On 2 August 2014 17:06, Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 2014-08-02, at 10:24, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> wrote: > > > > The Support that is done is to receieve OOXML not to produce them, the > > discussion issue would be to support legacy formats like .doc or .xls. > > > > I still dont see a point to generate OOXML and most people dont care > > as long as they can send in office native formats. > > > > I never heard someone saying, please send it on docx, your doc is a > > closed binary format. > > Actually, I have. But it also matters on mobile, as well as, I'd guess, > for some developing processes for batch conversion of documents. Finally, > it's not evident to me that refusing to develop to what is likely to become > the major desktop document format globally—alas—is a good strategy that > would lead to the adoption of OO. Rather, it seems it would only help those > applications that do (express) both ODF *and* .docx well. > Please dont forget, the computer business have always had 2 types of standard the official one and the de facto one. For those to young to remember, tcp/ip is not an official standard (OSI was) but something a number of companies decided to promote, I see docx in the same light. rgds jan I > > louis > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
