Re: help needed building AOO for the first time

Are you following one of these guides : https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10 https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Buildi

Re: help needed building AOO for the first time

Hi, You're welcome! Am 26.09.20 um 17:17 schrieb Shachar Arieli: > Hi, > > I am trying to build AOO on windows 10 for the first time. > I installed all the prerequisites as far as i understood. I think we need more details... What prerequisites have you installed? Which branch of AOO do you wan

help needed building AOO for the first time

Hi, I am trying to build AOO on windows 10 for the first time. I installed all the prerequisites as far as i understood. When i attempt to create the build i get an error " configure: error: cannot run /bin/sh ./config.sub " See the output of the console below: shach@DESKTOP-1FFQPA8 /cygdrive/c/a

Re: Help Needed

On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:51:32 -0700 Donnell Giambastiani wrote: > Hi; > I have used your open office program for quite a few years with > no problems. Last week I am not sure what happened but all of my saved > documents have just disappeared. I really need your help to get them > back as I use t

Help Needed

Hi; I have used your open office program for quite a few years with no problems. Last week I am not sure what happened but all of my saved documents have just disappeared. I really need your help to get them back as I use them for my work and photos. Can someone please get back to me as soon as

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Marcus wrote: > Am 09/06/2016 04:32 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: >> Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Marcus wrote: I've got a AOO 4.2.0m1 Build 9800 Rev. 1759138. >>> >>> Congratulations! >>> Thank very much for your help. Of course, as a good contributor I'll collect all data and update

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Am 09/06/2016 04:32 PM, schrieb Keith N. McKenna: Andrea Pescetti wrote: Marcus wrote: I've got a AOO 4.2.0m1 Build 9800 Rev. 1759138. Congratulations! Thank very much for your help. Of course, as a good contributor I'll collect all data and update [1] with a new Fedora 21 section. [1] http

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Marcus wrote: >> I've got a AOO 4.2.0m1 Build 9800 Rev. 1759138. > > Congratulations! > >> Thank very much for your help. Of course, as a good contributor I'll >> collect all data and update [1] with a new Fedora 21 section. >> [1] >> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Docu

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Marcus wrote: I've got a AOO 4.2.0m1 Build 9800 Rev. 1759138. Congratulations! Thank very much for your help. Of course, as a good contributor I'll collect all data and update [1] with a new Fedora 21 section. [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Am 09/06/2016 12:25 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 6 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 11:00 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 05:3

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

On 6 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/05/2016 11:00 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 09/05/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Am 09/05/2016 11:00 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 4 Sep, Marc

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/05/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: >>>

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Am 09/05/2016 10:39 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. But

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: > On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: >> Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. >> >> But now it's br

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Am 09/05/2016 09:33 PM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. But now it's breaking in svx: [...] = Building module svx ==

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

On 5 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: >> On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. But now it's breaking in svx: [...] = Building module svx

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Am 09/05/2016 05:39 AM, schrieb Don Lewis: On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. But now it's breaking in svx: [...] = Building module svx = Entering /share/linux2/aoo/trunk/main/svx/prj cd ..&& m

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

On 4 Sep, Don Lewis wrote: > On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: >> Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. >> >> But now it's breaking in svx: >> >> [...] >> >> = >> Building module svx >> = >> >> Entering /share/linux2/aoo/trunk/main/svx/prj >> >> cd .. && make -s

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

On 4 Sep, Marcus wrote: > Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. > > But now it's breaking in svx: > > [...] > > = > Building module svx > = > > Entering /share/linux2/aoo/trunk/main/svx/prj > > cd .. && make -s -r -j1 && make -s -r deliverlog > [ buil

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

Thanks a lot. "libXt-devel" was indeed not installed. But now it's breaking in svx: [...] = Building module svx = Entering /share/linux2/aoo/trunk/main/svx/prj cd .. && make -s -r -j1 && make -s -r deliverlog [ build LNK ] Library/libsvxcore.so /share/linux2/aoo/trun

Re: Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

X11/StringDefs.h is provided by the libxt-dev package on Ubuntu. Regards Damjan On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Marcus wrote: > I've managed to start my first build of trunk. After some hours of reading > building guides and installing/configuring prerequisites, it starts now but > quits with a

Help needed: Build error in bean and vcl

I've managed to start my first build of trunk. After some hours of reading building guides and installing/configuring prerequisites, it starts now but quits with an error. Hardware / software: - Intel Core i7-4710HQ 2.5 GHz (4 cores) - 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD - Fedora 21 Configure options: $ ./c

RE: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

+1 to the suggestions from Marcus > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 09:18 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues > > Am 04/05/2016 01:51 AM, schr

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/05/2016 01:51 AM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 4/4/2016 2:59 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 04/04/2016 11:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: ... In any case, since we don't currently have "official" distros for Solaris -- I would be content changing all these issues to ENHANCEMENT rather than DEFECT. Th

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

On 4/4/2016 2:59 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 04/04/2016 11:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: ... In any case, since we don't currently have "official" distros for Solaris -- I would be content changing all these issues to ENHANCEMENT rather than DEFECT. Thoughts? I think this wouldn't change the actual pr

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/04/2016 11:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 04/04/2016 08:00 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, schrieb Απόστολος Συρόπουλος: yes, that's nice. But you shouldn't commit fixes without a possibility to test if it was good. Would you? ;-) First I did this in the past. Please see ht

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

On 04/04/2016 08:00 AM, Marcus wrote: > Am 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, schrieb Απόστολος Συρόπουλος: >>> >>> yes, that's nice. But you shouldn't commit fixes without >>> a possibility >>> to test if it was good. Would you? ;-) >>> >> >> First I did this in the past. Please see >> >> https://asyropoulos.w

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/04/2016 01:07 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 4/4/2016 2:28 AM, Marcus wrote: ... It's simply a fact that we have no experts for Solaris and no testing hardware. ... Solaris runs on Intel PC hardware, so no need for special testing hardware. From the late 1980's to 2002, I was a syst

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, schrieb Απόστολος Συρόπουλος: yes, that's nice. But you shouldn't commit fixes without a possibility to test if it was good. Would you? ;-) First I did this in the past. Please see https://asyropoulos.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/compiling-openoffice4/ interesting. Than

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Hi Marcus, * :) On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 00:41 +0200, Marcus wrote: [...] > @Nicolas: > AFAIK your company (Adfinis SyGroup AG) is managing the ports for  > Solaris Sparc and x86. Is it possbile to get help from you for this case? Thanks for keeping me in the loop! Unfortunately we do not have enou

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

On 4/4/2016 2:28 AM, Marcus wrote: ... It's simply a fact that we have no experts for Solaris and no testing hardware. ... Solaris runs on Intel PC hardware, so no need for special testing hardware. From the late 1980's to 2002, I was a system performance analyst and architect for servers that

RE: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

> > yes, that's nice. But you shouldn't commit fixes without a possibility > to test if it was good. Would you? ;-) > First I did this in the past. Please see https://asyropoulos.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/compiling-openoffice4/ At that time I was sure the patches would find their way to source

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/04/2016 11:14 AM, schrieb Απόστολος Συρόπουλος: one problem of integrating patches is that you need to test them if the trunk builds are still OK or if some adjustments are necessary. However, AFAIK no developer has a Solaris machine under the desk and therefore it's not a good idea to com

RE: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

> > one problem of integrating patches is that you need to test them if the > trunk builds are still OK or if some adjustments are necessary. However, > AFAIK no developer has a Solaris machine under the desk and therefore > it's not a good idea to commit fixes when you don't know what the > r

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 04/03/2016 06:56 PM, schrieb Απόστολος Συρόπουλος: We have a number of old Solaris related build issues that could use some testing. https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125361 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125362 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125364 https://bz.ap

RE: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

> > We have a number of old Solaris related build issues that > > could use some testing. > > > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125361 > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125362 > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125364 > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: [HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

Am 03/31/2016 12:02 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: We have a number of old Solaris related build issues that could use some testing. https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125361 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125362 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125364 https://bz.apache.org/o

[HELP NEEDED] old Solaris related build issues

We have a number of old Solaris related build issues that could use some testing. https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125361 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125362 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125364 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125365 The fixes pertain t

Help needed from Windows builders on buildbot problems

I am not a Windows builder. I am looking at the overview logs from the nightly Windows buildbot from here: https://ci.apache.org/builders/aoo-win7 I know we have a problem with apr and possibly elsewhere but if you click the links on builds #70 and #71 in the configure steps, right now I am concer

