pull
request only when basic things work.
I've just merged in your changes
backup information for the
DChanges 2014 workshop next month.
- Dennis
PS: Roundtripping between OOXML and HTML is something that Microsoft put
considerable effort into. Some found the resulting HTML (pre-HTML5) rather
nauseous, but it is remarkably presentation-preserving as far as it goes.
-- Dennis E. Hamilton
>dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430
>https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A
>X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sa
l Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 01:10
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: DocFormats - Open source OOXML implementation
>
> On 16 August 2014 03:50, Peter Kelly wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
> > Now, onto the fix:
> >
> >
. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org+1-206-779-9430
https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A
X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 01:10
To: dev
Subject: Re: Doc
On 16 Aug 2014, at 12:55 pm, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've also been fixing (or breaking, who knows!) some documentation on my
> clone (my "fork" as Github likes to call it) but I'll submit a pull request
> only when basic things work.
I've just merged in your changes and also invited you as a
On 16 August 2014 03:50, Peter Kelly wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2014, at 5:26 am, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> On 15/08/2014 Peter Kelly wrote:
>
> Those of you interested in OOXML may want to have a look at my own
> implementation of (a subset of) the spec, which is part of a librar
ather badly (invalid OOXML output in
the second conversion, ZIP container clearly missing files and
possible breaking order) in a simple test I did with a 1-page docx file.
I'm not surprised this is the first issue to come up :$ There's a *lot*
of knowledge I need to document for others; que
On 16 Aug 2014, at 5:26 am, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Does this mean that
> $ dfutil/dfutil filename.docx filename.html
> $ dfutil/dfutil filename.html filename2.docx
> should produce a "filename2.docx" that is quite similar to "filename.docx"?
> It is failing
On 16 Aug 2014, at 5:26 am, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 15/08/2014 Peter Kelly wrote:
>> Those of you interested in OOXML may want to have a look at my own
>> implementation of (a subset of) the spec, which is part of a library
>> I've just made available as ope
On 15/08/2014 Peter Kelly wrote:
Those of you interested in OOXML may want to have a look at my own
implementation of (a subset of) the spec, which is part of a library
I've just made available as open source (license is ASLv2):
https://github.com/uxproductivity/DocFormats
It&#
Those of you interested in OOXML may want to have a look at my own
implementation of (a subset of) the spec, which is part of a library I've just
made available as open source (license is ASLv2):
https://github.com/uxproductivity/DocFormats
I started working on this around two years a
Recently I looked into issues where Chinese numbering in doc / docx /rtf
were missed when opening the file in OpenOffice. Fortunately, I found the
way to fix them. ( as attached )
I tried to key in an issue and submit my patch. (
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125400) I don't kn
Hi.
Thanks to a (once again) good tip from andre, I found out why I could not
see the OOXML sources and control the code.
Be carefull when you upgrade svn client to newest, I had to do a fallback
before "svn up" would work correctly.
rgds
jan I.
On 4 August 2014 21:49, ja
On 24/07/2014 Peter Kelly wrote:
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OOXML
The new content is that linked to from the first section, currently
limited to a description of the packaging format, extensibility
features, and a brief introduction to WordProcessingML. This is just the
beginning, and
On 4 August 2014 18:23, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> Jan asks good questions below.
>
> I have a comment with regard to (3) "Will the OOXML implementation allow
> round-trip of our documents without loss of information?"
>
> It strikes me that there are OOXML im
Jan asks good questions below.
I have a comment with regard to (3) "Will the OOXML implementation allow
round-trip of our documents without loss of information?"
It strikes me that there are OOXML import and export capabilities already in
Apache OpenOffice and a better question may
introduced in the ODF specification
but which are not modelled in the Relax NG Schema (beyond saying they have
string values, for example).
This sort of thing also happens rather heavily in OOXML, where communication
among parts uses a unique cross-part relationship model. There are also many
w will the "implementation defined" items, be documented, they are
likely to change over time, to its problaly a poing where maintenance is
needed, and thus a higher demand on documentation ?
