kbendick commented on pull request #1: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/1#issuecomment-987616428
> Thinking about this now, we could probably get rid of the main branch here and set next as the default branch for the repo, or alternatively we can have some "if main then next" logic in a couple of places. I would be in favor of changing the "main" branch name to `next` or whatever we use for latest snapshot. Having the logical symmetry between the branch names for the versions and the branch name for `next` seems worth it to me (like actively maintained tags). If doing so provides context AND potentially reduces the need for defensive coding checks at all, I'm all for it. The easier the docs are to work with, the better they'll be. We can always revert if we don't care for it, but it's probably better to start earlier than well after the fact. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
