Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #2

t; > Out of the votes 4 are binding: > > > > * Kurt Young > > * Piotr Nowojski > > * Yu Li > > * Zhu Zhu > > > > Best, > > Dawid > > > > On 02/03/2021 21:17, Henry Saputra wrote: > > > Roman, binding Votes only come from Apache F

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release 1.12.2, release candidate #2

Roman, binding Votes only come from Apache Flink PMC members. >From the list you had seems like only 3 binding Votes, right? On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 7:08 AM Roman Khachatryan wrote: > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > There are 7 approving votes, 5 of whic

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-166: Flink/Pinot Connector

I think this is good contribution to Apache Bahir: https://github.com/apache/bahir-flink as proper place to additional Flink connectors. - Henry On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 11:35 AM Yupeng Fu wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose a Flink/Pinot connector to solve the problems of > streaming/batch

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting User support mailing list

-1 for splitting user list to areas in Flink. As Robert and others have chimed in, we could have separate user list for sub projects in Flink, like statefun - Henry On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 11:27 AM Roman Khachatryan wrote: > Thanks Robert, > > That's a good idea, let's revisit it later. > > Regar

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-165: Operator's Flame Graphs

Hi Alexander, I had to moderate and accept your email to dev@ list. Could you subscribe to dev@ list for Apache Flink [1] to continue getting updates from your discussion thread? Thanks, Henry [1] https://flink.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:42 PM Alexander Fe

Re: MODERATE for dev@flink.apache.org

Hi, Looks like you have not subscribe to Apache Flink dev@ mailing list. Please subscribe by following instruction here to continue with the discussions and receive followups: https://flink.apache.org/community.html#mailing-lists Thanks, Henry Saputra On behalf of Apache Flink PMC

Re: MODERATE for dev@flink.apache.org

Hi, Looks like you are trying to send email to Apache Flink dev@ mailing list without subscribing yet. Please subscribe to the dev mailing list [1] to be able to see the reply and follow up with your question. Thanks, Henry On behalf of Apache Flink PMC [1] https://flink.apache.org/community.h

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Yu Li became a Flink committer

Belated congrats to Yu Li - Henry On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:59 AM Stephan Ewen wrote: > Hi all! > > We are announcing that Yu Li has joined the rank of Flink committers. > > Yu joined already in late December, but the announcement got lost because > of the Christmas and New Years season, so he

Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws

> > this "soft rule" is enough. Whenever possible, working based on trust > with > > soft processes beats working with hard processes. We can still revisit > this > > in case we see that it does not work out. > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at

Re: [VOTE] Flink Project Bylaws

One of the perks of being committers is be able to commit code without asking from another committer. Having said that, I think we rely on maturity of the committers to know when to ask for reviews and when to commit directly. For example, if someone just change typos on comments or simple rename

Re: [Discussion] Flink Pulsar Connector

Here is the link to Apache Flink JIRA issue for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9168 - Henry On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hi Flinkers, > > As discussed with @tzulitai at apache/flink#5845 > , I am starting a d

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.3.3, release candidate #2

Signature file looks good Hash files look good LICENSE file exists NOTICE file exists Source artifact build and local tests passed +1 On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Please review and vote on release candidate #2 for Flink 1.3.3, as > follows: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Flink PMC member: Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai

Welcome and congrats! On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:24 AM Fabian Hueske wrote: > Congrats Gordon! > > Cheers, Fabian > > 2017-07-10 17:03 GMT+02:00 jincheng sun : > > > Hi Gordon, Congratulations !!! > > > > Cheers, > > Jincheng > > > > 2017-07-10 22:44 GMT+08:00 Robert Metzger : > > > > > Hi Everyb

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Flink committer Shaoxuan Wang

Congrats and welcome! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 8:26 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > Congrats Shaoxuan :-) > > Cheers, > Till > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Shaoxuan Wang > wrote: > > > Thanks everyone. > > I will do my best, and let's keep Flink forwarding! > > > > Regards, > > Shaoxuan > > > >

Re: FlinkML on slack

Great news, Theodore +1 =) On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Theodore Vasiloudis < theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > We've created an app to automate the invite process, now you can just use > the following link > to get an invite to the FlinkML Slack group: > > https://flin

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Dawid Wysakowicz

Congrats and welcome! =) - Henry On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:55 PM, SHI Xiaogang wrote: > Congrats Dawid. > Great thanks for your contribution! > > Xiaogang > > 2017-06-19 18:52 GMT+08:00 Dawid Wysakowicz : > > > Thank you all for the warm welcome. I will do my best to be as helpful as > > possi

Re: FlinkML on slack

Hi Stavros, Could you also send me invite to the Slack? My email is hsapu...@apache.org Thanks, Henry On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Stavros Kontopoulos < st.kontopou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Aljoscha, > > Slack is invite only to the best of my knowledge, I just sent you an > invitation. >

Re: Official Flink Docker images

We already have a Dockerfile in our source repo as part of simple test: https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-contrib/docker-flink but it was never automatically build by our build system AFAIK. - Henry On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > How hard would it be

Re: [DISCUSS] Feature Freeze

The FLINK-6364 seems need an accompanying FLIP [1] to help review. I dont see for this one in the list of existing proposals. - Henry [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:39

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.1 (RC2)

>> >>> spending > >> >>>> much time online these days. I hope to increase my dev@ list > >> activity a > >> >>>> little bit next week. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> @Aljoscha: > >> >>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Code style / checkstyle

; >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 6 Mar 2017, at 12:42, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> A singular "all reformat in one instant" will cause immense damage > to the > >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.1 (RC2)

LICENSE file exists NOTICE file looks good Signature files look good Hash files look good No 3rd party exes in source artifact Source compiled and pass tests Local run work Run simple job on YARN +1 - Henry On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 4:06 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > Dear Flink community, > > Plea

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.2.1 (RC2)

This should be the one: https://github.com/aljoscha/FliRTT On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Ted Yu wrote: > Till: > A bit curious: where can I find the Flirrt tool ? > > Thanks > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Till Rohrmann > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) for the release > > > > - checked check

Re: [DISCUSS] Code style / checkstyle

lly through > > all > > > > past commits until you find the commit which changed a given line > > before > > > > the reformatting. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Till > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2

Re: [DISCUSS] Code style / checkstyle

Just want to clarify what unify code style here. Is the intention to have IDE and Maven plugins to have the same check style rules? Or are we talking about having ONE code style for both Java and Scala? - Henry On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Greg Hogan wrote: > I agree wholeheartedly with U

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Stefan Richter as a new committer

Congrats and welcome! On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Great news! Welcome Stefan :-D > > > On February 10, 2017 at 11:36:14 PM, Aljoscha Krettek (aljos...@apache.org) > wrote: > > Welcome! :-) > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 at 16:10 Till Rohrmann wrote: > > > Great to hav

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Jark Wu and Kostas Kloudas as committers

Awesome! Congrats and Welcome, Jark and Kostas K. - Henry On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I'm very happy to announce that Jark Wu and Kostas Kloudas accepted the > invitation of the Flink PMC to become committers of the Apache Flink > project. > > Jark

Re: Travis CI

you'll have these build times. > > I contacted the Travis support to hear if there's anything we can do > regarding the time limit. > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > Building Flink from root now takes long time due to more and mor

Re: Travis CI

Building Flink from root now takes long time due to more and more modules that we have =( For me if takes about 50 minutes or more when doing "mvn clean install -DskipTests" Should we start adding Maven profiles to help exclude some Maven modules, like connectors and flink-libraries by default ?

Re: [DISCUSS] Proposal for Asynchronous I/O in FLINK

HI David, Thanks so much for the interest to contribute to Apache Flink. To help review and DISCUSS for new feature in Flink, please do submit FLIP [1] proposal. It will help the PMCs managing the new feature proposals and keep resources with ASF realm. Thanks, Henry [1] https://cwiki.apache

Re: Posting Flink Cluster questions

HI, Please send email to dev-subscr...@flink.apache.org and follow the instructions from the auto reply to subscribe to Apache Flink dev@ list to participate in the discussions. Thanks, Henry On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 2:25 PM, amir bahmanyari wrote: > > Hi, > Whats the link to post a FlinkClust

Re: Reducing the JIRA PR message verbosity

Sorry for late reply, but +1 too This should still provide tracking of discussion from Github PR and reduce the noise at the same time. Thanks for working on it, Max. - Henry On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Fabian Hueske wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.1.1 (RC1)

Official vote +1 (binding) On Tuesday, August 9, 2016, Gyula Fóra wrote: > +1 from me, this is a very important fix. > > Gyula > > Vasiliki Kalavri > ezt írta > (időpont: 2016. aug. > 9., K, 19:15): > > > On 9 August 2016 at 18:27, Ufuk Celebi > > wrote: > > > > > Dear Flink community, > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.1.1 (RC1)

Yes, We can do this with reduced time for VOTE On Tuesday, August 9, 2016, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > PS: Let me add that no changes other than the release 1.1.1 commit > have been added on top of what we had in 1.1.0. > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Ufuk Celebi > > wrote: > > Dear Flink community

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Flink 1.1.0 Released

Great work all. Great Thanks to Ufuk as RE :) On Monday, August 8, 2016, Stephan Ewen wrote: > Great work indeed, and big thanks, Ufuk! > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:55 PM, Vasiliki Kalavri < > vasilikikala...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > yoo-hoo finally announced 🎉 > > Thanks for managing the rele

Re: Introduction

Welcome! :) On Sunday, July 31, 2016, Neelesh Salian wrote: > Hello folks, > > I am Neelesh Salian; I recently joined the Flink community and I wanted to > take this opportunity to formally introduce myself. > > I have been working with the Hadoop and Spark ecosystems over the past two > years a

Re: [DISCUSS] Putting Flink user names / logos on the homepage

With lots of discussion about branding issues with Apahe projects, eg Apache Spark, I would recommend us to move cautiously. We need to make sure companies listed in the homepage do not represent contributions or control over Apche Flink project. We got some concerns about our Shepard initiative

Re: [DISCUSS] Putting Flink user names / logos on the homepage

Good discussion and I think we could bring this to dev list instead. One reminder we should reduce cross posting to private& and dev@ lists to avoid accidental exposure to internal PMC business. - Henry On Monday, July 4, 2016, Stephan Ewen wrote: > Hi all! > > I was wondering if we want to pu

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.0

t the moment :) Those are a) > refactoring of the command-line and client classes b) adding > capability to resume cluster programmatically. > > Then we should also have a look at any other critical/major bugs listed in > JIRA. > > Cheers, > Max > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:

Re: [DISCUSS] Releasing Flink 1.1.0

Hi Robert, Thanks for staying the discussion. Do you know if there any open tasks for the Resource Manager left? That is probably needed for Mesos integration? - Henry On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > Hi, > > Flink 1.0.0 was released early March, so three months have

Re: [PROPOSAL] Structure the Flink Open Source Development

+1 for shepherd I would prefer using that term rather than maintainer. It is being used in Incubator PMC to help them keeping healthy development in podlings. The term "maintainer" kind of being scrutinized in ASF communities, in recent episodes happening in Spark community. - Henry On Wed, Jun

Re: Blogpost on Flink's SQL support

his PR and publish the post later today. > > Thanks, Fabian > > 2016-05-24 10:01 GMT+02:00 Kostas Tzoumas : > > > +1, great post > > > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Matthias J. Sax > wrote: > > > > > Will be a nice post! > > > >

Re: XGBoost on DataFlow and Flink

Hi Tianqi, I am also impressed with XGBoost and looking forward to having integration with Apache Flink. As for resource requirements, Apache Flink is using abstraction of slots to express parallel execution in the TaskManager [1] I suppose you were looking for some DSL or specification configur

Re: Blogpost on Flink's SQL support

I agree with Ufuk, that this is more internal posts which perfect for blog. For high level and use cases I think would be better to be added to Apache Flink release docs bc that is where most users will try to find info on how to use it. - Henry On Saturday, May 21, 2016, Ufuk Celebi wrote: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Secure Flink clusters

Eron, Could you please do also loop me in in the early discussions since we are interested on deploying Flink as standalone to access secure data via Kerberized access. I also was talking to Owen from HDFS at the Apache Big Data and there could be some work we can ask to be done in the Hadoop com

Re: [PROPOSAL] Structure the Flink Open Source Development

The maintainers concept is good idea to make sure PRs are moved smoothly. But, we need to make sure that this is not additional hierarchy on top of Flink PMCs. This will keep us in spirit of ASF community over code. Please do add me as cluster management maintainer member. - Henry On Tuesday, M

Re: Intellij code style

We could actually put this in the tools directory of the source and repo and refer it from contribution guide. @Dawid want to try to send Pull request for it? On Thursday, April 28, 2016, Theodore Vasiloudis < theodoros.vasilou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we plan to include something like this in

Re: Powered by Flink

Thanks, Slim. I have just updated the wiki page with this entries. On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Slim Baltagi wrote: > Hi > > The following are missing in the ‘Powered by Flink’ list: > >- *king.com * > > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/the_apache_software_

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-3690) Create documentation on the new ResourceManager component

Henry Saputra created FLINK-3690: Summary: Create documentation on the new ResourceManager component Key: FLINK-3690 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3690 Project: Flink

Re: Extending and improving our "How to contribute" page

; >> > > [ ] is there a jira supporting the PR > > >> > > > > >> > > Let me know what you think. The language/tone probably needs a bit > > of > > >> > > refinement. > > >> > > > > >> > > be

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Flink 0.10.2 Released

Yep, great work, Ufuk On Friday, February 12, 2016, Kostas Kloudas wrote: > Yes thanks a lot Ufuk! > > > On Feb 12, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Till Rohrmann > wrote: > > > > Thanks for being our release manager Ufuk :-) Great work! > > > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Robert Metzger > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Signature file on source looks good Hash files on source look good LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good Source compiled Tests passed Standalone works Test on YARN session works - Henry On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > Dear Flink community, > > Please

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)

blocker. I can manage my own build with this patch if > necessary. Just thought I might not be the only one running streaming on > yarn. > > On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Henry Saputra > wrote: > > > Hi Ufuk, > > > > This is nice to have but not a blocker. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.2 (RC2)

Hi Ufuk, This is nice to have but not a blocker. So unless we find blocker for the current RC I prefer to continue evaluate and VOTE current RC. - Henry On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > Hey Nick, > > I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on > YARN.

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Combinable Annotation from DataSet API

+1 for approach #1 - Henry On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Chiwan Park wrote: > I’m also for approach #1. Now is nice time to apply some API-breaking > changes. > > > On Jan 14, 2016, at 1:19 AM, Aljoscha Krettek > wrote: > > > > I’m also for Approach #1. I like simplifying things. > >> On

Re: Dripping the Flink-on-Tez code for Flink 1.0

+1 I am always for simplifying our code base when possible. On Sunday, January 10, 2016, Stephan Ewen wrote: > I was typing with fat fingers again. Meant "dropping code" of course, not > "dripping" ;-) > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Fabian Hueske > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > 2016-01-08 1

Re: Effort to add SQL / StreamSQL to Flink

design document in the next days. > > Thanks, Fabian > > 2016-01-10 2:45 GMT+01:00 Henry Saputra >: > > > HI Fabian, > > > > Have you created JIRA ticket to keep track of this new feature? > > > > - Henry > > > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 a

Re: Add CEP library to Flink

HI Till, Have you created JIRA ticket to keep track of this proposed new feature? We should create one to keep track updates on the effort. Thanks, Henry On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Till Rohrmann wrote: > Hi everybody, > > recently we've seen an increased interest in complex event process

Re: Effort to add SQL / StreamSQL to Flink

HI Fabian, Have you created JIRA ticket to keep track of this new feature? - Henry On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > Hi everybody, > > in the last days, Timo and I refined the design document for adding a SQL / > StreamSQL interface on top of Flink that was started by Steph

Re: Effort to add SQL / StreamSQL to Flink

I am excited and nervous at the same time =) - Henry On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 AM, Fabian Hueske wrote: > Hi everybody, > > in the last days, Timo and I refined the design document for adding a SQL / > StreamSQL interface on top of Flink that was started by Stephan. > > The document proposes a

2015: A Year in Review for Apache Flink

Dear All, It is almost end of 2015 and it has been busy and great year for Apache Flink =) Robert Metzger had posted great blog summarizing Apache Flink grow for this year: https://flink.apache.org/news/2015/12/18/a-year-in-review.html Happy New Year everyone and thanks for being part of this

Re: Externalizing the Flink connectors

breaking change. I also think that "connector" describes much better what >> the whole thing is about. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Maximilian Michels > wrote: >> >>> Yes, absolutely. Setting up another repository for Fl

Re: Externalizing the Flink connectors

I had small chat with Till about how to help manage Flink ML Libraries contributions, which use Flink ML as dependencies. I suppose if this approached is the way to go for Flink connectors, could we do the same for Flink ML libraries? - Henry On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Maximilian Michels

Re: Distributed DataFrame - ddf.io

Internally, DDF uses Flink Table APIs to process the SQL queries. I would say that DDF would be very useful to provide good virtualization when building application platform. - Henry On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Kostas Tzoumas wrote: > Hi Nam-Luc, > > I cc Rohit who implemented the DDF frame

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.1 (release-0.10.0-rc1)

+1 LICENSE file looks good in source artifact NOTICE file looks good in source artifact Signature file looks good in source artifact Hash files looks good in source artifact No 3rd party executables in source artifact Source compiled All tests are passed Run standalone mode test app - Henry On M

Re: could you please add me Contributor list?

Hi Jun, What is your JIRA username? But for now, you can always work on JIRA issue without assigning to yourself. Just add to comment that you are planning to work on it. - Henry On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:18 PM, jun aoki wrote: > So that I can assign myself to Flink jiras? > > -- > -jun

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc8)

Awesome news! Thanks a lot for driving the release, Max! =) On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:59 PM, fhueske wrote: > Thanks Max! :-) > > > Von: Maximilian Michels > Gesendet: Freitag, 13. November 2015 00:02 > An: dev@flink.apache.org > Betreff: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc8)

LICENSE file looks good NOTICE file looks good Hash files looks good for source artifact Signature file checked for source artifact No third party executable in source artifact Source compiled Tests passed Run Word Count with local and Apache Hadoop YARN 2.6.0 in session mode. +1 On Tue, Nov 10,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 (release-0.10.0-rc4)

+1 to remove binary LICENSE/NOTICE It should be ok since Apache officially just do source release. Binary release is just for convenience. Lets keep reducing complexity on releases. - Henry On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > +1 for the approach without the full LICENSE/NOTI

Re: Broken link for master Javadocs

minute or so runtime but leaves us unaware of JavaDoc > related problems. I recently changed that in 0845529. > > Cheers, > Max > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: >> Hi Max, >> >> Thanks for this. Is it issue from Flink side? The Javadoc

Re: Broken link for master Javadocs

Hi Max, Thanks for this. Is it issue from Flink side? The Javadoc always built in my local env. - Henry On Wednesday, October 28, 2015, Maximilian Michels wrote: > The issue with our Java Docs has been resolved. The link works again. > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Henry Saputra

Re: Broken link for master Javadocs

le > because sometimes the infrastructure is flaky and it fails for no > particular reason. > > Cheers, > Max > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Henry Saputra > wrote: > >> Hi Max, >> >> Is there a way that dev@ list gets email notification if the build fa

Re: Broken link for master Javadocs

^ > [ERROR] 8 errors found > > > Not sure what the issue is. I'll try to look into later. > > Thanks, > Max > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Henry Saputra > > wrote: > > > Thanks for the heads up, Suneel. > > > > Seemed like m

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing a review process for pull requests

I don't think it is > necessary that a committer explicitly sign-up as a shepherd of her/his own > PR. > > Cheers, Fabian > > > 2015-10-24 20:48 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra >: > > > Yes, as committer we trust you to do the right thing when committing the > > co

Re: Broken link for master Javadocs

Thanks for the heads up, Suneel. Seemed like master Java api (api/java/index.html) is not being built: https://ci.apache.org/projects/ I have filed ticket with infra to help figure out why. - Henry On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Suneel Marthi wrote: > https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/fli

Re: [DISCUSS] Introducing a review process for pull requests

Yes, as committer we trust you to do the right thing when committing the code. If a committer believe he/ she needs review,especially with large patch, then he/ she should send PR for review. - Henry On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 3:53 AM, Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Great work! > > What puzzles me a lit

Re: [DISCUSS] Java code style

with > adding all the checkstyle rules one module at a time (with a jira > issue to keep track of the modules already converted). It's not going > to happen that we lazily add comments because that's the reason why > comments are missing in the first place... > > On Fri

Re: [DISCUSS] Java code style

t;> >>>>> Thanks Max for checking the modifications by the Google code >> > > style. >> > > >> >>>>> It is very good to know, that the impact on the code base >> would >> > > not >> > > >> be >> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Java code style

1) yes. Been dancing this issue for a while. Let's pull the trigger. Did the exercise with Tachyon while back and did help readability and homogeneity of code. 2) +1 for Google Java style with documented exceptions and explanation on why. On Tuesday, October 20, 2015, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > DISCL

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2872) Update the documentation for Scala part to add readFileOfPrimitives

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2872: Summary: Update the documentation for Scala part to add readFileOfPrimitives Key: FLINK-2872 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2872 Project: Flink

Re: [URGENT] Documentation is broken for Dataset API programming guide

gain soon when the documentation was > built and published on the CI servers. > > Thanks, Fabian > > 2015-10-17 3:48 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra >: > > > Guys, > > > > Need help to figure out what went wrong with the Dataset API programming > > guide. >

[URGENT] Documentation is broken for Dataset API programming guide

Guys, Need help to figure out what went wrong with the Dataset API programming guide. Before: https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-0.9/apis/programming_guide.html Current: https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/apis/programming_guide.html Missing lots of secti

Re: Flaky ScalaShellLocalStartupITCase

HI Sachin, Let's file ticket for it so we could try to address it. These flaky tests could cause confusion for contributors. Thanks, - Henry On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:14 AM, Sachin Goel wrote: > Hi all > Over the past few days, I've observed multiple failures of this test case. > There is no

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2847) Fix flaky test in StormTestBase.testJob

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2847: Summary: Fix flaky test in StormTestBase.testJob Key: FLINK-2847 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2847 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bug

Re: Extending and improving our "How to contribute" page

; >>>> >>> "design-doc-requested" label to the issue. A design document can > be > >>>> >>> proposed by anybody, including the reporter or assignee of the > JIRA > >>>> >> issue. > >>>> >>>

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2815) [REFACTOR] Remove Pact from class and file names since it is no longer valid reference

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2815: Summary: [REFACTOR] Remove Pact from class and file names since it is no longer valid reference Key: FLINK-2815 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2815

Re: Release Flink 0.10

t;> > >> > I'm voting for enabling the new one by default and keeping the old one >> for >> > the next release. >> > What do you think? >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Henry Saputra >> > wrote: >> >

Re: Pulling Streaming out of staging and project restructure

nternal package restructuring. I think, renaming the > >>>>> three modules in this commit would be a smart move as both changes > >>>>> result in merge conflicts when rebasing open PRs. Thus we can limit > >>> this > >>>>> pain to a single time. If

Re: Pulling Streaming out of staging and project restructure

+1 I like the idea moving "staging" projects into appropriate modules. While we are at it, I would like to propose changing " flink-hadoop-compatibility" to "flink-hadoop". It is in my bucket list but would be nice if it is part of re-org. Supporting Hadoop in the connector implicitly means compa

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2786) Remove Spargel from source code and update documentation in favor of Gelly

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2786: Summary: Remove Spargel from source code and update documentation in favor of Gelly Key: FLINK-2786 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2786 Project

Re: Release Flink 0.10

Oops, I meant Spargel [1] =) [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/libs/spargel_guide.html On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Henry Saputra wrote: > +1 to the idea. > > I also think we need to remove Pregel if Gelly wants to graduate. It already > depre

Re: Release Flink 0.10

+1 to the idea. I also think we need to remove Pregel if Gelly wants to graduate. It already deprecated in 0.9. - Henry On Tuesday, September 29, 2015, Kostas Tzoumas wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to propose to cancel the 0.10-milestone release and go > directly for a 0.10 release as

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2775) [CLEANUP] Cleanup code as part of theme to be more consistent on Utils classes

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2775: Summary: [CLEANUP] Cleanup code as part of theme to be more consistent on Utils classes Key: FLINK-2775 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2775 Project

Re: Extending and improving our "How to contribute" page

Thanks again, Fabian for starting the discussions. For (1) and (2) I think it is good idea and will help people to understand and follow the author thought process. Following up with Stephan's reply, some new features solutions could be explained thoroughly in the PR descriptions but some requires

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2650) Fix broken link in the Table API doc

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2650: Summary: Fix broken link in the Table API doc Key: FLINK-2650 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2650 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bug

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release current master as 0.9.1 (mod few changes)

I am +1 for this idea. - Henry On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > I'm against using the current master for 0.9.1. > It contains too many changes, posing the risk of changing APIs/semantics/... > I agree with Max that there was no consensus or discussion regarding the > sco

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-2574) Remove Spargel from master in next release

Henry Saputra created FLINK-2574: Summary: Remove Spargel from master in next release Key: FLINK-2574 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2574 Project: Flink Issue Type: Task

Re: Gelly Blog Post

Awesome +1 - Henry On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote: > Blog post is live: > http://flink.apache.org/news/2015/08/24/introducing-flink-gelly.html > > Feel free to spread the word. :) > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Ufuk Celebi > wrote: > >> Andra just opened a PR for the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Please add more Description and information to JIRA issues

tand the issue. >> >> Thanks, >> Fabian >> >> [1] http://flink.apache.org/coding-guidelines.html >> >> 2015-08-16 10:35 GMT+02:00 Henry Saputra : >> >> > Hi All, >> > >> > Apology for the cross-posting. >> > >&g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer Chesnay Schepler

Welcome Chesnay! On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Flink has asked Chesnay > Schepler to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they > have accepted. > > Chesnay has been very involved with the Flink project

  1   2   3   >