3) Will the OOXML implementation allow round-trip of our documents without
loss of information ?
Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
On 08/03/2014 12:50 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
features that are supported in OOXML but not ODF, e.g. table
styles.
If AOO does not support Table Styles and a particular file format does
not, the biggest problem is that you lose table styles when you load,
edit
On 4 Aug 2014, at 12:16 am, jan i wrote:
> By painfull experience, I found out that our internal (memory) structure is
> a superset of mixed ODF and pre-odf items. I dont think you can have a pure
> odf/OOXML memory structure, you need internal pointers as well (like
> start/fi
On 08/03/2014 12:50 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
On 3 Aug 2014, at 6:52 pm, Regina Henschel <mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de>> wrote:
The second option has the advantage that it would be easier to cater
for features that are supported in OOXML but not ODF, e.g. table
styles. However
. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 13:05
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: OOXML
[ ... ]
There are some tricky cases, including
- Changes that overlap/conflict with tracked changes but tracked changes are
not updated/preserved properly
- Accessibili
sed and requested for signed e-mail
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, August 3, 2014 00:57
> To: dev; Dennis Hamilton
> Subject: Re: OOXML
>
> On 2 August 2014 22:31, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
> > [ ... ]
org]
Sent: Sunday, August 3, 2014 00:57
To: dev; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: OOXML
On 2 August 2014 22:31, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> [ ... ] There is no strict minimum Conforming OpenDocument
> Consumer. A consumer must not object to anything in the document file that
> conforms to the O
at the document.
>
>
> Interesting.
>
> Given this is the case, what would you suggest would be the best strategy
> for supporting OOXML?
>
> 1) Two-way conversion between OOXML and ODF, with OpenOffice then dealing
> solely with the file as ODF (not even being aware
representation of the document? Or are the runtime data structures used
>> different to the XML trees that one finds in an ODF package?
>
> No, OpenOffice has a very different in-memory representation than the ODF
> format. And the API is a third version of looking at the document.
On 3 Aug 2014, at 3:05 am, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> In line with the sketch that Peter Kelley provides below, I am personally
> very sympathetic to the idea of having an internal model that can tolerate
> difference in format between input and output while preserving in the output
> everyth
Hi Peter,
Peter Kelly schrieb:
On 3 Aug 2014, at 1:57 am, jan i mailto:j...@apache.org>> wrote:
I too am on peter fast rolling waggon :-) but I am also confused.
@peter maybe you could explain a couple of things, for non-document
specialists:
1) Following your thought, with biderectional edi
On 3 Aug 2014, at 3:05 am, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> In line with the sketch that Peter Kelley provides below, I am personally
> very sympathetic to the idea of having an internal model that can tolerate
> difference in format between input and output while preserving in the output
> everyth
destroy
something ;)
Having said that though, there are a couple of provisions for this. One is
simply the ability to include extra files in the package, labeled with a
particular namespace. Each OOXML package contains a "relationship graph", which
is a separate data structure from th
id PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A
> X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 11:58
> To: dev; Dennis Hamilton
> Subject: Re: OOXML
>
> On 2 August 201
on't like it
> when I have to use Word.
>
>
> On 08/02/2014 10:24 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
>> The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
>> discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
>>
>> I still
orado wrote:
The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care
as long as they can send in office native formats.
I never heard someone s
--
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 11:58
To: dev; Dennis Hamilton
Subject: Re: OOXML
On 2 August 2014 20:27, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> s below.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, Augu
X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail
From: Peter Kelly [mailto:kelly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 09:43
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: OOXML
On 2 Aug 2014, at 9:24 pm, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to pr
On 2 August 2014 20:27, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> s below.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 08:57
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: OOXML
>
> On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
s below.
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, August 2, 2014 08:57
To: dev
Subject: Re: OOXML
On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> > On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> > The Support that i
On 2 Aug 2014, at 9:24 pm, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
> discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
>
> I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care
> as l
On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
> > On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> >
> > The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
> > discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
>
> On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>
> The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the
> discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls.
>
> I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
