Hi Jim, If time permits, could you have a look at:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538 Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4. Regards, Matthias P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5 Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. > > So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? > > I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, > and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. > > So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply > to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415 > (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can > start on 4.1.4-RC5 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
