All,
One additional minor change "Grouped.named" has been changed to
"Grouped.as". I've updated the KIP with this change.
Thanks,
Bill
+1 from me.
As for closing the vote, it needs to be open for a minimum of 72 and
requires three binding +1 votes. Additionally, there needs more +1 binding
votes than -1 votes. The description for the lazy majority vote process is
described here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/
All,
I have updated KIP-167 to include the bootstrapping status of any
GlobalKTables defined in the application.
The KIP has been updated:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-167%3A+Add+interface+for+the+state+store+restoration+process
Thanks,
Bill
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9/11/17 3:04 PM, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > It seems that there is no further concern with the KIP-17
+1 for the KIP and +1 on renaming "range" to "fetchAll"
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> BTW, Xavier has an argument to rename "range" as it does not take a key or
> key range at all. I'd propose we rename this function to "fetchAll".
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Wed,
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Paolo Patierno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> because I don't see any further discussion around KIP-204 (
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> 204+%3A+adding+records+deletion+operation+to+the+new+Admin+Client+API)
> and I have alrea
Thanks for the KIP Matthias, +1 from me.
-Bill
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> lgtm
>
> bq. pass both parameter
>
> parameter should be in plural.
> Same with 'two new configuration parameter'
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Damian Guy wrote:
>
> > Thanks Matthi
I'm leaning towards option 3, although option 2 is a reasonable tradeoff
between the two.
Overall I'm leaning towards option 3 because:
1. As Guozhang has said we are failing "fast enough" with an Exception
from the first rebalance.
2. Less complexity/maintenance cost by not having a tra
istration, could we
> > also
> > >> do
> > >>> this after the rebalance callback as in the main loop? By doing this
> we
> > >> can
> > >>> effectively swallow-and-retry-in-next-loop as we did for non-global
> > >> stores.
Thanks for the KIP, +1
-Bill
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > Hi @all,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for KIP-224:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 224%3A+Add+config
+1
Thanks,
Bill
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Colin
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 10:02, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I have filed a new KIP on adding AdminClient into Streams for internal
> > topic management.
> >
> > Please review
Patrice,
Thanks for reporting this. I'll have a look at what you've posted on
Github.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Patrice Chalcol wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have implemented a basic application which uses kafka streams stores and
> interactive queries, available there :
> https:/
Hi Panuwat,
Thanks for the KIP, overall looks good to me.
I want to play the devil's advocate for a second and ask do we want to keep
the older method with the extra parameters vs. deprecation?
Although ATM I can't think of a good reason to keep the old method with the
extra parameters.
Thanks,
Matthias,
Overall I agree with what you've presented here.
Initially, I was hesitant to remove information from the context of the
result records (Joins or Aggregations) with the thought that when there are
unexpected results, the source information would be useful for tracing back
where the erro
Hi Patrice,
I haven't forgotten, just sidetracked with other things. I'll get back to
you by the end of the week.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Patrice,
>
> Thanks for reporting this. I'll have a look at what you've p
Thanks for the clearly written KIP, no further comments from my end.
-Bill
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> There is already a vote thread for this KIP. I can bump it so that it’s
> towards the top of your inbox.
>
> With regard to your concerns:
>
> 1) We do not have the "P
+1
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> Bumping this thread so it’s visible given that the conversation on KIP-210
> has converged again.
>
> Current tally is 2 binding +1s, and 2 non-binding +1s.
>
> On November 8, 2017 at 12:26:32 PM, Damian Guy (damian@gmail.com)
> wrote:
I'm getting to this a little late, but as for the missing timestamp
semantics, it's a +1 from me for using Long.MIN_VALUE for missing
timestamps for the reasons outlined by Matthias previously.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:05 AM, Dong Lin wrote:
> Sounds good. I don't think there is co
ich version of Kafka are you using for this demo app?
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Patrice Chalcol
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bill,
> >
> > Thanks, I understand. Let me know if you need further information.
> >
> > Regards,
> &
+1
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding), thanks!
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Here is the discussion thread:
> >
> > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND12QnH514pPO9?subj=
> > Re+DISCUSS+KIP+239+Add+queryableStoreName+to+Glo
of
> >
> > SOURCE -> KTABLESOURCE -> KTABLEFILTER -> JOIN -> SINK
> >
> > we build
> >
> > SOURCE -> KTABLEFILTER -> KTABLESOURCE -> JOIN -> SINK
> >
> > We should build a topology like this from the beginning and not have
> > a
+1
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:09 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 1:49 AM, Tom Bentley
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On 18 December 2017 at 23:28, Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks for the KIP.
> > >
> > > --Vah
>>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 at 17:52 Gwen Shapira wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Make sense. We have a supplier for every other client type :)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 a
Jorge,
Thanks for the KIP, I know this is a feature others in the community have
been interested in getting into Kafka Streams.
I took a quick pass over it, and I have one initial question.
We recently reduced overloads with KIP-182, and in this KIP we are
increasing them again.
I can see from
Thanks for the KIP. +1 for me.
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:22 PM Ted Yu wrote:
> +1 from me as well.
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP Boyang!
> >
> > I don't have any further comments.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > @Ted: This is a rather simpl
+1
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 12/26/17 9:00 PM, Panuwat Anawatmongkhon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I would like to start the vote thread.
> > This is link for the kip.
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-233%3A+Simplify+
> StreamsBuil
Thanks for the KIP Guozhang, +1 for me.
-Bill
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 1:59 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Guozhang!
>
> Would it make sense to add a default implementation for the new method?
> I am not sure, and I actually think it would not make sense:
>
> - Kafka Streams pro
Thanks for the KIP, Rohan.
+1 (non-binding).
-Bill
On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 1:24 PM Manikumar wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:01 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP.
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 1:56 PM Rohan Desai
> > wrote:
> > >
Congrats Randall!
-Bill
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 9:17 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The PMC of Apache Kafka is happy to announce another new committer joining
> the project today: we have invited Randall Hauch as a project committer and
> he has accepted.
>
> Randall has been particip
Hi Sophie,
Thanks for the KIP! My apologies for the delay in voting.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:59 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:07 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 2/14/19 3:36 PM, Sophie
Thanks for the KIP Boyang.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 12:31 PM Boyang Chen wrote:
> Oh, good catch Guozhang. I just renamed the function to `sessionedTable`
> to be consistent, thanks!
>
>
> From: Guozhang Wang
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 1
;
> >
> > This contradict the non-naming of stores from the very beginning.
> >
> >
> > Also, the KIP still contains the question about `join(GlobalKTable,
> > KeyValueMapper, ValueJoiner)` and `leftJoin(GlobalKTable,
> > KeyValueMapper, ValueJoiner)`. I
o that it will be much easier
> to review.
>
> Thanks
>
> Le jeu. 21 févr. 2019 à 23:54, Bill Bejeck a écrit :
>
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > Overall the KIP LGTM. Once you've addressed the final comments from
> > Matthias I think we can put this
, and it also creates more ambiguity in the API, since there are
> >> then multiple ways to say the same thing.
> >>
> >> Maybe in the future, if there's some automatic default configuration for
> >> suppression, then we can add `as(name)`, but
t;>> comment on it regarding the newly added APIs. Could you take a look? If
> >>>>> that makes sense could you update the wiki page to make sure we have
> >> all
> >>>>> the relevant public API changes.
> >>>>>
> >>>&
t;>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 5:04 PM Guozhang Wang
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hello Florian,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for the writeup! I made a pass on the wiki page itself and
> >
+1 (non-binding)
- Validated signature
- build from source and ran tests (all passed)
- verified the quick start and Kafka Streams quick start
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 5:56 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the third candidate for release
All,
I'd like to jump-start the discussion for KIP- 418.
Here's the original message:
Hello,
I'd like to start a discussion about KIP-418. Please take a look at the
KIP if you can, I would appreciate any feedback :)
KIP-418:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-418%3A+A+metho
predicate1,
predicate2);
branches[0].filter().mapValues(...)..
branches[1].selectKey(...).groupByKey().
Thanks!
Bill
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 6:15 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to jump-start the discussion for KIP- 418.
>
> Here's the original message:
+1 for me,
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 4:13 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Though note that we cannot make such changes in older versions since even
> if we release new versions out of those branches they are considered
> bug-fix only and hence should not have any interface
Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding)
-Bill
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 12:42 PM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
> For consistency, should we also set retention.ms to -1 instead of
> Long.MAX_VALUE?
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:59 PM Manikumar
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks fo
Hi,
You're already in Jira as a contributor, but I can't seem to find you in
the Apache Confluence (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence) can you confirm
your account there?
Thanks,
Bill
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 1:42 AM slim ouertani wrote:
> Hello,
>
> user id: ouertani
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
Hi Anurag,
No problem we'll just need your Apache Jira user id to get you added.
