Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz? > On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > If time permits, could you have a look at: > > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 > https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538 > > Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4. > > Regards, Matthias > > P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5 > > > Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release >> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing >> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. >> >> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? >> >> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, >> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. >> >> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply >> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415 >> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can >> start on 4.1.4-RC5 >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
