+1

On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote:

> Bumping this thread so it’s visible given that the conversation on KIP-210
> has converged again.
>
> Current tally is 2 binding +1s, and 2 non-binding +1s.
>
> On November 8, 2017 at 12:26:32 PM, Damian Guy (damian....@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 at 16:50 Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Yes. A KIP needs 3 binding "+1" to be accepted.
> >
> > You can still work on the PR and get it ready to get merged -- I am
> > quite confident that this KIP will be accepted :)
> >
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 11/4/17 3:56 PM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> > > Bump! I believe I need two more binding +1's to proceed?
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:49 AM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (binding) from me. Thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The vote should stay open for at least 72 hours. The bylaws can be
> > >> found
> > >>>> here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Bylaws
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hello all,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> It seems like discussion around KIP-210 has gone to a lull. I've
> got
> > >>> some
> > >>>>> candidate work underway for it already, so I'd like to go ahead and
> > >> call
> > >>>>> it
> > >>>>> to a vote.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> For reference, the KIP can be found here:
> > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-210+-+
> > >>>>>
> > Provide+for+custom+error+handling++when+Kafka+Streams+fails+to+produce
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Also, how long to vote threads stay open generally before changing
> > the
> > >>>>> status of the KIP?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>> Matt
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> -- Guozhang
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> -- Guozhang
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to