Am 11.10.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > Are these requested as 4.1.4 blockers in Bugz?
No. >> On Oct 11, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Matthias Seidel <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> If time permits, could you have a look at: >> >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127141 >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127538 >> >> Only small translation fixes, but they didn't make it into 4.1.4. >> >> Regards, Matthias >> >> P.S.: I am also OK, if we go "regression only" for RC5 >> >> >> Am 11.10.2017 um 13:20 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> After a night's sleep I decided that we should release >>> the best possible version of AOO 4.1.x as possible. Releasing >>> one w/ 2 known regressions just doesn't make sense. >>> >>> So the remaining question was/is: What do we call it? >>> >>> I decided that, procedurally, the AOO414 tag was premature, >>> and, as such, can be removed. I've gone ahead and done that. >>> >>> So the plan is to "re-open" branches/AOO414; I will then apply >>> to it the 2 patches that have been applied to branches/AOO415 >>> (after adjusting the version numbers). At that point, we can >>> start on 4.1.4-RC5 >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
