Re: Squiggly Oddness

2015-05-27 Thread Harbs
FWIW, I solved my specific issue by using an index instead of a reference to the controller, and I always resolve the controller using flowComposer.getControllerAt(_flowIndex); As for the why: Squiggly replaces the standard ContainerController with a SquigglyCustomContainerController (which

Re: Squiggly Oddness

2015-05-27 Thread Alex Harui
I haven’t looked at the code at all, but maybe it would be worth trying to figure out “why” Squiggly replaces the controller. I would imagine it is to get certain events so it knows when to run its spell checker and/or injecting the squiggly decoration. Having the controller dispatch the right

Re: Squiggly Oddness

2015-05-27 Thread Harbs
, Harbs wrote: > When loading Squiggly, it modifies the controllers in the FlowComposer and > swaps out the existing controllers with SquigglyCustomContainerControllers. > > This is problematic: > 1) There’s no way to track ContainerControllers while using Squiggly.

Squiggly Oddness

2015-05-27 Thread Harbs
When loading Squiggly, it modifies the controllers in the FlowComposer and swaps out the existing controllers with SquigglyCustomContainerControllers. This is problematic: 1) There’s no way to track ContainerControllers while using Squiggly. Any tracked ContainerControllers become unused. (I

Re: Apache Squiggly Instructions

2015-04-19 Thread jude
OK. Thanks. I've created a page here <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Apache+Squiggly> and added the necessary disclaimers. I'll made some changes to the original SpellUIForTLF class files and try to add a few updates here and there. I may have some patch files or

Re: Does Squiggly support Hebrew?

2015-04-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > On the Adobe Squiggly page it says vertical and rtl text is not supported > in this current release (which release?), "Vertical text and right-to-left > (RTL) text flow is not supported in the current release of Squiggly. > (2872937, 2872937)". Does anyone know if thi

Re: Apache Squiggly Instructions

2015-04-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > What would be better is if we can copy and paste that page > onto our wiki and then link to that. I was going to say that unless Adobe donated the content we would be unable to do that. But looking at the license at the bottom of the page it looks to be MIT licensed and as that is compati

Does Squiggly support Hebrew?

2015-04-19 Thread jude
On the Adobe Squiggly page it says vertical and rtl text is not supported in this current release (which release?), "Vertical text and right-to-left (RTL) text flow is not supported in the current release of Squiggly. (2872937, 2872937)". Does anyone know if this is outdated? Will

Apache Squiggly Instructions

2015-04-19 Thread jude
On the official Apache Squiggly page <http://flex.apache.org/download-squiggly.html> here, there doesn't seem to be any instructions on it's use. After I groked the interwebs I found a few tutorials and eventually the official Adobe Labs Squiggly <http://labs.adobe.com/te

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-12-22 Thread Alex Harui
What else has changed since 1.1? We have a couple of other things in the queue to be released next. I’m not that interested in Squiggly, so feel free to volunteer to be the RM yourself. It is probably good to have more folks experienced in being an RM. -Alex On 12/22/14, 8:46 AM, "Mihai

Re : Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-12-22 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi guys, I wasnt able to follow everythings about this thread but if you want to do another release of squiggly, do the maven one in the same time and publish the rsls too please, I modified the script accordingly so it should be easy --- Message initial --- De : "Mihai Chira" E

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-12-22 Thread Mihai Chira
Alex, could you please create the Squiggly 1.2 fix version? Thanks. On 22 December 2014 at 16:45, Mihai Chira wrote: > I've just updated README with this information. Do let me know if I > missed anything. > > On 26 October 2014 at 11:09, piotrz wrote: >> I know Justi

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-12-22 Thread Mihai Chira
are you saying that we shouldn't have in squiggly script checking for > PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME? > Some part of squiggly build need this path, for example target > "compileuitlf". > If we want to use approve script and check by them whether project is > building or not this part

Re: AW: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-23 Thread Alex Harui
be possible as the tests run quite >long, but I doubt we coudln't implement some sort of Whatchdog >functionality. > >Chris > > >Von: Alex Harui >Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. November 2014 05:44 >An: dev@flex.apache.org >Betre

