rdblue commented on a change in pull request #7: Allow custom hadoop properties
to be loaded in the Spark data source
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/7#discussion_r240717374
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #7: Allow custom hadoop properties
to be loaded in the Spark data source
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/7#discussion_r240717846
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #7: Allow custom hadoop
properties to be loaded in the Spark data source
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/7#discussion_r240760798
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
mccheah commented on issue #45: Lazily submit tasks in ParallelIterable and add
cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#issuecomment-446334195
Still looking over this, but separately I wonder if we've looked into Java's
built in parallel iterators, or
[split
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #7: Allow custom hadoop properties
to be loaded in the Spark data source
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/7#discussion_r240763430
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
rdblue commented on issue #45: Lazily submit tasks in ParallelIterable and add
cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#issuecomment-446338379
I'm not that impressed with the Spliterator API, and it wouldn't really help
here where we want to control when backg
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240776853
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
##
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #7: Allow custom hadoop
properties to be loaded in the Spark data source
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/7#discussion_r240778558
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
rdblue commented on issue #6: Support customizing the location where data is
written in Spark
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/6#issuecomment-446352792
Merged. Thanks @mccheah!
This is an automated messag
rdblue closed pull request #6: Support customizing the location where data is
written in Spark
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/6
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance
mccheah commented on issue #20: Encryption in Data Files
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/issues/20#issuecomment-446404505
@rdblue @omalley I moved the architecture to
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LptmFB7az2rLnou27QK_KKHgjcA5vKza0dWj4h8fkno/edit?usp=sharing.
Please
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240885973
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
##
@
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240886083
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ThreadPools.java
##
@@ -27
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240886393
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ThreadPools.java
##
@@ -27
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240886083
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ThreadPools.java
##
@@ -27
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240886393
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ThreadPools.java
##
@@ -27
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240885973
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
##
@
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r240901429
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
##
@
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r241103604
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
##
rdsr commented on a change in pull request #45: Lazily submit tasks in
ParallelIterable and add cancellation.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/45#discussion_r241119180
##
File path: core/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/util/ParallelIterable.java
##
@
rdblue commented on issue #20: Encryption in Data Files
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/issues/20#issuecomment-446690252
@mccheah, can you also start a thread on the dev list to point out this
spec? I think other people will probably be interested that aren't necessarily
rdblue opened a new pull request #48: Fix commit retry with manfiest lists.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/48
A manifest list is created for every commit attempt. Before this update,
the same file was used, which caused retries to fail trying to create
the same l
rdblue closed pull request #46: Do not scan manifests with no deletes when
expiring snapshots.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/46
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenanc
vinooganesh commented on issue #23: DataFile External Identifier Field
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/issues/23#issuecomment-446758457
Hey @rdblue - quickly jumping in here. I think the mentality is that a file
path as the sole identifier of a file may not suffice for ev
rdblue commented on issue #23: DataFile External Identifier Field
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/issues/23#issuecomment-446766094
@vinooganesh, I don't really understand the use case. How would you use the
identifier?
-
rdblue opened a new pull request #49: Fix type handling in Spark and Pig.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/49
This copies Pig type handling from Spark and fixes a minor bug in Spark with
integer logical types that have been promoted to longs.
--
groodt commented on issue #46: Do not scan manifests with no deletes when
expiring snapshots.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/46#issuecomment-446770708
I'm sorry. I really don't wish to be annoying, but I'm getting spammed by
something called GitBox f
rdblue commented on issue #46: Do not scan manifests with no deletes when
expiring snapshots.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/46#issuecomment-446775717
@groodt, I think we've requested for gitbox notifications to stop going to
the dev list, but I'll che
rdblue commented on issue #46: Do not scan manifests with no deletes when
expiring snapshots.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/46#issuecomment-446781096
Looks like we had not requested it yet, we had asked a question about it.
I've submitted the request: https://issues
rdblue opened a new pull request #50: Use manifest lists by default and fix
tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/50
This also fixes tests that were picking up manifest list files because they
validated manifests in the metadata directory by looking for all Avro file
danielcweeks commented on issue #49: Fix type handling in Spark and Pig.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/49#issuecomment-447036149
+1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond t
rdblue closed pull request #49: Fix type handling in Spark and Pig.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/49
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign pul
vinooganesh commented on issue #23: DataFile External Identifier Field
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/issues/23#issuecomment-447057968
So I see 2 uses for this:
(1) Identifier shared across files - let's say that I have a bunch of files
that make up a RDD that come fro
rdblue opened a new pull request #51: Use manifest lists by default.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/51
This also fixes tests that were broken by defaulting to manifest lists
because they assumed that the only avro files in the metadata directory were
manifests.
rdblue commented on issue #50: Use manifest lists by default and fix tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/50#issuecomment-447117765
Accidentally duplicated this one in #51. Closing.
This is an automated
rdblue commented on issue #51: Use manifest lists by default.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/51#issuecomment-447117967
Test failures are because #48 is missing.
