On Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:20:53 -0400 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release > the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing > one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. > > So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? > > I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, > and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. > > So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply > to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415 > (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can > start on 4.1.4-RC5 > I think this is the best solution. -- Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
