> -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 14:40 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Cc: q...@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [TESTING] Applying openoffice-4.1.2-patch1 for Windows > > Am 08/16/2016 05:26 AM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > > BETA 0.2.0 IS NOW AVAILABLE > > > > This is a cleanup version. It is hoped that this will be the last > change before bumping the version to 1.0.0 and making general > availability. > > > > One important change: > > > > The names of the files have been changed. > > > > The README is now named README-4.1.2-patch1-Windows.txt. > > > > The zip and the related .asc, .md5, .sha1, and .sha256 files all > have the base name > > apache-openoffice-4.1.2-patch1-Win_x86.zip > > > > The two scripts also have simpler names: > > > > APPLY-4.1.2-patch1.bat > > REVERT-4.1.2-patch1.bat > > > > The files are still available at > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2- > patch1/Windows> > > > > Now it is worth testing enough to know there is no regression and that > APPLY and REVERT operate properly as before. > > I've downloaded the new ZIP and tested again: > > - Download new ZIP file OK > - Unzipping OK > - ASC signature OK > - MD5 OK > - SHA1 OK > - SHA256 OK > - "tl.dll.new" ASC signature OK > - "tl.dll.old" ASC signature OK > > The both .bat files differ from the past ones. I've not run the new ones > again but looked closely to the diff output. There are no functional > changes but only for file name and version. > > If I should run them again, just tell me. > > Otherwise I think also this ZIP is ready to do its work. > > Marcus [orcmid]
That's great, Marcus. Thanks. I will go ahead and cut 1.0.0 now. - Dennis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