AW: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-23 Thread Christofer Dutz
ctionality. Chris Von: Alex Harui Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. November 2014 05:44 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) As Just

Re: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-22 Thread Alex Harui
. -Alex On 11/22/14, 8:37 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >That seems a good idea, effectively, we've got what need for the sdk >because the mavenizer does the job to prepare it for maven with the >require directory structure, what about the others, flexunit, squiggly, &g

RE: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-22 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
That seems a good idea, effectively, we've got what need for the sdk because the mavenizer does the job to prepare it for maven with the require directory structure, what about the others, flexunit, squiggly, blazeds, etc... ? Also, for flexunit for example, I noticed the listener for AIR

AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-22 Thread Christofer Dutz
to-deploy the latest FDK once a night. What do you think about that? Chris Von: Frédéric THOMAS Gesendet: Samstag, 22. November 2014 16:22 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640

RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-22 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
extract the assembly an use the maven-bulk-deploy. Thoughts ? Frédéric THOMAS [1] http://bsorrentino.github.io/maven-bulk-deploy/deploy-folder-mojo.html > From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] >

AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-22 Thread Christofer Dutz
esendet: Freitag, 21. November 2014 18:51 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) On 11/21/14, 3:22 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> If you'r

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > That’s great, it is fine for folks to try again, but fundamentally, if the > strategy is still several projects sharing a Jenkins instance, then I > disagree with Infra's approach. Perhaps we should start a conversation with them about that, I'm sure something can be worked out. Thanks, J

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/21/14, 3:22 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> If you're feeling brave, go ahead. Past experience with INFRA makes me >>wary >> to go down that rabbit hole again. > >They gave a few talks at ApacheCon, they now see themselves as a service >provider and are here to help and are in the pr

Re: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven

2014-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > In maven.xml, the next version is 1.1 ( value="1.1"/>), is it wise given 1.0-snapshot hasn't been released yet ? IMO Would be best to keep the version numbers in sync with the released version numbers. So yes that may mean we will never have a 1.0 squiggly in maven un

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > If you're feeling brave, go ahead. Past experience with INFRA makes me wary > to go down that rabbit hole again. They gave a few talks at ApacheCon, they now see themselves as a service provider and are here to help and are in the process of consolidating/fixing their offerings. We should

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Erik de Bruin
If you're feeling brave, go ahead. Past experience with INFRA makes me wary to go down that rabbit hole again. EdB On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > We’ve had so many problems with builds.a.o that I wouldn’t want to rely > on > > it for nightly builds > > Infr

RE: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
it if there is a way to do that in maven though :-) Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Subject: Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 20

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > We’ve had so many problems with builds.a.o that I wouldn’t want to rely on > it for nightly builds Infra have been doing work on build and we're told it now much better. Perhaps time to try again? Thanks, Justin

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > What is the process to release the next one, except a standard vote on RCs , > what about the Maven bits ? See this [1]. Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html

Re: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > B- Why a maven released versions (1.0 and 1.1) hasn't been publish yet ? With 1.0 not sure we got any feedback if it worked or not, with 1.1 the nexus was broken and we were unable to test it. I think the pom may still require some minor changes to work. If you want to give it a try go fo

AW: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-21 Thread Christofer Dutz
Alex Harui Gesendet: Freitag, 21. November 2014 02:54 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) But why couldn’t the builds.a.o script just grab artifacts from apacheflexbuilds

Re: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Alex Harui
he only >option. > >Other would be to manually deploy snapshots from a developer machine >whenever an update seems to be appropriate. > >Chris > > > > >Von: Frédéric THOMAS >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 18:58

AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
2014 18:58 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) @Alex, Thanks for remembering me. > So, IMO, we don’t want to have builds.a.o try to run scripts that do GUI > test

RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
@Alex, Thanks for remembering me. > So, IMO, we don’t want to have builds.a.o try to run scripts that do GUI > tests, but even Squiggly really should have GUI tests some day. Is it > possible that the “build” that runs on builds.a.o does not compile source > code or runs tests, but i