Thanks,
Bill
On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 3:29 PM Anurag Saxena wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please add me to kafka contributor list so that I can start fixing Kafka
> bugs and raise PRs.
>
> Regards,
> Anurag.
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 4:49 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > You're already in Jira as a contributor, but I can't seem to find you in
> > the Apache Confluence (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence) can you
> > confirm
> > your account
Hi Sophie,
Thanks for the KIP, it's a +1 from me.
-Bill
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:09 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello Sophie,
>
> Thanks for the KIP, I've made a pass on it and it lgtm.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:32 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > This
Thanks for the KIP Sophie.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:14 AM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Sophie!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 4/8/19 5:26 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for
Done
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:40 AM Łukasz Antoniak
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please grant me write access to KIP proposals? I intend to make
> progress on KAFKA-6393. Wiki ID: lukasz (apache.org).
>
> Best regards,
> Lukasz Antoniak
>
Thanks for the KIP Sophie.
I have a couple of additional comments.
The current proposal only considers stream-time.
While I support this, each time we introduce a new operation based on
stream-time, invariably users request that operation support wall-clock
time as well. Would we want to consid
Thanks for the KIP Maarten.
I also agree that keeping the `withLoggingDisabled()` and
`withLoggingEnabled(Map)` methods is the better option.
When it comes to educating the users on the downside of disabling logging,
IMHO I think a comment in the JavaDoc should be sufficient.
-Bill
On Fri, Apr
You're all set now! I look forward to your KIP.
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 1:15 AM Jukka Karvanen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you please grant me write access to KIP proposals?
> I am planning to make KIP for KAFKA-8233: Helper class to make it simpler
> to write test logic with TopologyT
Thanks for the KIP.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:58 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> Hi Maarten Duijn,
>
> Thank you for driving this.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:21 AM Maarten Duijn
> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > There has been informal ag
Brandt,
You should be all set now.
-Bill
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:36 PM Newton, Brandt (CAI - Burlington) <
brandt.new...@coxautoinc.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I’d like to contribute to Kafka. Can someone please add me as a
> contributor to JIRA so I can assign an issue to myself? My username is
Congrats Matthias! Well deserved!
-Bill
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 5:35 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I'm glad to announce that Matthias J. Sax is now a member of Kafka PMC.
>
> Matthias has been a committer since Jan. 2018, and since then he continued
> to be active in the communi
Alex, you are all set now.
-Bill
On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:32 PM Alex Liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to have permissions to create content in this page:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals
> My wiki user is "alexliu".
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
Thanks for the KIP Boyang. I have no additional comments from the ones
already presented.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:35 PM Boyang Chen wrote:
> Thank you Guozhang!
>
>
> From: Guozhang Wang
> Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2019 3:54 AM
> To: dev@kaf
+1(binding)
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 3:07 AM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 4/26/19 6:16 AM, Boyang Chen wrote:
> > Hey friends,
> >
> > I would like to start the vote for KIP-462:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-462%3A+Use+local+thread+id+
Thanks for the KIP Sophie.
+1(binding)
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:51 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks, Sophie, I reviewed the KIP, and I agree this is the best /
> only-practical approach.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:23 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
Done. Thanks for contributing!
-Bill
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:15 AM Kengo Seki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just filed KAFKA-8337 and would like to assign it to myself.
> Would you add me to the contributors list?
> My username is "sekikn".
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Kengo Seki
>
+1 (binding)
Makes a lot of sense to me.
-Bill
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 2:05 PM Gwen Shapira wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Hell yeah!
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 3:34 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
>
> > I would like to start the vote for KIP-258:
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAF
Responding here on the dev list as well.
Thanks for your interest in contributing!
You should be all set now.
Thanks,
Bill
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:34 PM hu xiaohua
wrote:
>
> I want create my KIP ,but I havn't a permission,please give me permission
> to create KIP,My Wiki ID is Flowermin.T
Hi Bruno,
Thanks for the KIP, this will be a useful addition.
Overall the KIP looks good to me, and I have two minor comments.
1. For the tags should, I'm wondering if rocksdb-state-id should be
rocksdb-store-id
instead?
2. With the compaction metrics, would it be possible to add total
compacti
Hi,
Thanks for your interest in contributing to Apache Kafka.
You should be all set now.
Thanks,
Bill
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:31 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I want to contribute to Apache Kafka.
>
> Would you please give me the contributor permission?
>
> My JIRA ID is shark.chen.
>
>
>
>
Hi Ivan,
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka.
You should be all set now.
