On 11/10/2017 Don Lewis wrote:
That's a good way to reduce the time to the official release, but if we
had done this for RC4, then the release would have been happened before
the latest regression was reported.
Yes, the idea is not to give people another opportunity to block the
release! Just
Sounds like a great plan!
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area (not
> public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it). This is the
> place where our official binaries are served from.
>
Will do... Give me ~1hr :)
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 5:50 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 11 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Wed Oct 11 16:07:28 2017
>> New Revision: 22218
>>
>> Log:
>> prep top level dir for 4.1.4-RC5 builds
>>
>> Added:
>>dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/
>>dev/
On 11 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
> (not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
> This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
>
> Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I wil
On 11 Oct, j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Wed Oct 11 16:07:28 2017
> New Revision: 22218
>
> Log:
> prep top level dir for 4.1.4-RC5 builds
>
> Added:
> dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/
> dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/
> dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/sources/
>
If you upload t
Am 11.10.2017 um 23:29 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
(not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
Instead of waiting for a successful vote,
I've removed the 4.1.4-RC4 files from the SourceForge distribution area
(not public yet: it is "staged" and only project members can see it).
This is the place where our official binaries are served from.
Instead of waiting for a successful vote, I will gradually upload
4.1.4-RC5 there in the
Uploads of AOO 4.1.4-RC5 for Linux 32 bit builds are being
committed as we speak...
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> Official SVN rev will be:
>
>1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
> URL: https://svn.apa
Neither Apache OpenOffice 4.1.2 or 4.2 can run Java (jdk-9.jdk) on macOS 10.12 (Sierra) or
10.13 (High Sierra). Both can run Java (jdk1.8.0_144.jdk).
I also have the legacy Apple Java (1.6.0.jdk) installed.
I have JavaAppletPlugin (Java 9 build 181) in my Internet Plug-ins folder.
Note: LibreO
Am 11.10.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
We can always change that later...
@Marcus:
Can you re-add 4.1.4 (also for Target Milestone)?
done for milestone, version and lastest confirmation.
Marcus
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:24 schrieb Mathias Röllig:
This is a very good description. Mathia
Am 11.10.2017 um 01:30 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10.10.2017 um 22:56 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 10, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 10.10.2017 um 22:03 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
On Oct 10, 2017, at
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
I decided that, procedural
Jim, you are the Boss! :)
It is good you stay Release Manager! I appreciate that a lot!
Am 11. Oktober 2017 18:27:55 MESZ schrieb Kay Schenk :
>
>On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
>>
>>> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski
>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> After a night's sleep I decided tha
OK, then I will start again with 1811857.
Am 11.10.2017 um 19:51 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Official SVN rev will be:
>
> 1811857.
>
> % svn info
> Path: .
> Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
> URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
> Relat
Official SVN rev will be:
1811857.
% svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 1
On 10/11/2017 05:46 AM, Pedro Lino wrote:
On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
+1
my +1 also!
So t
We can always change that later...
@Marcus:
Can you re-add 4.1.4 (also for Target Milestone)?
Thanks, Matthias
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:24 schrieb Mathias Röllig:
>> This is a very good description. Mathias, have you already copied it
>> to Bugzilla? (I've also tested with business cards, but this
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /Users/jim/src/asf/code/follow/aoo-414
URL: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Relative URL: ^/openoffice/branches/AOO414
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Revision: 181182
Jim,
can you give a short hint when you start building RC5 and the revision#?
Matthias
Am 11.10.2017 um 14:02 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
> and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)
>
> Thx!
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:
I am starting on macOS and Linux-64 builds for 4.1.4-RC5 as we speak.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:20:53 -0400
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
>
> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
>
> I
> On October 11, 2017 at 12:20 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
+1
> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will th
Jim Jagielski has granted review:
Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
Attachment 86222: Labels patch
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86222&action=edit
--- Comment #1 from Jim Jagielski ---
Created attachme
Jim Jagielski has granted Patricia Shanahan 's
request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
This is a very good description. Mathias, have you already copied it to
Bugzilla? (I've also tested with business cards, but this one looks more
generic).
Done.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
But 4.1.4 isn't available for version in bugzilla. Neither as »Version«
nor as »La
Patricia Shanahan has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127553: update links doesn't work for sections in 4.1.4
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127553
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.or
Jim Jagielski has granted Matthias Seidel
's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127538: SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande"
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
Jim Jagielski has granted Matthias Seidel
's request for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127141: Incorrectly translated text in Installer
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ope
Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127538: SV translation: "Basic" mistranslated as "grundläggande"
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.ap
Matthias Seidel has asked for 4.1.4_release_blocker:
Issue 127141: Incorrectly translated text in Installer
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For add
Lets go ahead and add those. Add the flag and request them and I'll review
and likely approve; at least we will doc them ;)
Thx!
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
>
> No.
>
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
>> to it the 2 patches that have be
Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
No.
>> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>>
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
>> https://bz.apache
Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> If time permits, could you have a look at:
>
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
>
> Only small translation
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that.
So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply
to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415
(after adjusting the version n
Hi Jim,
If time permits, could you have a look at:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538
Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4.
Regards, Matthias
P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5
Am 1
After a night's sleep I decided that we should release
the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing
one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense.
So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it?
I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature,
and, as such,
As noted, the issue is that AOO414 is tagged.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hi all
> On October 10, 2017 at 8:47 PM Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> imho:
> Better to spend more time on a qualitatively good release than to release a
> less good release overhasty.
+1
> Please don't forget: the quality of AOO is the main argument for many users
> to choose AOO, especially compar
39 matches
Mail list logo