Re: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 11/20/14, 9:39 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Ok, I understood better now :) >> That being said ... for which part should I setup a job? >Well, I would say for squiggly and flexunit (this last one has not even a >snapshot yet) but also for all of those projects

RE: AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Ok, I understood better now :) > That being said ... for which part should I setup a job? Well, I would say for squiggly and flexunit (this last one has not even a snapshot yet) but also for all of those projects which generate artifacts / poms (except those built by the last FM as it won&#

Re: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Alex Harui
hine. So, IMO, we don’t want to have builds.a.o try to run scripts that do GUI tests, but even Squiggly really should have GUI tests some day. Is it possible that the “build” that runs on builds.a.o does not compile source code or runs tests, but instead grabs artifacts from apacheflexbuilds and p

AW: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
That being said ... for which part should I setup a job? Chris Von: Frédéric THOMAS Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2014 17:30 An: dev@flex.apache.org Betreff: RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate

RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
> I set up the builds for snapshots only Do you mean for squiggly ? I haven't see it, can you point me out where and how to access it pls ? > Sorry for being a little unresponsive today, but I'm still at the apachecon. Np, I hope it goes well :-) Frédéric THOMAS > From

AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
HOMAS" An: "dev@flex.apache.org" Betreff: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) Datum: Do., Nov. 20, 2014 17:50 > but I guess Chris is saying we pretty much have to > for building release

RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
> Subject: Re: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:58:52 + > > We probably should have a Jenkins build for Squiggly running on > apacheflexbuilds. > > W

RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
me. > I think a release should be deployed manually. Sure, me too, was thinking about automatize the SNAPSHOT deployment only and find a way to enhance the release process to include the Maven releases deployment as conveniently as possible, even though it would be ok for Squiggly, as Alex sa

Re: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Alex Harui
We probably should have a Jenkins build for Squiggly running on apacheflexbuilds. We’ve had so many problems with builds.a.o that I wouldn’t want to rely on it for nightly builds, but I guess Chris is saying we pretty much have to for building release candidates that deploy to Maven? Once we get

AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
HOMAS" An: "dev@flex.apache.org" Betreff: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) Datum: Do., Nov. 20, 2014 16:28 Hi Chris, > I think I finished the maven stuff shortly after the release Not s

AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
f you want. Chris Gesendet mit meinem HTC - Reply message - Von: "Frédéric THOMAS" An: "dev@flex.apache.org" Betreff: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) Datum: Do., Nov. 20, 2014 1

RE: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
> To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:42:27 + > > I think I finished the maven stuff shortly after the release, if

AW: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Christofer Dutz
I think I finished the maven stuff shortly after the release, if I'm not remembering it wrong. Chris Gesendet mit meinem HTC - Reply message - Von: "Frédéric THOMAS" An: "dev@flex.apache.org" Betreff: [Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Create

[Maven - Squiggly] release (was: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
I reverted the version as what it was before (1.1), I haven't seen we released it in a standard way with this version, now I wonder: A- Have we got the Jenkins build for Squiggly ?B- Why a maven released versions (1.0 and 1.1) hasn't been publish yet ? Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > F

RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven

2014-11-20 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Ok, just pushed it. Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs > and deploy with Maven > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:39:15 + > > @Alex, Thanks > @Chris, an

RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven

2014-11-18 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
@Alex, Thanks @Chris, any thoughts on that: In maven.xml, the next version is 1.1 (), is it wise given 1.0-snapshot hasn't been released yet ? Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Packa

Re: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven

2014-11-17 Thread Alex Harui
OK, added. On 11/17/14, 4:01 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: >Squiggly as Components is not set yet, I selected "Runtime Shared >Libraries".If someone as the Karma and the time to set "Squiggly" as >Components, I'll change it. > >Frédéric THOMAS

RE: [Installer] versions mismatch (was: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
# AIR version numberair.version = 14.0 Frédéric THOMAS From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: RE: [Installer] versions mismatch (was: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:10:12 + Anyway, I

RE: [Installer] versions mismatch (was: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Anyway, I don't think it is correct in build.xml: Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Installer] versions mismatch (was: [jira] [Created] > (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > Date: Mo

RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven

2014-11-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
ntil someone who have the knowledge and the time fix it, does it. I will commit in 72h with if no one can confirm or infirm it is better than 1.1 Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate

RE: [Installer] versions mismatch (was: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
LEX-34640) > Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven) > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 12:58:52 + > > Hi, > One moth ago or so, I used the Installer 3.1.0 to install flex-4.13-AIR-15, > today, I tried with Ant to build Squiggly against it, I ran into something > weird, when

[Installer] versions mismatch (was: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven)

2014-11-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi, One moth ago or so, I used the Installer 3.1.0 to install flex-4.13-AIR-15, today, I tried with Ant to build Squiggly against it, I ran into something weird, when it tried to compile libs like the Spelling Framework against the player global, I received this message [1] following the

RE: [jira] [Created] (FLEX-34640) Squiggly: Generate / Package RSLs and deploy with Maven

2014-11-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Squiggly as Components is not set yet, I selected "Runtime Shared Libraries".If someone as the Karma and the time to set "Squiggly" as Components, I'll change it. Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:59:33 + > From: j...@apache.org > To: iss..

Re: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-31 Thread Alex Harui
On 10/31/14, 1:08 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >> Does this mean that we now have squiggly in the public Apache Maven >>Release repository? > >I'm not sure if a vote is required to put it up there or not, given it >the same package that has been voted on

AW: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-31 Thread Christofer Dutz
Betreff: Re: Draft squiggly announcement Hi, Changing to dev list not sure why it defaulted to users. > Does this mean that we now have squiggly in the public Apache Maven Release > repository? No the repo was out of disk space when the vote was called - which I think has now been fixed. I

Re: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-31 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Changing to dev list not sure why it defaulted to users. > Does this mean that we now have squiggly in the public Apache Maven Release > repository? No the repo was out of disk space when the vote was called - which I think has now been fixed. I'm not sure if a vote is require

Re: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-30 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > This is why I have the 'Undo' button enabled in my gmail. It has saved me > so many times :-) Probably only helps for people that use gmail? Once sent you can't unsend an email. Justin

Re: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-30 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
This is why I have the 'Undo' button enabled in my gmail. It has saved me so many times :-) Thanks, Om On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache > Flex Squiggly 1.1 > > Apache Flex Squig

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Flex Squiggly 1.1

2014-10-30 Thread Justin Mclean
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex Squiggly 1.1 Apache Flex Squiggly is an ActionScript spell checking library for the Apache Flex SDK. We welcome feedback and contributions to it from the wider Apache Flex community. Squiggly 1.1 has the following

Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-30 Thread Justin Mclean
The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex Squiggly 1.1 Apache Flex Squiggly is an ActionScript spell checking library for the Apache Flex SDK. We welcome feedback and contributions to it from the wider Apache Flex community. Squiggly 1.1 has the following

Re: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I'm a bit busy but should be able to get to this within 24 hours. Unless someone does it first and updates the web sites download pages and footer. Thanks, Justin

[VOTE][RESULT] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, And the votes passes with 5 +1 binding votes and one non binding vote. Thanks to everyone who took the time to look at the package and vote. Justin

Re: Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-26 Thread OmPrakash Muppirala
A what's new section would be nice. Or at least a link to the release notes. Thanks, Om On Oct 26, 2014 3:44 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, > > Once the squiggly vote has passed and the dist mirrors have had time to > propagate this is what I'll send out.

Draft squiggly announcement

2014-10-26 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Once the squiggly vote has passed and the dist mirrors have had time to propagate this is what I'll send out. The Apache Flex community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Flex Squiggly 1.1 Apache Flex Squiggly is an ActionScript spell checking library for the Apache Flex SD

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-26 Thread piotrz
+1 binding Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.1/rc1/apache-flex-squiggly-1.1-bin.zip Java 1.8, Ant 1.9.3 OS: Windows 7 64bit Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y (I've checked build separatly without using ApproveSquiggly.xml script) README

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-10-26 Thread piotrz
I know Justin. I'm going to vote +1 because everything worked fine. I was just wondering what is wrong with this approve script. Alex are you saying that we shouldn't have in squiggly script checking for PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME? Some part of squiggly build need this path, for exam

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-10-25 Thread Alex Harui
Squiggly compiles against the Flex SDK, you’ll need to set up all of the environment required to use the Flex SDK repo or source packages. See the README in the flex-sdk repo or source packages. I suppose that the Squiggly README should be updated to show folks how to build against source packages

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-10-25 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I use ApproveSquiggly.xml and got this error. ApproveSquiggly is a script Alex added to make automates some of the releases checks it's not a requirement that you use it. Squiggy itself only requires FLEX_HOME to be set but it may be that ApproveSquiggly requires a few more environment v

Re: [DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-10-25 Thread piotrz
Hi Justin, I have just wanted to vote for release, but build of squiggly failed for me. I use ApproveSquiggly.xml and got this error: compileframework: Loading configuration file H:\flexsdk\ApacheFlex_4.13.0_Air_14\frameworks\flex-c onfig.xml Apache Flex compc (Component Compiler) Version

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-24 Thread Alex Harui
+1 binding Package https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/squiggly/1.1/rc1/apache-flex-sq uiggly-1.1-src.tar.gz Java 1.7 OS: Mac OS X x86_64 10.9.5 Source kit signatures match: y Source kit builds: y README is ok: y RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y NOTICE is ok: y LICENSE is ok: y No unapproved

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-24 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > What? I did not vote against squiggly on the contrary, I really need this > project working! ;) You did vote for it but only PMC members votes are binding on releases. Thanks for taking the time to vote and you'll notice your name was added to the contributors file. You are

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-24 Thread Erik de Bruin
Justin noted your vote as +1, don’t worry. The “Non binding” bit just means that you are not a PMC member. EdB On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Eliezer Reis wrote: > What? I did not vote against squiggly on the contrary, I really need this > project working! ;) > > +1 &g

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-24 Thread windowns
+1 binding Chris From: Justin Mclean Sent: ‎Thursday‎, ‎October‎ ‎23‎, ‎2014 ‎10‎:‎05‎ ‎PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Hi, This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release Candidate 1. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README. Changes from last version include minor README changes as a result exist

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-24 Thread Eliezer Reis
What? I did not vote against squiggly on the contrary, I really need this project working! ;) +1 +1 +1 +1 2014-10-24 3:05 GMT-02:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release Candidate 1. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES > and the README. > > Changes from last ver

[VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 1

2014-10-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release Candidate 1. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README. Changes from last version include minor README changes as a result exist votes carry over. They are: Binding: +1 Justin Mclean +1 Mark Kessler Non Binding: +1 Eliezer Reis Note that you can retest

[DISCUSS] Squiggly 1.1 RC1

2014-10-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Please place all discussion here and not in the vote thread. Justin

[VOTE] [CANCEL] Squiggly 1.1 RC 0

2014-10-23 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Review of RC0 found a few very minor README issues, and while there are not enough to stop a release as per [1], I'll be making a RC1 including these changes. As the changes are minimal votes will carry over. Thanks, Justin 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 0

2014-10-22 Thread Eliezer Reis
+1 2014-10-21 23:08 GMT-02:00 Mark Kessler : > +1 > > -Successfully built from source > -Check License > -Check notice > > > -Mark > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I went through the RC. Checked in a bunch of spelling errors in SWC > names, README, RELEASE_NOTES. IMO, it wouldn’t be right to release a > Spell Checker with spelling errors in the supporting documentation ;-). We released 1.0 with similar "issues". You could think of it as data to test

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Alex Harui
> I believe ApacheFlexSpellingFramework.swc and >>ApacheFlexSpellingEngine.swc >> exist so that Squiggy can be used with both AS and Flex project, but we >> would have to ask Adobe/original developers what their intent was. You >> require both for Squiggly to work with Flex proj