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:34 AM Ivan Yurchenko
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to be able to create KIPs. Could someone please set up the
> permissions for me? The username is ivanyu .
> Thanks!
>
> Ivan
>
Hi,
You're all set now! Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka.
-Bill
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:30 AM John Park <87johnpar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My name is In Park and I would like to contribute to Apache Kafka.
> Could you give me contributor permissions?
> My Jira ID is : in-park
Hi Dulvin,
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka. I've assigned KAFKA-7760 to
you. I've also added you to the contributors list so in the future you can
assign tickets yourself tickets.
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:17 AM Dulvin Witharane wrote:
> Please assign the above to me.
>
Hi Carlos,
Thanks again for your interest in Apache Kafka. I've added you as a
contributor so you can now self-assign tickets.
-Bill
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:14 AM Carlos Manuel Duclos-Vergara <
carlos.duc...@schibsted.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Yes, I read the guidelines. I forgot to mention the JIR
Vikash,
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka. You're all set now.
-Bill
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:45 PM Vikash Kumar
wrote:
> Sorry I forgot to mention my user ID.
>
> My User ID : krvikash
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 10:12 PM Vikash Kumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to start contri
Igor,
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka. You're all set now.
-Bill
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:36 PM Igor Soarez wrote:
> JIRA username: soarez
> GitHub username: soarez
>
> Looking to assign https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8526 to
> myself
>
> --
> Igor Soarez
>
Mark,
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka. You're in the contributors list
now.
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:37 PM Mark Cox wrote:
> Hello AK,
>
> Could I gain contributor permissions for the Apache Kafka project please?
>
> My GitHub ID is "MarkC0x" (note the zero)
>
> Cheers
Hi Thomas,
You're all set now.
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 8:41 PM Thomas Zhou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to contribute to Kafka, could you please give me contributor
> permission?
> My Jira id is - thomas930410
>
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
Hi Anastasia,
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka. You're all set now.
-Bill
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 4:36 PM Anastasia Vela wrote:
> My user ID is anastasiavela.
>
> Anastasia
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:18 AM Anastasia Vela
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to contribute to Ap
All,
I'd like to start a discussion for adding a Materialized configuration
object to KStream.join for naming state stores involved in joins.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+Materialized+to+Join
Your comments and suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
Bill
Hi Bruno,
Just getting caught up on this KIP thread. Looks good to me, and I don't
have any additional comments to what's already been presented.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:42 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> John and Guozhang,
>
> thank you for your comments.
>
> @Guozhang could you ple
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:19 PM John Roesler wrote:
> I'm +1 (nonbinding)
>
> Thanks!
> -John
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:48 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to start the voting on KIP-471:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KA
Sorry for being late to the party.
I've reviewed the KIP and it's a great step in the right direction.
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Bill
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:42 AM John Roesler wrote:
> Not that it changes the outcome, but I'm also +1 (nonbinding).
>
> Been wanting to do this for a while, thank
Jukka,
Thanks for the KIP. I like the changes overall.
One thing I wanted to confirm, and this may be me being paranoid, but will
the changes for input/output topic affect how the TopologyTestDriver works
with internal topics when there are sub-topologies created?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:05 PM
nder option 2 above, this behavior would
> > change to NOT provision a state store and instead just consult the
> > ValueGetter. To get back to the current behavior, users would have to
> > add a "bytes store supplier" to the Materialized to indicate that,
> > y
proposed).
> >
> >
> > (2) `TopologyTestDriver#createInputTopic`: might it be worth to add
> > overload to initialize the timetamp and auto-advance feature directly?
> > Otherwise, uses always need to call `configureTiming` as an extra call?
> >
> >
> &
Hi Anastasia,
You're all set now!
-Bill
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 1:50 PM Anastasia Vela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I get access to create KIPs on the Kafka Confluence page?
> Email: av...@confleunt.io
> UserID: avela
>
> Thanks,
> Anastasia
>
Sorry for coming late to the party.
As for the naming I'm in favor of RecordProcessor as well.
I agree that we should not take on doing all of the package movements as
part of this KIP, especially as John has pointed out, it will be an
opportunity to discuss some clean-up on individual classes wh
Thanks Ismael!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:41 AM Ismael Juma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After updating some jobs to the "modern" PR builder, I noticed several
> regressions and shared the details in the Apache Builds mailing list.
> Thankfully, the team has re-enabled the old PR builder. I have reverte
gt;>> * the WindowStore itself is fine, if overly broad,
> >>>> since the only two methods we need are `window.put(key, value,
> >>>> context().timestamp())` and `WindowStoreIterator iter =
> >>>> window.fetch(key, timeFrom, timeTo)`.
> >>>>
Hi Manish,
If you do a search for tasks with the label "newbie" you'll find tickets
that are great for making your first contribution(s)
Thanks,
Bill
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 11:39 AM Manish G
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a newbie here, so not sure if I can work on tickets straightaway. But
> if s
Thanks for the KIP, seems like a good change.
+1 (binding)
-Bill
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:47 PM Bruno Cadonna wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Bruno
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:45 PM John Roesler wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kafka devs,
> >
> > Yesterday, I proposed KIP-488 as a min
Hi John,
Thanks for the updates.
I like RunningCount and RunningSum.
What about WindowedCount, WindowedSum instead of Moving?
I'm just throwing this out there as Windowed seems more intuitive to me,
but I'm not married to the idea.
-Bill
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 5:09 PM John Roesler wrote:
>
personally fine with either `MovingXxx`,
> > `WindowedXxx`, or `RunningXxx` -- to me, that are all equally good to
> > describe the semantics.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/16/19 2:25 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrot
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka.
You're all set with Jira, but I couldn't find your user name in the wiki.
The wiki requires a separate username creation.
Can you add yourself there and ping the list again and we'll get you added.
Thanks,
Bill
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:42 AM Omar Al-Sa
as
> previously derailed this KIP discussion. In the interest of just
> closing the gap and keeping the API change small, it seems better to
> just go with documentation for now.
>
> Thanks again,
> -John
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:45 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >
> &g
s again!
> Omar
>
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 19:06, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka.
> >
> > You're all set with Jira, but I couldn't find your user name in the wiki.
> > The wiki requires a separate username creation.
>
+1 (binding) for the updated KIP.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 4:09 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Hey, Bruno and Bill,
>
> Since you cast your votes before the KIP was updated, do you mind
> re-casting just so we can be sure you're still in favor?
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:01 PM Gu
Thanks for the KIP, looks like a great addition.
+1 (binding)
-Bill
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 5:55 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:23 AM David Arthur
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding, looks like a nice improvement. Thanks!
> >
> > -Davi
Hi Lavani,
Thanks for resurrecting this KIP.
I'm also a +1 for adding a partition option. In addition to the reason
provided by John, my reasoning is:
1. Users may want to use something other than hash-based partitioning
2. Users may wish to partition on something different than the key
Thanks for the KIP looks to be very helpful.
+1(binding)
-Bill
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 5:01 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks Daniyar!
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:04 PM John Roesler wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Daniyar,
> >
> > I'm +1 (nonbinding)
> >
> > -John
> >
> > On Tue, Jun
All,
After a great discussion on KIP-479 (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-479%3A+Add+Materialized+to+Join)
I'd
like to start a vote.
Thanks,
Bill
Hi Guozang,
Thanks for the KIP, looks like a great improvement. +1 for me.
-Bill
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 8:18 PM Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi, Guozhang,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1
>
> Jun
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:40 PM Jason Gustafson
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guozhang,
> >
> > I agree it is misleading
Thanks for the KIP.
+1 (binding)
-Bill
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Yeah I think I agree with you.
>
> +1 (binding) from me.
>
>
> Guozhang
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:43 AM John Roesler wrote:
>
> > Hi Guozhang,
> >
> > Thanks! I just replied in the discuss thr
Thanks for your interest in Apache Kafka.
You should be set now.
Thanks,
Bill
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 9:40 AM Gokul Ramanan Subramanian <
gokul24...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> In order to start contributing to Apache Kafka project, could I please
> request contributor access to JI
Thanks for the KIP Levani.
+1 (binding)
-Bill
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 3:37 PM Levani Kokhreidze
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Still waiting for feedback on this KIP.
> Please let me know if you have any concerns and/or questions.
>
> Regards,
> Levani
>
>
> > On Jul 24, 2019, at 8:20 PM, Sophie Blee-Gol
from `long` for timestamps to `Instant` and
> > > > `Duration` ?
> > > >> This version startTimestamp is Instant and autoAdvance Duration in
> > > > Initialization and with manual configured collection pipe methods.
> > > >> Now timestamp of TestRecord is
ul 29, 2019 at 6:03 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:39 PM Matthias J. Sax
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On 7/25/19 1:05 PM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > After a great discussion on
101 - 200 of 1052 matches
Mail list logo