Re: [INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/02/2015 10:16 AM, Gavin Mcdonald wrote: > Thanks Kay, for script changes, allow an hour to show on the Web as > most run on an hour cron > > HTH > > Gav... OK, changes are out there. Thanks for your guidance. > > > On 2 Sep 2015 17:30, Kay

Re: [INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

Thanks Kay, for script changes, allow an hour to show on the Web as most run on an hour cron HTH Gav... On 2 Sep 2015 17:30, Kay Schenk wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 09/02/2015 04:06 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > >> On 2 Sep 2015, at 1:27 am, Kay

Re: [INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/02/2015 04:06 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > >> On 2 Sep 2015, at 1:27 am, Kay Schenk > > wrote: >> >> Can someone provide instructions on how to make changes on our >> buildbot output page-- >> >> https://ci.apach

Re: [INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

> On 2 Sep 2015, at 1:27 am, Kay Schenk wrote: > > Can someone provide instructions on how to make changes on our buildbot > output page-- > > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ > > Right now, the Win nightly link is going to: > https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/l

[INFRA] help needed with link change on our buildbot output page

Can someone provide instructions on how to make changes on our buildbot output page-- https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ Right now, the Win nightly link is going to: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/win/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html When it needs to go to: https://ci.apa

Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

sting can be done from buildbot builds which run later tonight. Additional findings/comments should be made on the issue. > > -Original Message- From: Rory O'Farrell > [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 23:37 To: > dev@openoffice.apache.org Subje

RE: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

[mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2015 09:20 To: OOo Apache Subject: Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 15:23:22 -0700 > "Dennis E. Hamilton&qu

Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

round later today > to see if I can come up with anything, but I'm going offline shortly to do > Saturday things. > > Rory > > > > > -Original Message- > > >From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] > > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 14:20

RE: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

Office reflect this change in distributed updates. - Dennis -Original Message- From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 23:37 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs On F

Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

I find that Arabic and Hebrew generally indent first line of a paragraph, but did not find any "standard" usage; the few examples I saw seem to use a one em amount (i.e. that used by the existing (Automatic" setting in OpenOffice). I have found this on Chinese indents https://bz.apache.org/ooo/

Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

nything, but I'm going offline shortly to do Saturday things. Rory > > -Original Message- > >From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 14:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: help needed on ODF standard

RE: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

enk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 13:58 To: AOO Dev Apache Subject: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs This is in regard to issue https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126476 I can't easily locate what the ODF 1.2 standard is on

Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

e] > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 14:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:57:59 -0700 > Kay Schenk wrote: > > > This is in regard to issue > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/sho

RE: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

lieve "automatic" is on by default, so someone must be defining styles this way, you think? -Original Message- From: Rory O'Farrell [mailto:ofarr...@iol.ie] Sent: Friday, August 21, 2015 14:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: help needed on ODF standard for "au

Re: help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:57:59 -0700 Kay Schenk wrote: > This is in regard to issue > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126476 > > I can't easily locate what the ODF 1.2 standard is on calculation for a > first line auto indent for a paragraph. Well I found this -- > http://officeopenxml.c

help needed on ODF standard for "auto" indent for paragraphs

This is in regard to issue https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126476 I can't easily locate what the ODF 1.2 standard is on calculation for a first line auto indent for a paragraph. Well I found this -- http://officeopenxml.com/WPindentation.php but it doesn't make a lot of sense to me. :/

Re: Help needed with config, PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro

[top posting] Well no responses but no need for a response. No, I did not get this solved -- yet! Autoconf on my new setup is, as we say here in the US, "weirding" things out quite a bit, and, an autotools guru I am not, so LOTS of research. :( later... On 06/22/2015 03:56 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:

Help needed with config, PKG_CHECK_MODULES macro

I am up on a new CentOS 6 OS (32 bit). Mostly OK except I can NOT get PKG_CHECK_MODULES used in configure.in to work. It fails on the first occurrence looking for cppunit. It's been so long since I first started building AOO that I don't remember if I had to do something special to my autoconf setu

Re: [mail list moderation] Help needed with message to "announce"

On 01/02/2015 03:05 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent yesterday >> about ApacheConNA, but it hasn't been delivered to that list. Does it need >> help from a list moderator? >> > > > Sorry

Re: [mail list moderation] Help needed with message to "announce"

