Thanks for the KIP.  +1 for me.

On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 6:22 PM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 from me as well.
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP Boyang!
> >
> > I don't have any further comments.
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > @Ted: This is a rather simple KIP, thus, skipping the DISCUSS thread
> > seems ok to me.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> >
> > @Boyang: it's recommended to use this format for the subject
> >
> > "[VOTE] KIP-245: ..."
> >
> > Same for DISCUSS threads. People are used to those headlines and they
> > pay more attention than. For this KIP, just leave it as it though. For
> > future reference only
> > .
> >
> >
> > On 12/26/17 4:55 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> > > Normally a DISCUSS thread precedes VOTE thread so that people have
> ample
> > time examining the proposal.
> > > -------- Original message --------From: Boyang Chen <
> bche...@outlook.com>
> > Date: 12/26/17  1:22 AM  (GMT-07:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject:
> > Vote for KIP-245: Use Properties instead of StreamsConfig in KafkaStreams
> > constructor
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I'm Boyang who is a newbie contributor to Kafka. I would like to start
> a
> > vote for the KIP-245:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> >
> 245%3A+Use+Properties+instead+of+StreamsConfig+in+KafkaStreams+constructor
> > >
> > >
> > > This is linked with JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/KAFKA-6386
> > >
> > > [KAFKA-6386] Deprecate KafkaStreams constructor taking ...<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6386>
> > > issues.apache.org
> > > Currently, KafkaStreams constructor has overloads that take either
> > Properties or StreamsConfig a parameters. Because StreamsConfig is
> > immutable and is created from a ...
> > >
> > > And my pull request is here:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4354
> > >
> > >
> > > Since this is my first time doing this, feel free to let me know if
> this
> > is the correct format!
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Boyang
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to