-1 for splitting user list to areas in Flink. As Robert and others have chimed in, we could have separate user list for sub projects in Flink, like statefun
- Henry On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, 11:27 AM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Robert, > > That's a good idea, let's revisit it later. > > Regards, > Roman > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:40 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Thanks a lot for bringing up this idea Roman! > > > > After reading the initial proposal, I quite liked the idea, because it > > makes our life easier: We can only monitor lists relevant for the topics > we > > are working on (I have to admit that I usually skip all questions that > seem > > to be related to SQL or Statefun). > > There are a few Apache projects which have followed a similar approach > [1], > > most notable maybe the Hadoop project, which has a user@, as well as > > hdfs-user@, mapreduce-user@, ozone-user@ etc. There, it seems that > > sub-projects have separate lists. This would support the idea of > splitting > > out statefun into a separate list. > > > > But the majority of people who have commented so far seem to have > concerns > > regarding the proposal, which seem reasonable. > > I propose to revisit this proposal at a later point. > > > > > > > > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ > > >
