Hi Nick, Thanks for bringing up the issue. I believe some people (including me) will try to run Apache Flink on YARN =)
If more 0.10.x releases needed before 1.0 definitely would love to include this in. - Henry On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agree it's not a blocker. I can manage my own build with this patch if > necessary. Just thought I might not be the only one running streaming on > yarn. > > On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Ufuk, > > > > This is nice to have but not a blocker. > > > > So unless we find blocker for the current RC I prefer to continue > evaluate > > and VOTE current RC. > > > > - Henry > > > > On Tuesday, February 9, 2016, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Hey Nick, > > > > > > I agree that this can be problematic when running multiple jobs on > > > YARN. Since there is a chance that this might be the last release 0.10 > > > release, I would be OK to cancel the vote for your fix. > > > > > > Still, let's hear the opinion of others before doing this. What do you > > > think? > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org > > <javascript:;> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > Perhaps too late for the RC, but I've backported FLINK-3293 to this > > > branch > > > > via FLINK-3372. Would be nice for those wanting to monitory yarn > > > > application submissions. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org > > <javascript:;> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Dear Flink community, > > > >> > > > >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink > > version > > > >> 0.10.2. > > > >> > > > >> Please note that this vote has a slightly shorter voting period of > 48 > > > >> hours. Only a single change has been made since the last release > > > >> candidate. Since the community has already done extensive testing of > > the > > > >> previous release candidate, I'm assuming 48 hours will suffice to > vote > > > on > > > >> this one. > > > >> > > > >> The commit to be voted on: > > > >> e525eb2f1413df238e994d01c909d2b90f1b7709 > > > >> > > > >> Branch: > > > >> release-0.10.2-rc2 (see > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-0.10.2-rc2 > > > >> ) > > > >> > > > >> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: > > > >> http://people.apache.org/~uce/flink-0.10.2-rc2/ > > > >> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint > > 9D403309: > > > >> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS > > > >> > > > >> The staging repository for this release can be found at: > > > >> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1061 > > > >> > > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> > > > >> The vote is open for the next 48 hours and passes if a majority of > at > > > least > > > >> three +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > >> > > > >> The vote ends on Wednesday February 10, 2016, 18:45 CET. > > > >> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 0.10.2 > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... > > > >> > > > >> =================================== > > > >> > > > >> The following commits have been added since the 0.10.2 RC 1: > > > >> > > > >> * 2cd0618 - [tools] Properly update all POM versions in release > script > > > >> (3 hours ago) <Ufuk Celebi> > > > >> > > > > > >