This is an automated message from the Apac
rdblue closed pull request #50: Use manifest lists by default and fix tests.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/50
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a fo
danielcweeks commented on issue #48: Fix commit retry with manfiest lists.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/48#issuecomment-447118392
+1
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
rdblue closed pull request #48: Fix commit retry with manfiest lists.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/48
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign p
rdblue commented on issue #28: Apply baseline checkstyle for iceberg-api only
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/28#issuecomment-447124528
I think we should get this in, but I'd like to try to do it when we move
from com.netflix packages to org.apache. That is going to to
mccheah opened a new pull request #52: Use the FileIO submodule in Spark
writers and readers.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/52
Tricky because the table operations needs to be exposed. Added a mixed
interface of Table + TableOperations accordingly. Therefore now the
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #52: Use the FileIO submodule in
Spark writers and readers.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/52#discussion_r241580782
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
##
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #52: Use the FileIO submodule in
Spark writers and readers.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/52#discussion_r241587801
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
##
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #52: Use the FileIO submodule in
Spark writers and readers.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/52#discussion_r241604276
##
File path:
spark/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/spark/source/IcebergSource.java
##
mccheah commented on a change in pull request #52: Use the FileIO submodule in
Spark writers and readers.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-iceberg/pull/52#discussion_r241606297
##
File path: api/src/main/java/com/netflix/iceberg/Table.java
##
@@ -171,4 +172,10 @@ d
samredai opened a new pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1
This is the hugo docs-site shared on the dev mailing list and in
[apache/iceberg/issues/3616](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/3616). It
includes a github workflow that builds and pushes the s
samredai commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986105830
@rdblue @jackye1995 @kbendick @ajantha-bhat @RussellSpitzer @
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
samredai edited a comment on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986105830
@rdblue @jackye1995 @kbendick @ajantha-bhat @RussellSpitzer
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitH
jackye1995 commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986153886
There are over 3600 files, what are the important files to look into?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
rdblue commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986315139
Yeah, could you break this into smaller commits that we can look at? Why is
this almost 3,700 files?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to t
samredai commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986319585
Ah, my bad that's from two things:
- Didn't realize I included all of the javadocs, (which accounts for 3,310
files)
- I included the theme repo in this actual repo but
rdblue commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986321968
Makes sense! Let's remove whatever we can and then follow up with Javadocs
in a separate commit for each version once we have the basics. That should let
us review it much more ea
samredai commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-986415495
Updated to not include the javadocs and also to include the theme as a
submodule. An overview of the important directories/files.
- `content/docs` directory includes all o
jackye1995 commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r762692930
##
File path: .github/workflows/deploy.yml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+name: github pages
+
+on: [push, pull_request]
+
+jobs:
+ deploy:
+runs-on: ubuntu-
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763192839
##
File path: README.md
##
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
-## Iceberg Docs
+# Apache Iceberg Documentation Site
-This repository contains the markdown documentation hos
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763195072
##
File path: asciinema/schema_evolution.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+from generate_asciinema_cast import Cast
+
+sequence = [
+(
+"ALTER TABLE taxis
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763195862
##
File path: config.toml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+baseURL = "" # This is populated by the github deploy workflow and is equal
to "/"
+languageCode = "en-us"
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763196285
##
File path: content/about/about.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+Title: What is Iceberg?
+Draft: false
+---
+
+Iceberg adds tables to compute engines including
samredai commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763652648
##
File path: .github/workflows/deploy.yml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+name: github pages
+
+on: [push, pull_request]
+
+jobs:
+ deploy:
+runs-on: ubuntu-20
samredai commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763652888
##
File path: README.md
##
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
-## Iceberg Docs
+# Apache Iceberg Documentation Site
-This repository contains the markdown documentation h
samredai commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763656608
##
File path: config.toml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+baseURL = "" # This is populated by the github deploy workflow and is equal
to "/"
+languageCode = "en-us
samredai commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763658510
##
File path: config.toml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+baseURL = "" # This is populated by the github deploy workflow and is equal
to "/"
+languageCode = "en-us
samredai commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r763658651
##
File path: content/about/about.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+---
+Title: What is Iceberg?
+Draft: false
+---
+
+Iceberg adds tables to compute engines includi
samredai commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-987600519
> It looks like the Apache 2.0 license header is missing for some README and
script files, please check and add, thanks!
>
> For Python script, it seems like indentation i
kbendick commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-987616428
> Thinking about this now, we could probably get rid of the main branch here
and set next as the default branch for the repo, or alternatively we can have
some "if main then nex
jackye1995 commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-988424006
How are we going to move forward with this PR? If we move to the `next`
branch, is this PR for the `main` branch still needed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apach
samredai commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-989259177
> How are we going to move forward with this PR? If we move to the `next`
branch, is this PR for the `main` branch still needed?
If a `next` branch is created I can re-ope
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r765314353
##
File path: config.toml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+baseURL = "" # This is populated by the github deploy workflow and is equal
to "/"
+languageCode = "en-us"
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r765318054
##
File path: config.toml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+baseURL = "" # This is populated by the github deploy workflow and is equal
to "/"
+languageCode = "en-us"
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#discussion_r765318518
##
File path: content/docs/_index.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
+---
+title: Introduction
+type: docs
+---
+
+
+
+
+**Apache Ice
rdblue commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-989309666
It looks like this isn't quite ready to merge. Most of the text links on
pages are broken and the nav menu is really huge. Nav links go to paths like
`/spark-ddl/` but I think we
rdblue commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-989311369
For the conversation about a `next` branch:
* I don't see much value in having docs for the upcoming release. Maybe it's
just me, but I'd not prioritize this very highly.
* I
jackye1995 commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-989319785
> I'd focus on getting just 0.12.1 done. We can add more versions later
Yeah I was just gonna ask about that, I thought we are going to first create
those doc branches f
rdblue commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-989323751
Yeah, that sounds reasonable to me. I still question whether we even want to
have `next`. In any case, there's still a lot of work to do here to make sure
we have everything the w
jackye1995 commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-989324679
yes, `next` is really good-to-have stuff, I saw it in a few other Apache
websites that's why I brought it up, but if it's too much effort for community
to maintain then we can
samredai opened a new pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2
This addresses 3 main issues raised in #1.
- Broken Links
- All links have been fixed and verified with
https://github.com/filiph/linkcheck
- Split the landing page and the docs site wit
samredai commented on pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-992183368
Closing this and continuing in #2
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
samredai closed pull request #1:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
rdblue commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994162460
Here are a few notes from clicking around:
* Is the final path going to be `iceberg.apache.org/iceberg-docs`? Why not
make the landing page at the root level?
* In the previe
rdblue edited a comment on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994162460
Here are a few notes from clicking around:
* Is the final path going to be `iceberg.apache.org/iceberg-docs`? Why not
make the landing page at the root level?
* In the
rdblue edited a comment on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994162460
Here are a few notes from clicking around:
* Is the final path going to be `iceberg.apache.org/iceberg-docs`? Why not
make the landing page at the root level?
* In the
rdblue edited a comment on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994162460
Here are a few notes from clicking around:
* Is the final path going to be `iceberg.apache.org/iceberg-docs`? Why not
make the landing page at the root level?
* In the
rdblue edited a comment on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994162460
Here are a few notes from clicking around:
* Is the final path going to be `iceberg.apache.org/iceberg-docs`? Why not
make the landing page at the root level?
* In the
rdblue edited a comment on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994162460
Here are a few notes from clicking around:
* Is the final path going to be `iceberg.apache.org/iceberg-docs`? Why not
make the landing page at the root level?
* In the
jackye1995 commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-994422440
Also tried the website, thanks for continuing the work!
It seems like some links are still broken as Ryan points out. I have some
additional nitpicking:
1. Github
samredai commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-997086542
Thanks for all the feedback! Here's an updated demo site to show all the
fixes: https://iceberg.redai.dev/
@rdblue
Is the final path going to be iceberg.apache.org/ice
samredai edited a comment on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-997086542
Thanks for all the feedback! Here's an updated demo site to show all the
fixes: https://iceberg.redai.dev/
@rdblue
Is the final path going to be iceberg.apache.
rdblue commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-997489501
Thanks, @samredai! The site looks much better.
Before, we talked about having some pages that are not versioned and have
just one copy throughout. Things like the Releases p
samredai commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-998133549
Done! Here's what I came up with:
- Moved all of the common pages to `docs/commons`. This includes the
Community, Releases, and Format sections but let me know if there's any
jackye1995 commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-998987824
@rdblue yes I totally agree we can move forward and make incremental
progress on this, that also makes the review much easier with more specific
changes to look at.
--
This
kbendick commented on a change in pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#discussion_r773448184
##
File path: .github/workflows/deploy.yml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+name: github pages
+
+on: [push, pull_request]
+
+jobs:
+ deploy-landing-page:
+if: g
rdblue commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-999187098
@samredai, if I understand the workflow correctly, it sounds like you're
making extra copies of the common pages, one in each set of docs?
I think that still has a problem b
samredai commented on pull request #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/2#issuecomment-999728798
@rdblue Yes you're understanding is correct. That's a good point, updating
the common pages would still require redeploying the previous sites (even
though the same document is
samredai opened a new pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3
This adds an .asf.yaml file with notification settings to send commit
notifications to comm...@iceberg.apache.org and issue/pr notifications to
iss...@iceberg.apache.org.
--
This is an automated me
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3#discussion_r777680979
##
File path: .asf.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. See
rdblue commented on a change in pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3#discussion_r777681084
##
File path: .asf.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. See
samredai commented on a change in pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3#discussion_r17386
##
File path: .asf.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. S
samredai commented on a change in pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3#discussion_r17576
##
File path: .asf.yaml
##
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more contributor license agreements. S
rdblue commented on pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3#issuecomment-1004398533
I merged this using the CLI since I didn't see that I could squash and merge
in the dropdown. We'll have to figure out how to remove merge commits as an
option.
Thanks, @s
samredai closed pull request #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/3
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo