Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

enoffice.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows >>> >> [ ... ] >>> [knmc] >>> As we move forward to a general distribution here is an odt >>> revision of >>> the readme that can be used to generate

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/19/2016 01:09 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46 To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Am 08/16/2016 05

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:46 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > [ ... ] >

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] >> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 21:05 >> To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying op

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

--Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 21:08 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABL

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 21:05 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > > &g

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

nt: Thursday, August 11, 2016 21:08 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows >> >> BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE >> >> The scripts make life

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

hursday, August 11, 2016 21:08 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE > > The scripts make life much easier, since users don

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 21:24 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Dennis; > Attached is an od

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/14/2016 07:10 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

, 2016 09:15 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Am 08/14/2016 05:26 PM, schrieb Joost Andrae: > > Hi, > > > > I've installed the patch from > > > >>>>>> > >&g

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > [ ... ] > PS: >

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/14/2016 05:26 PM, schrieb Joost Andrae: Hi, I've installed the patch from The material is available at . into my Win7Pro AOO 4.1.2 installation. Before applying the patch I've checked the md5sum and it

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Hi, I've installed the patch from The material is available at . into my Win7Pro AOO 4.1.2 installation. Before applying the patch I've checked the md5sum and it was correct. I'm not sure that all users wil

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/12/2016 06:07 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: BETA 0.1.0 WITH AUTOMATED SCRIPTS IS NOW AVAILABLE The scripts make life much easier, since users don't have to go hunting for anything and digging around in operating-s

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

-Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Beta version 0.1.0 is now nearing completion

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Thanks for the checking, Marcus. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2016 13:20 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Win

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

t about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...w

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

e README that's included." Everything else should be >>>>>>> in the >>>>>>> various READMEs for each platform. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I should be done with all edits by this evening for a final review >>>>&g

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

ing the script files. This will be a great help for the normal users. If you need more details or tests just tell me. Marcus -Original Message- From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openo

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

us! ​ On 08/05/2016 09:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Appl

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

;>>> Ok, I've now moved on to creating zip files, etc for Linux32, Linux64 >>>> and Mac. >>>> >>>> My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use >>>> sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these. &

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

ha256 hash files. Marcus ​Thanks a bunch Marcus! ​ On 08/05/2016 09:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/13/2016 12:13 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: ... [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to c

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > >> On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> ... >> >>> [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the >>> 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system beca

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 13:49 > To: q...@openoffice.apache.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Attached is

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

ries] (was RE: [TESTING] >> Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) >> >> On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 08/09

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

01 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Beta version 0.1.0 is now nearing completion. It will include two scripts, one for applying the patch, the other for reverting the patch. The .zip will also have a c

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/12/2016 10:01 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: ... [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum t

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 8/12/2016 12:22 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: ... [Anecdotal Side Note: I just discovered that the MD5 hash for the 4.1.2 Windows .exe fails to check on my Windows system because of a defect in the .md5 file. For reasons unknown, the md5sum tool that I have requires exactly two spaces between

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Don Lewis [mailto:truck...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 14:41 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; ksch...@apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for W

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Replies in line > > Dennis E.

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

x27;ll check the > ZIPs and deliver the sha256 hash files. > > Marcus ​Thanks a bunch Marcus! ​ > > > > > On 08/05/2016 09:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >>> >>>> Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 >>>> [TESTI

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

.@acm.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 18:01 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Beta version 0.1.0 is now nearing completion. > > It will include two scripts,

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they s

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 11 Aug, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: > > > On 08/11/2016 12:50 PM, Kay sch...@apache.org wrote: >> >> >> On 08/09/2016 02:12 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> [top posting] >>> I'm in the process of trying to "sync" instructions for Linux32, >>> Linux64, and MacOSX at the moment. As far as instructi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Kay Schenk wrote: My openssl version on does NOT supply digest sha256. Is it OK to use sha1? MD5 already computed for each of these. Guidelines recommend SHA256. But it should not be difficult for you to get a sha256sum binary or a generic shasum binary to run as "shasum -a256 FILENAME". Re

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

gt;>> >>>> -----Original Message- >>>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 >>>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows &g

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

te: >> Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 >>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>> Subject

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

/2016 09:28 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 09:58 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Alpha versi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 08/10/2016 03:09 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote: 9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum : ... Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]? I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of running a rename script and copying in the library. I previously use

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> 9. aug. 2016 kl. 13.23 skrev Carl Marcum : > ... > Could we use a cross-platform installer like izpack [1]? > > I started trying it out last weekend and it looks like it could do the job of > running a rename script and copying in the library. I previously used izPack for cross platform insta

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 15:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > Am 08/0

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these?

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

ranching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] >> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

On 8/9/2016 8:29 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: ... [orcmid] I think requiring Java is a deal breaker, especially on Windows where it is not installed by default. If we required Java for AOO, that would be different, but we don't do that and we don't do anything to automate the user having the r

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 04:23 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > >

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they should contain. The ZIP file for Windows contains a LICENSE and NOTICE file as

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Office 4.1.2. - Dennis > -Original Message- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 20:31 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Win

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: >> >>> Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >>> Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/07/2016 07:30 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Feedback

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2016 09:21 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Feedback for the .zi

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Feedback for the .zip file: Do you have a reason in mind for the "apply" in the file name? I would delete this as I don't see a benefit and it would shorten the file name. When extracting a ZIP file I cannot stand it when no subdirectory is included and the files are extracted where the curre

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Am 08/06/2016 02:41 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: -Original Message- From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 10:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) > > Am 08/0

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

-Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 03:30 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they should contain. The ZIP file for Windows contains a

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/05/2016 12:30 PM, schrieb Carl Marcum: On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The fi

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: [ ... ] hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. Should we get started on these? it depends what we want that they should contain. The ZIP file for Windows contains a LICENSE and NOTICE file

RE: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

> -Original Message- > From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 09:36 > To: OOo Apache ; Dennis Hamilton > > Subject: Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] > Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows) >

[PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

Branching off the part that is not about the Windows 4.1.2-patch1 [TESTING]. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2016 15:52 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-pat

Re: [PACKAGING 4.1.2-patch1 Binaries] (was RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows)

gt; To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > > > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > [ ... ] > > > > > > hmmm...well no zips for Mac, Linux32, or Linux 64 -- yet. > > > >

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

ilto:cmar...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, August 5, 2016 03:30 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: > > Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: > >> On 08/04/20

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On 08/04/2016 06:52 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/05/2016 12:26 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

On 08/04/2016 02:21 PM, Marcus wrote: > Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: >> Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. >> >> The files to be used in testing are at >> . >>

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Am 08/03/2016 05:31 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at . The files to be tested and reviewed are * README-

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > >> -Original Message- From: Keith N. McKenna >> [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 >> 12:47 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying >> openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:47 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Replies in line > > Dennis E.

Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Replies in line Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. > > The files to be used in testing are at > . > > The files to be tested and reviewed are > > * REA

RE: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

e.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Hi all > > > > > REQUESTED TESTING > >* [OPTIONAL] If you are able to check any of the .asc, > .md5, and .sha256 files against the .zip, report a

[TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows

Testing of an Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2-patch1 procedure is requested. The files to be used in testing are at . The files to be tested and reviewed are * README-4.1.2-patch1-apply-Windows.txt The description of t