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 0

2014-10-21 Thread Mark Kessler
+1 -Successfully built from source -Check License -Check notice -Mark On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES > and the README. > > Changes from the last version: > -

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Martin
ny references to ApacheSpellingFramework.swc or > ApacheFlexLinguisticUtils.swc in the README file. > > I believe ApacheFlexSpellingFramework.swc and ApacheFlexSpellingEngine.swc > exist so that Squiggy can be used with both AS and Flex project, but we > would have to ask Adobe/original developers what

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
but we would have to ask Adobe/original developers what their intent was. You require both for Squiggly to work with Flex projects. ApacheFlexLinguisticUtils.swc I think is optional and may be required if you want to add your own custom dictionaries but again I'm not 100% sure what Adobe'

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Martin
Justin, Okay after reviewing your email. I was able to get this to work. I took the ApacheSpellingUI.swc out of the src folder, so I only have ApacheSpellingUIEx.swc in my libs folder. And I've added the ApackeFlexLinguisticUtils.swc into my libs folder. After that everything works great! Prop

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Martin
Justin, I also have the following in my lib folder: ApacheSpellingEngine.swc ApacheSpellingUIEx.swc Per the README I also have ApacheSpellingUI.swc in my src folder. Is that right? I noted above you mentioned that it was included in the libs folder. Also you said that you have either ApacheSp

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Yep, included that in my libs folder per the README. What other swcs do you have in your lib directory? I think you need a minimum of SpellingEngine.swc, SpellingFramework.swc, LinguisticUtils.swf (?) and SpellingUI.swf or SpellingUIEx.swf depending if you have mx or spark controls. I've

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Chris Martin
Justin, >As per the README I think you need to add ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc for it to work with spark >components. Yep, included that in my libs folder per the README. Chris On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > After including the ApacheFlexSpellingFramework.s

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
however. It not that I disagreed it's just that: - I can't see Squiggly having many RCs, it straight forward and there nothing contentious in there that I'm aware of - Asking people to QA stuff without a vote doesn't tend to get anywhere (see the previous non voting RC0s I did) Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Erik de Bruin
There has to be at least one vote in order for something to become a release. Having said that, the consensus within the PMC was to first do a few rounds of QA without calling a vote for each build. That way, if a few people ironed out the wrinkles first, likely only one round of voting would be n

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I thought we were going to skip votes for release candidates ? You need to vote on a RC in order to make it a official release, there's no way that Apache policy (for good reasons). Plus I can't see this release having a large number of RCs unless there's something obvious I'm missing as

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-21 Thread Tom Chiverton
I thought we were going to skip votes for release candidates ? Tom On 20/10/14 04:00, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Please place any discussion here and not in the vote thread. Thanks, Justin __ This email has been scanned by the

Re: [VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 0

2014-10-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding Here's what I checked: - artefact names good - hashes and signatures correct - all source files have Apache headers - no unexpected binary files in release - LICENSE and NOTICE are correct - can compile from source - checked that spell checking work (with the correct lib) for both

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > After including the ApacheFlexSpellingFramework.swc in my lib I got past > that error. Maybe we need to add that into the README? As per the README I think you need to add ApacheFlexSpellingUIEx.swc for it to work with spark components. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-20 Thread Chris Martin
e. Right now i'm running FP 15, with the build files for the squiggly swcs referencing the globalplayer.swc for FP14, and my flex-sdk home is still set to Flex 4.12.1 which matches the SDK i'm using in the project and that is expecting at least FP 12.0. I'll try to take another look

Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Here's a sample to test out spelling working in spark components: http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"; xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark" xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx"> You'll need to add the en_GB dictionary to your project and set up the spelling co

[VOTE] Squiggly 1.1 RC 0

2014-10-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, This is a Squiggly 1.1 Release Candidate 0. Please see the RELEASE_NOTES and the README. Changes from the last version: - Mavenized version of Squiggly - Added installer ant file - Added en_US and en_GB dictionaries - Now works with both halo and saprk components The release candidate can

[DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.1 release candidate 0

2014-10-19 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Please place any discussion here and not in the vote thread. Thanks, Justin

  1   2   3   >