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent yesterday > about ApacheConNA, but it hasn't been delivered to that list. Does it need > help from a list moderator? > Sorry for the delay. I've been distracted by various family

Re: [mail list moderation] Help needed with message to "announce"

On 30 December 2014 at 23:39, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 1:59 PM, jan i wrote: > > > On 30 December 2014 at 21:38, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent > > yesterday > > > about ApacheConNA, but it hasn't been delivered to

Re: [mail list moderation] Help needed with message to "announce"

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 1:59 PM, jan i wrote: > On 30 December 2014 at 21:38, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent > yesterday > > about ApacheConNA, but it hasn't been delivered to that list. Does it > need > > help from a list moderator? > > >

Re: [mail list moderation] Help needed with message to "announce"

On 30 December 2014 at 21:38, Kay Schenk wrote: > I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent yesterday > about ApacheConNA, but it hasn't been delivered to that list. Does it need > help from a list moderator? > Should it not have been sent to annou...@apache.org ? (at least

[mail list moderation] Help needed with message to "announce"

I included annou...@openoffice.apache.org on the message I sent yesterday about ApacheConNA, but it hasn't been delivered to that list. Does it need help from a list moderator? -- - MzK "There's a bit

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

Hi, On 03.07.2014 00:20, Kay Schenk wrote: On 07/01/2014 01:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query for issues which had been submitted

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

On 02/07/2014 Kay Schenk wrote: short FYI -- there should now be a search with the name OpenSubmittedSince410 accessible to registered users with your criteria for others to work on as well. You can also use http://s.apache.org/openoffice411review which is accessible by anyone and corresponds

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

On 07/01/2014 01:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned > 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. > > My issue query for issues which had been submitted since our 4.1.0 > release and whic

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

On 07/02/2014 08:40 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 07/02/2014 12:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < >>> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, in order to assure

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

Am 07/02/2014 09:44 AM, schrieb Mathias Röllig: In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Now I have enough time but can't help. :-( Breakdown with bicycle, both elbows are broken. oh, thats really sa

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

On 07/02/2014 12:08 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < >> orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned >>> 4.1

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

Hi, On 02.07.2014 09:44, Mathias Röllig wrote: In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Now I have enough time but can't help. :-( Breakdown with bicycle, both elbows are broken. Very sad to hear f

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Now I have enough time but can't help. :-( Breakdown with bicycle, both elbows are broken. Regards, Mathias ---

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

Hi, On 01.07.2014 23:26, Kay Schenk wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann < orwittm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned > 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. > > My issue query for issues which had been submitted

Re: [REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

Hi Oliver! In order to support the developers it would be really great, if these issues could be reviewed: I hope, I find enough time to help. Regards, Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

[REQUEST] help needed on newly submitted issues

Hi, in order to assure that we address the serious defects in our planned 4.1.1 release I would like to request help on newly submitted issues. My issue query for issues which had been submitted since our 4.1.0 release and which are not solved contain more than 200 issues. Most of them are i

Re: [help needed] trunk, changed configure.in

On 11/20/13 12:56 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:03 PM, jan i wrote: > >> Problem solved. >> >> variable WITH_STLPORT was set to "NO" but the test was != "no". >> >> R1543551 correct that, but I can only test on ubuntu 12.04, I cannot >> upgrade capstone and l10n40 at the mome

Re: [help needed] trunk, changed configure.in

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:03 PM, jan i wrote: > Problem solved. > > variable WITH_STLPORT was set to "NO" but the test was != "no". > > R1543551 correct that, but I can only test on ubuntu 12.04, I cannot > upgrade capstone and l10n40 at the moment. > > rgds > jan I. > I got caught by this inte

Re: [help needed] trunk, changed configure.in

Problem solved. variable WITH_STLPORT was set to "NO" but the test was != "no". R1543551 correct that, but I can only test on ubuntu 12.04, I cannot upgrade capstone and l10n40 at the moment. rgds jan I. On 19 November 2013 20:17, jan i wrote: > hi. > > I just did "svn up", ran autoconf, an

[help needed] trunk, changed configure.in

hi. I just did "svn up", ran autoconf, and then my normal config: ./configure --with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk \ --with-epm-url=" http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/ooo-extras/downloads/detail?name=3ade8cfe7e59ca8e65052644fed9fca4-epm-3.7-source.tar.gz&can=2&q=epm

Re: help needed with bundled help

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:18 AM, janI wrote: > On 26 October 2013 19:41, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, janI wrote: > > > > > I was just thinking, because I just merged l10n40 from trunk and got > very > > > tired. > > > > > > I think your idea of making it easy for t

Re: help needed with bundled help

On 26 October 2013 19:41, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, janI wrote: > > > I was just thinking, because I just merged l10n40 from trunk and got very > > tired. > > > > I think your idea of making it easy for translators and also documenters > is > > real good. > > > > But y

Re: help needed with bundled help

On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 8:40 AM, janI wrote: > I was just thinking, because I just merged l10n40 from trunk and got very > tired. > > I think your idea of making it easy for translators and also documenters is > real good. > > But you have spare cycles to spare for this, why not approach it > dif

Re: help needed with bundled help

I was just thinking, because I just merged l10n40 from trunk and got very tired. I think your idea of making it easy for translators and also documenters is real good. But you have spare cycles to spare for this, why not approach it differently and decouple the help system. Somewhere in the code

Re: help needed with bundled help

On 25 October 2013 18:33, Kay Schenk wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, janI wrote: > > > On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > > [top posting] > > > > > > never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't do a last > > step. > > > > > > Sorry for the noise. > >

Re: help needed with bundled help

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:36 PM, janI wrote: > On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > [top posting] > > > > never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't do a last > step. > > > > Sorry for the noise. > > > > the makefiles in helpcontent2, are like good italian spaghett

Re: help needed with bundled help

On 25 October 2013 01:06, Kay Schenk wrote: > [top posting] > > never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't do a last step. > > Sorry for the noise. > the makefiles in helpcontent2, are like good italian spaghetti, especially the util directories, where parts of what was done in

Re: help needed with bundled help

[top posting] never mind on this question. I found the answer -- I didn't do a last step. Sorry for the noise. On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > I'm trying to find my way around the bundled help with AOO -- how to put > stuff in, how to build etc to see changes. > > So, I m

help needed with bundled help

I'm trying to find my way around the bundled help with AOO -- how to put stuff in, how to build etc to see changes. So, I made some changes and followed instructions for building in: http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/online_help/OOo2HelpAuthoring.pdf pp. 21, 22 This was building ONLY help

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt >> wrote: >> > On 10/9/13 8:45 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: >> >> On 08.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> janI wrote: >> http://w

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt > wrote: > > On 10/9/13 8:45 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > >> On 08.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >>> janI wrote: > http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... > So my first question

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 10/9/13 8:45 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: >> On 08.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> janI wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... So my first question is - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a support

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On 10/9/13 8:45 AM, Herbert Duerr wrote: > On 08.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> janI wrote: >>> http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... >>> So my first question is >>> - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a supported platform, not >>> third party ? >>> - why does the porting

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On 08.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: janI wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... So my first question is - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a supported platform, not third party ? - why does the porting page not have a link to the mac page ? The Mac version used t

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On 8 October 2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > janI wrote: >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... >> >> So my first question is >> - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a supported platform, not >> third party ? >> - why does the porting page not have a link to the mac page ?

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

janI wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ ... So my first question is - what does a MAC page have to do here. MAC is a supported platform, not third party ? - why does the porting page not have a link to the mac page ? The Mac version used to be a port (you can still find outdated inf

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On 8 October 2013 21:38, Tal Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > [...] > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ > > This page has many problems: > I am not a mac specialist, but I just read the http://www.openoffice.org/porting

Re: Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote: > [...] > > http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ > This page has many problems: > > ... > > This is a good opportunity for a volunteer, new or old, to help > improve a high profile web page. I know nothing about the Mac, but I > can help review

Help Needed: Redo the /porting/mac page

We currently have this page which is visited over 4000 times *per day*. It has high visibility since it is the top search result when querying for "openoffice mac" and similar queries: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/mac/ This page has many problems: 1) The stock image is dated and out of cha

Re: URGENT HELP NEEDED

Hi, review the following document and let me know if you have any more questions regarding it: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/How_Tos/Calc:_FV_function There are some examples from the formula in discussion. On 9/15/13, Archana Gupta wrote: > Hi! I downloaded openoffice to use fo

  1   2   >